Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Mythology/Assessment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Japanese mythology articles |
Importance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top | High | Mid | Low | None | Total | ||
| Quality | |||||||
 FA |
1 | 1 | |||||
| A | 1 | 1 | |||||
 GA |
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| B | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 19 | ||
| Start | 3 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 132 | 147 | |
| Stub | 2 | 1 | 162 | 165 | |||
| List | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Assessed | 6 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 311 | 338 | |
| Unassessed | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Total | 6 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 314 | 341 | |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Japanese mythology WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Japanese mythology and/or related subjects. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{jmyth}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Japanese mythology articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
[edit] Frequently asked questions
- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Japanese mythology WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
[edit] Instructions
An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{jmyth}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WikiProject Japanese mythology
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review=
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter:
- FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Japanese mythology articles)
- A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Japanese mythology articles)
- GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Japanese mythology articles)
- B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Japanese mythology articles)
- Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Japanese mythology articles)
- Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Japanese mythology articles)
- NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article Japanese mythology pages)
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Japanese mythology articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.
[edit] Quality scale
| Label | Criterion | Reader's experience | Editor's experience | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA {{FA-Class}} |
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles. | Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information. | No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible. | Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007) |
| FL {{FL-Class}} |
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured lists" status, and meet the current criteria for featured lists. | Definitive. Outstanding, thorough list; a great source for encyclopedic information. | No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible. | FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives (as of January 2008) |
| A {{A-Class}} |
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy (peer-reviewed where appropriate). Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. | Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. | Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. | Durian (as of March 2007) |
| GA {{GA-Class}} |
The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise acceptable. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. | Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, or excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. | Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. | International Space Station (as of February 2007) |
| B {{B-Class}} |
Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. | Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. | Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. | Jammu and Kashmir (as of October 2007) has a lot of helpful material but needs more prose content and references. |
| Start {{Start-Class}} |
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
|
Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. | Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. | Real analysis (as of November 2006) |
| Stub {{Stub-Class}} |
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. | Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. | Coffee table book (as of July 2005) |
[edit] Importance scale
The following values may be used for the importance parameter (they should be entered exactly as given):
| Value | Meaning | Examples | Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top | "Key" articles, considered indispensable | Top-importance Japanese mythology articles | |
| High | High-priority topics and needed subtopics of "key" articles, often with a broad scope; needed to complement any general understanding of the field | High-importance Japanese mythology articles | |
| Mid | Mid-priority articles on more specialised (sub-)topics; possibly more detailed coverage of topics summarised in "key" articles, and as such their omission would not significantly impair general understanding | Mid-importance Japanese mythology articles | |
| Low | While still notable, these are highly-specialised or even obscure, not essential for understanding the wider picture ("nice to have" articles) | Low-importance Japanese mythology articles |
The importance parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. If the importance parameter is not yet set, or contains an invalid value, the article will be assigned to Category:Unknown-importance Japanese mythology articles.
[edit] Requesting an assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
[edit] Assessment log
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
 |
This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record. |
[edit] June 12, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] June 9, 2008
- Japanese dragon (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
- Mizuchi (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
- Wani (dragon) (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.
[edit] June 5, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] June 2, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] May 29, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] May 26, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] May 22, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] May 19, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] May 15, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] May 12, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] May 6, 2008
- Shishi (talk) Start-Class (No-Class) renamed to Shishi (stone lion)
[edit] April 23, 2008
- Abumi-guchi (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.
- Akaname (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.
- Datsue-ba (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.
- Enenra (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.
- Keneō (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.
[edit] April 16, 2008
- Hyakkai-Zukan (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.
- Nure-onna (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.
- Uwan (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) added.
[edit] April 13, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] April 6, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] April 2, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] March 30, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] March 26, 2008
- Ama-no-Uzume (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) renamed to Ame-no-Uzume
[edit] March 21, 2008
- Yata no kagami (talk) Stub-Class (No-Class) renamed to Yata no Kagami
[edit] March 18, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] March 15, 2008
[edit] March 10, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] March 8, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] March 3, 2008
- Japanese dragon (talk) Start-Class (No-Class) removed.
[edit] February 26, 2008
- Shirahime-Syo: Snow Goddess Tales (talk) Start-Class (No-Class) removed.
[edit] February 22, 2008
- GeGeGe no Kitaro (talk) Start-Class (No-Class) removed.
[edit] February 18, 2008
- Kuchisake-onna (talk) Start-Class (No-Class) renamed to Kuchisake-Onna
[edit] February 14, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] February 10, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] February 5, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] February 2, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] January 26, 2008
- (No changes today)
[edit] Worklist
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
| See also: assessed article categories. | Last update: June 12, 2008 |
