Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Points of interest related to Websites on Wikipedia
Category - WikiProject - Deletions

Deletion Sorting Project
Project page (talk) Lists (by ABC) Lists (by topic)
AfD: Today, Yesterday edit · changes

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Websites. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting.

You can help maintain the list on this page:

• To add a new AfD discussion (once it has already been opened on WP:AFD):

• Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
• You can also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Websites}}<small>—~~~~</small> to it, which will inform users that it has been listed here.
• There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

• Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
• You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Websites.

Please note that adding an AfD to, or removing it from, this page does not add it to, or remove it from, the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page, before adding it to this page.

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list also includes a sublist or sublists of deletions related to webcomics and fora.Suggested inclusion guidelines for this topic area can be found at WP:WEB.

Purge page cache

Watch this page

Contents 1 Websites 1.1 Host.net 1.2 Youjav.com 1.3 BCA Illustrated 1.4 Literary Rejections on Display 1.5 PxSpot 2 Website Proposed deletions

[edit] Websites

[edit] Host.net

Host.net (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Lack or external references or sources makes me wonder if this is really a notable company? Addionne (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

• Keep it was created with its current content and a tag, and AFD'ed one minute later? I'd like to hear from the creator before deleting it. Google seems to provide a reasonably good set of possible RS'es, like this one. Jclemens (talk) 01:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per Jclemens. The article is new and could use some expansion with more/better references. No reason to delete it ... at least not yet. Truthanado (talk) 01:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers, Wikipedia:Don't demolish the house while it's still being built and Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol#Patrolling new pages. Start at the bottom of the patrol list, which is currently backlogged to 14 May 2008, and work up. Debate 木 01:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep I agree with the above. The article's still in construction; no reason to delete yet. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep 1 minute and 13 seconds to deletion? Keep based on apparent conflict of interest of nominator. Good grief. --Blechnic (talk) 06:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete although I appreciate everyones attempt to save a new article this AFD will last 5 days and I see no way this article will reach WP:CORP requirements. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 15:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:43, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Youjav.com

Youjav.com (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Non-notable web pron upload site. No references at all, not able to verify. Original author blocked for persistent spamming and inappropriate new articles. Contested speedy. I removed the subsequent prod to get this over with. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. No evidence of secondary sources that would indicate notability. Kevin (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N and WP:SPAM. The article's title leads you directly to its site. Artene50 (talk) 04:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:N. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:03, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Notability is lacking for this spam article. --Ecoleetage (talk) 07:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as web content w/ no assertion of notability tgies (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Article made by a troll whose account only serves to create vandalism. мirаgeinred سَراب ٭ (talk) 14:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] BCA Illustrated

BCA Illustrated (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Non notable website SGGH ^speak! 13:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

• Tagged for speedy deletion as blatant advertising. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 13:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, unless sourcing added to show why this is more notable than other building code websites.--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 13:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, non notable commercial subscription website with no showing of either notability or broad appeal to the general public. The building code itself is probably worthy of an article; not this online edition. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete utterly non-notable. Could easily have been speedied as A7 web content. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Literary Rejections on Display

Literary Rejections on Display (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

This blog does not seem especially notable. The only sources that I can find are other blogs. Captain panda 20:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
• Comment A Google search reveals several thousand hits here though most of the sources are other blogs as farbric notes. Its a borderline subject. No Opinion at present but it seems to be a genuine site. Artene50 (talk) 04:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
• Comment Site should be retained. It clearly is a subject of interest among major literary figures who contribute to its debates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.206.81.200 (talk) 15:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Website Proposed deletions

no articles proposed for deletion at this time

---