Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Article Classification/Archived requests 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Assessment Archive 1 (December 2006 - )

[edit] December 2006

  1. Why is Doctor Fate considered of low importance? Fate is at least a mid-level importance character. --Scottandrewhutchins 19:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
    We've got to contextualise these character's importance to the medium, not within their own specific sphere. So in the DC COmics Fate is probably going to be of mid level importance, but that translates to low in relation to the whole of comics. We've got to bear in mind that a lot of characters are going to be of no importance, the bit parters and so on. Low is quite high in that sense. I mean, an article on the character is not going to be a must, but it's certainly not filler. I can see how a low was given, but I can also see where you are coming from suggesting a mid. Hiding Talk 20:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
    I hardly see how Carnage is of more importance than Doctor Fate. --Scottandrewhutchins 11:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
    I've already indicated I feel Carnage should be low. Hiding Talk 09:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. Could someone look at Clea; it has no rating, on importance or quality. She's a very long-term supporting character, and I'd say the article is slightly better than a stub--Erikacornia 07:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. Could someone take a look over Robin (Tim Drake) please. I've rated it B/Mid, but I'm not sure if it should be higher up the "Class" scale. I may be a bit biased in that I've just spent a fair chunk of time tweaking it. — J Greb 22:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
    Looks right to me. For me it would need more references, needs to be written with the present tense where it describes plot detail and needs better grounding our universe, as well as a better lead paragraph to be an A class. I might move it down to a start class article, but I'm not over-bothered. Hiding Talk 14:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  4. Carnage (comics) - currently rated as B/High --Mrph 23:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Iron Man's armor - currently rated as ???/High --Mrph 23:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. List of S.H.I.E.L.D. members - currently rated as B/High --Mrph 23:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
    Chris has set them to Mid, Low and Low respectively, which I tend to agree with. I'd probably have gone Low on Carnage and offered a none on the other two, but Chris' way works too. Hiding Talk 21:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
    Sorry, yes, I meant to make mention of this. Why Low on Carnage? --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 13:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
    "Why Low on Carnage?" Well, why not. Is Carnage that important a character to the world of comics as a whole? Convince me. Certainly a mid to high level in relation to Spiderman, but to the entirety of comics? Green Goblin I would rate as mid, is Carnage as important as Green Goblin? Hiding Talk 14:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
    No opinion if Carnage should be mid or low, but high is certainly overrated (see my reasoning for the different categories on the talk page). I notice that already, some overenthusiasm in putting articles in Top and High is happening, but I'll wait to comment on most until I have a better view of what numbers these categories will have. Fram 14:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
    I think the wheat will eventually sort from the chaff as work gets underway. Hiding Talk 14:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
    You would rate Green Goblin as low? I might rate him medium and then Carnage Low. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 14:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
    No, I said I would rate him as mid, and then Carnage as low. Which it appears we agree on. Which is a good thing. :) Hiding Talk 14:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
    Actually, I think you convinced me about halfway through my writing the previous comment. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 15:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  7. The Noob - Currently rated as B/Low - I've done a lot of work on it from it's original stub, It would be nice to see how it measures up through peer review --Timmccloud 16:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. Batman (comic book) Start-Class and High, User:Fram 20:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2007

  1. Crisis on Infinite Earths is currently rated as an 'A' class (and 'Top' importance) article - I'm not sure this class is correct, but I'm not confident enough to amend it myself. Can someone take a look? --Mrph 18:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
    No longer an issue Now revised to B/High. --Mrph 08:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. Uncle Sam (comics) Re-rated as low, User:J Greb 18:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  3. WildC.A.T.s/X-Men rated as Start class & Low importance, User:Mrph 08:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

  1. Could we get some consistency in the importance ratings for the various "Age" articles? Currently Silver Age of Comic Books and Bronze Age of Comic Books are rated as Top importance, Golden Age of Comic Books is rated as High, and Modern Age of Comic Books is rated as Mid. I would suggest they all be set as High. Thanks. -- Iron Ghost 19:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
    All re-rated back to mid. Hiding Talk 14:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. Thanos Re-rated B-Class, User:Circeus 01:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  3. Democracy (Judge Dredd storyline) rate as B-class and low importance, Hiding Talk 14:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  4. Off*beat B class Hiding Talk 21:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
  5. Anarky on hold at the minute, needs a few more tweaks fo GA/A-class. Steve block Talk 21:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Rated as GA/A-class and low. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cast (talk • contribs) 21:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  6. Anarky rate as B and low, Hiding Talk 14:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  7. W.I.T.C.H. rate as start and low, Hiding Talk 14:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  8. S.H.I.E.L.D. re-rate as low, Hiding Talk 14:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  9. Savage Dragon rate as B and Low, Hiding Talk 14:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  10. Anarky on hold at the minute, needs a few more tweaks fo GA/A-class. Hiding Talk 21:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

  1. Requesting an assessment for Anarky (comic book). - Cast 00:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Had been assessed as of January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

  1. Funky Winkerbean - Rebochan 17:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Starbolt - --Nighthawkzx 16:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC) Rated as Start, Low Maple Leaf 16:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  3. Xkcd. --Cadet hastings 00:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Rated as Start, High Maple Leaf 16:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  4. Cybersix rate as B and low --Benten 20:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Maple Leaf 16:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  5. Flame (comics) Konczewski 15:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Rated already as Start, Low
Or atleast was as of January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

  1. CrossGen --72.49.117.89 16:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Rated as B Maple Leaf 16:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  2. Bionicle - I cannot fathom why this is "top" importance. Phil Sandifer 02:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Top importance was for Wikiproject Logo, comics rating was Low. Maple Leaf 16:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

  1. Hellboy B and Low I'd say The Taste of Monkeys 23:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. Lex Luthor - B-Class, Top importance. It just got raised to GA.Johnnyfog 17:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  3. The Tick Recieved a start rating/mid importance. businessman332211 20:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

  1. Lady Snowblood - Please rerate - Done Maple Leaf 20:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  2. Civil War: The Initiative - Rate as Mid importance. --Martin de la Iglesia 15:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  3. New Adventures Of Queen Victoria 68.34.242.83 02:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
MwNNrules considers it doesn't need assessment. See [1]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. The_noob (webcomic)- Please rate, I've added the templates to the discussion page. Timmccloud 22:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
BOZ notes this page was deleted as of December 3--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. The_noob (webcomic)- Please rate, I've added the templates to the discussion page. Timmccloud 22:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Had been assessed as of January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. Wundarr the Aquarian - I've made a good deal of changes to the article(including references). ~ (Wakandas black panther 07:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)) - Rerated Maple Leaf 20:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
businessman332211 had already assessed it as of January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. Technet - I think this article is now set out very nicely, considering the complication of the material. Probably not very important though! -Kez 21:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC) - Done Maple Leaf 20:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

  1. Sin City - Rated as B and Low (left comments) - businessman332211 18:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Apparently was posted in February 2007, though. See Revision as of 11:40, 29 January 2008--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. DC: The New Frontier - handy to know where the land lies before we target it for improvement. (Emperor 16:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC))
See [2]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. Dork Tower - Just wanted to get an assessment on this article and it's importance as it's currently unrated on both. --Craw-daddy | T | 18:51, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Request had been met as of January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. Jolen (comics) Start Rating and low importance, done. businessman332211 18:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

  1. Steve Roper and Mike Nomad I've greatly expanded content and sources, adding linked new articles on the authors. A new assessment will be appreciated: is it still "Start" class?SteveRoper 04:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
MWNNrules saw it on January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. America (Judge Dredd story) - currently rated as a stub, it has just been expanded. Richard75 23:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
See [3]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. Steve Roper and Mike Nomad I've greatly expanded content and sources, adding linked new articles on the authors. A new assessment will be appreciated: is it still "Start" class?SteveRoper 04:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
MwNNrules saw it on January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. Batman: Anarky - currently rated as stub. I've just expanded it.--Cast 02:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
See [4]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

  1. George Liquor - No rating or grade. Currently under GA evaluation - Gak Blimby (talk) 17:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
See [5]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. Stan Lee Media has just been expanded to fall within the scope of the project. I added the template and gave it a quality assessment myself (not without reasoning) but have no idea what to give it for its importance rating.--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 06:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
MwNNrules appears to consider it of Low importance for WikiPorject Comics. See [6]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  1. Strangehaven has been expanded a great deal with information on publication history, characters and issues. --Mister Six (talk) 12:08, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
See [7]