Wikipedia:WikiProject Hertfordshire/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hertfordshire
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1 2
Good article GA 2 1 2 5
B 2 7 4 3 16
Start 4 16 37 25 14 96
Stub 7 26 30 21 84
List 1 1
Assessed 6 33 68 59 38 204
Unassessed 8 4 3 117 132
Total 6 41 72 62 155 336

Contents

[edit] Quality scale

Article progress grading scheme [  v • d • e  ]
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Featured article FA
{{FA-Class}}		 Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further editing is necessary unless new published information has come to light; but further improvements to the text are often possible. Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
A
{{A-Class}}		 Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy (peer-reviewed where appropriate). Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Durian (as of March 2007)
Good article GA
{{GA-Class}}		 The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise acceptable. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B
{{B-Class}}		 Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. Munich air disaster (as of May 2006) has a lot of helpful material but contains too many lists, and needs more prose content and references.
Start
{{Start-Class}}		 The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub
{{Stub-Class}}		 The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. Coffee table book (as of July 2005)

Usage instructions

  • Code below is for customizing the template for a specific WikiProject. Fields are optional, and will default to generic examples if left blank.
  • Specifying the Project field will link the class labels to the appropriate quality category in the given project in the format "FA-Class Project articles".
  • Specifying article class examples will display the provided text in the example for the given quality.
  • The rows for List, Template, Dab, Cat, and NA will not be displayed unless a value is specified for the desired parameter.

Copy & paste

{{Grading scheme
|Project          =
|FA_example       =
|A_example        =
|GA_example       =
|B_example        =
|Start_example    =
|Stub_example     =
|List_example     =
|Template_example =
|Dab_example      =
|Cat_example      =
|NA_example       =
|}}

[edit] Importance scale

For now, this will use the Wikipedia version 0.5 importance scale, as modified by the discussion at [1].

Top Subject is fundamental to Herts or of significant international interest
High Subject is of significant national interest and/ or impact
Mid Subject is of interest/ impact beyond its local area
Low The subject is of interest within its local area or subject
None Unassessed, importance still to be determined

[edit] Log

Archive This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record.


[edit] June 12, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] June 9, 2008

[edit] June 5, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] June 2, 2008

[edit] May 29, 2008

[edit] May 26, 2008

[edit] May 22, 2008

[edit] May 19, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] May 15, 2008

[edit] May 12, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] May 6, 2008

[edit] April 23, 2008

[edit] April 16, 2008

[edit] April 13, 2008

[edit] April 6, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] April 2, 2008

[edit] March 28, 2008

[edit] March 23, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 21, 2008

  • Markyate reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Stub-Class (No-Class)

[edit] March 18, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 14, 2008

  • Robert Runcie reassessed from Unassessed-Class (High-Class) to B-Class (High-Class)
  • British Schools Museum (Hitchin) reassessed from Start-Class (Low-Class) to B-Class (Low-Class)
  • Aldbury reassessed from Unassessed-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)

[edit] March 10, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 7, 2008

[edit] March 2, 2008

[edit] February 26, 2008

[edit] February 22, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 18, 2008

[edit] February 14, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 9, 2008

[edit] February 5, 2008

[edit] February 2, 2008

  • Verulamium reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (High-Class)
  • Knebworth reassessed from Stub-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Sandridge reassessed from Stub-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Shenley, Hertfordshire reassessed from Stub-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Therfield reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Mortimer Wheeler (talk) Start-Class (No-Class) added.
  • Piccotts End reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (No-Class)
  • Markyate reassessed from Start-Class (Low-Class) to Stub-Class (Low-Class)
  • Widford, Hertfordshire (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] January 26, 2008

(No changes today)