Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Peer review/Batman Begins
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Batman Begins
I've previously posted this article for a general peer review, but I thought I'd try to see if I can get stronger feedback here at WikiProject Films. I'd like for this article to reach FA status, but I'm fine with achieving GA status along the way. The article is currently being renovated as of a couple of weeks ago, so feel free to compare and see the progress. The to-do list on the film article's talk page highlights what I hope will be accomplished next. For example, I plan to revise the lead paragraphs per WP:LEAD after the body of the article has been written. Please take a look at how the article looks so far -- feedback would be great appreciated! --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 18:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Wow! You have a lot of informationt there! Another thing you could include is a "Critics" sub-section of "Reception" for how it was received by critics. Cbrown1023 22:07, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- I plan to do that, but how do we aggregate the reviews by critics to present an "overall" review of the film? That's what seems challenging, because there had been a Criticism section before that was full of weasel words. I want to avoid that this time around. --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 22:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Just do the best you can. I normally just put some reviews of well-known reviewers (also include their importance like not just by John Doe; but John Doe from the New York Times or just New York Times). I also recommend looking at Category:FA-Class film articles. You may want to look there for ideas on critical reception (such as Casablanca (film)#Critical response, but I suggest more than Casablanca). Cbrown1023 01:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- The film article has achieved GA status. Can anyone watching the peer review page please review the article to see how it can be improved further? --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 01:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- I saw it reached GA, that was a while ago, wasn't it? I'm sure it can be improved further (it would be naiive to assume it couldn't) but I can't think of anything, the article is great! Cbrown1023 02:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
