Wikipedia:WikiProject Compositions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This Wikipedia page has been superseded by WikiProject Classical music, and it is retained primarily for historical interest. |
|
|
|
|
| Neoclassical (see Neoclassicism) |
| Modernistic (see Modernism) |
|
|
| Dadaistic (see Dada) |
| Impressionistic (see Impressionist music) |
| Jazz (see Jazz) |
| Minimalistic (see Minimalist music) |
| Nationalistic (see Nationalism) |
| Populistic (see Populism) |
| Postminimalistic (see Postminimalism) |
| Surrealist (see Surrealist music) |
|
|
| Atonal (see Atonality) |
| Twelve-tone (see Twelve-tone technique) |
| List of pieces which use serialism (see Serialism) |
| Extended techniques (see Extended technique) |
| Pandiatonic (see Pandiatonic) |
| Polytonal (see Polytonality) |
| Process music (see Process music) |
| Quartal (see Quartal harmony) |
| Quarter tone (see Quarter tone) |
| Whole tone (see Whole tone scale) |
| Phase (see Phasing) |
| Quotation (see Quotation) |
Template:Pieces-identity
See: Template:Pieces-identity
Template:Pieces-instrumentation
See: Template:Pieces-instrumentation
Template:Pieces-composer
See: Template:Pieces-composer
I propose the following guidelines for lists of pieces:
- The naming of lists of pieces should follow Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists) the wikipedia: naming conventions, specifically Wikipedia:Naming conventions (pieces of music)
- It appears at this point that we do not need to include "musical pieces" in the title of the list (Wikipedia:Naming conventions (precision)), as piece redirects to musical composition.
- List should additionally:
- Use "-istic" whenever possible, preferred over "-ist" (example: modernistic, not modernist or modern)
- Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Lists of pieces - Lists of pieces has a format borrowed from Lists of solo piano pieces, which lists pages by composer, style or period, and nationality or culture. Now a list of pages itself and every alphabetical page clearly violates the "Do not use an article name that suggests a hierarchy of articles" convention, example: List of solo piano pieces by composer: G. Do we add lists such as this as an exception to that convention or make the "lists" one list instead of many? Hyacinth 08:54, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
