Wikipedia:WikiProject Law/to do
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Factual verification needed
- Cinema of Japan#Copyright status of Japanese films - factual verification needed (necessary for wikipedia image screenshots from Japanese films), official Japanese references would be great
- Florida v. J.L. - the article is being heavily edited by a generally unconstructive (and possibly though unlikely WP:COI) editor. An editor who knows the facts of the case may want to make sure that nothing inappropriate is being done to the article. Chicken Wing (talk) 21:51, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Article clean up
- Insider trading -- especially international aspects
- Merger guidelines -- desperately needs cleanup and expansion, very inaccurate
- Attorney of record
- Civil confinement
- Compelling state interest -- Cleanup needed, compelling interest section of First amendment is inconsistent with Compelling state interest
- Jury nullification
- Biopiracy
- Murder - needs cites, could become a GA with a bit of work
- Copyright Term Extension Act - needs a lot more cites, cleanup
- J.D. - neutrality of editors in dispute (whether JD is graduate degree and whether doctorate degree). please comment.
- Obviously missing topics
- Legal certainty
- List of notable United Kingdom House of Lords cases - lots of redlinked cases
- Abby Rubenfeld - civil rights attorney, former chair of ABA IR&R section, and sister of Paul Rubens
- Computer assisted legal research or Computer based legal research
- In need of elaboration
- Dualism (law) - I'm suprised this didn't have an article until i wrote a stub just now
- Assisted person
- Partnership (UK)
- Demonstrative evidence
- Immigration law
- Codicil
- Reciprocal agreement
- Trade Agreements Act of 1979
- European Cooperative Society
- Article clean up and references needed
- Perjury - not worldwide, mostly lists, needs citations
- Co-signing - cleanup, cites, very incomplete as of now
- Doing business as - cleanup
- Testator
- Class action
- Equity (law)
- Indemnity
- Missing heirs
- Trusts
- United States v. Baker
- Contingency fee
- Clear and present danger
- Rational basis review - the article is confusing and inaccurate
- Assessment requested
- Current law articles on peer review
- Current featured content candidates
- Policy discussion: "Magistrates' Court" vs. "Magistrates Court" (on Wikiproject Australian Law's Policy talkpage but relevant to other jurisdictions too)