Wikipedia:WikiProject Cetaceans
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This WikiProject is about cetaceans - that's whales, dolphins and porpoises to you and me. The aim of the project is to write a good description of every known cetacean species out there (all 78, or 79, or 80,... however many there are :-)).
[edit] Announcements
- (27/11/2006) The Cetaceans Portal is now featured!
- (07/11/2006) Portal:Cetaceans is a featured portal candidate.
- (28/09/2006) Taxonomy templates created to ease taxonomic listing on pages.
- (10/06/2006) Redesigned layout of Cetaceans Portal
- (26/06/2005) Added a list of species (List of dolphins and whales)
- (26/02/2004) All species now have IUCN status and a range map in the taxobox
- (12/02/2004) All species now have an article or part of an article
- (05/02/2004) There is a vigourous debate going on at Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life about whether and how taxoboxes should be extended to include there. General comments there and specific comments about how cetacean articles would be best served here are welcome.
- (30/12/2003) We now have an article on each of the species in the Cephalorhynchus genus.
- (28/11/2003) We now have an article on each of the species in the Ziphidae family.
- (26/11/2003) We now have an article on each of the porpoise species. Shame the Delphinidae are five times as numerous!
- (24/11/2003) We now have an article on everything in the Mysticeti suborder. Shame the toothies are five times as numerous!
- (20/11/2003) Rice's classification moved in full to Cetacea article. This is liable to more updates... every book/webpage claiming to reproduce his listing says something different
[edit] Queue
Put news stories here that perhaps should be integrated/referenced in appropriate articles (if you are really into this stuff, maybe get Google News Alerts for "whale", "dolphin", and "porpoise").
- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4034383.stm
- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5066538.stm
- http://news.scotsman.com/edinburgh.cfm?id=1044482006
[edit] Things to be done
[edit] Featured Article/Good Article Candidates
These articles are regarded as being comprehensive and may have been labelled as a good article or is a featured article; or may be good enough to almost be listed as either.
= Good Article candidate, = Featured Article candidate
- Baiji - Since its demise this article has improved a lot, with a bit more work could be GA.
[edit] Requests
Leave any requests you have or have found elsewhere here.
- List of extinct species --> already created: List of extinct cetaceans
- Gray's Paradox
[edit] Stubs
These articles are very short and may only include a sentence or two.
- Cephalorhynchus
- Callosity
- Cetology - a few paragraphs long, but about 2,300 years out of date.
[edit] Expand
These articles are not listed as stubs but are only just about long enough to escape being so. Any help expanding these would be appreciated.
- Hector's Beaked Whale
- Ginkgo-toothed Beaked Whale
- Shepherd's Beaked Whale
- Archaeoceti
- Cumberland Sound Beluga
- Blubber
- Humpback Dolphins
[edit] Copyedit/Formatting
These articles may have enough text but are poorly formatted and may have spelling mistakes.
[edit] Patrol for vandalism
Have a look at the recent changes for the Category:Cetaceans
[edit] Collaboration of the Month
The current Cetaceans Collaboration of the month is North Pacific Right Whale. To nominate or vote for an article visit the collaboration page. |
The Cetaceans Collaboration of the Month is a collaborative effort to improve whale, porpoise and dolphin-related articles, in order to help them reach featured-article standards. Anyone, no matter what their level of knowledge about Cetacea, is welcome to lend a hand. Each month, an article is chosen by people interested in the topic, and for the next month the chosen article is worked on, under Wikipedia's principle of collaborative editing. This provides a single article for people to concentrate their efforts on collaboratively.
[edit] Article assessment
Article assessment is the process by which cetacean articles are sorted into different qualities. Assessment is done through the assessment page.
[edit] Article structure
Bowhead Whale | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservation status | ||||||||||||||||||
Scientific classification | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Binomial name | ||||||||||||||||||
Balaena mysticetus Linnaeus, 1758 |
||||||||||||||||||
Bowhead Whale range
|
Articles on almost every species have now been started. Most species have their own article with the exception of Mesoplodont Whales - too little information known for separate articles - and Humpback Dolphins - the lack of consensus from the taxonomists makes difficult to know what species to choose. Better to do at the genus level to avoid making a judgement.
See Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life/taxobox usage for the details of how to construct a taxobox.
[edit] Images
An image in JPG or PNG format is very welcome, although the latter format is not as good for photographs. For public domain resources try the American National Oceanic and Atomospheric Administration, particularly the National Marine Fisheries Historic Image Collection.
[edit] Range maps
The basic template map is the world map without country borders that can be found at Wikipedia:Blank maps.
The blue colour shows where the species is (sometimes) present and white is where it is absent.
The grey colour has R:205 G:195 B:204 The blue colour has R:0 G:0 B:255 (:-))
If you edit a map, try to save at full-quality so that no blurring occurs at the edge of the countries - this blurring makes further editing of the map more difficult because the "fill" function of many image editing programs doesn't work with the blurred edges.
[edit] What to include
Some topics that might (and probably should) be written about are physical characteristics (birth size and weight, adult size and weight (male and female), life expectancy, gestation period, lactation period, baleen or toothed, colour, callosities, fins size shape and existence, speed, what do they eat, interaction with other species etc.) Population and distribution including changes over time. Distinguishing between one species and another. The relationship between this species and the whaling and whale-watching industries. The discoverer/describer of the species. Scientific names. Taxonomy debates. English meaning of Scientific name. This list is not exhaustive!
The study of whales is cetology. Some information is probably best described in an article outside a particular species e.g. baleen.
[edit] Articles at higher than species level
... check out Category:Cetaceans
[edit] Species
- See the list at Cetacea.
[edit] References
There are huge numbers of books on the subject. The websites listed at cetacea may be useful for quick fact-verifying
- http://www.acsonline.org/ American Cetacean Society
- British Cetacean Site especially interesting is taxonomy
- Cetacea.org homepage
- Walker's Mammals of the World Online - Cetaceans (Unfortunately, the online edition of Walker's Mammals of the World is no longer available. The print edition may still be purchased through the Johns Hopkins University Press.)
- Cetacean Society International
[edit] Free pictures
The NOAA has some great cetacean photos on the web. It is a U.S. Federal Government department, so its photos are public domain. They're on many websites and can be tricky to find through searches. Here are some examples:
- http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/read/protspp/RightWhale/page3.html
- http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/mammals/cetaceans/
[edit] Participants
- User:Rav314
- User:Pcb21 (Pete)
- Tannin
- Dante Alighieri | Talk (just the river dolphins, really)
- [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (talk)]]
- KJen74 - I discovered this project only this weekend, and I hope to increase my level of contribution as time permits.
- 68.169.113.246 Made the List of dolphins and whales page
- Death Eater Dan #(Muahaha) Created the new article box on the portal main page
- Chris_huh
- UberScienceNerd
- Belugaperson Edited Beluga page, which is rather fitting
- User:Jimfbleak
- User:NuclearWinner
- Neil916 (Talk) Also a member of WikiProject Fishes
- User:Clayoquot
- User:SammytheSeal here and there
- User:akhampton dabbling a little
- PatricknoddyTALK (reply here)|HISTORY
- Pengo
- User:Shirehorse Adding photographs (example Harbour Porpoise vs Bottlenose Dolphin)
- István
- User:FionaBlinco
- User:Jonas Poole
- User:Emperor13
- User:Guidewell
- User:Rlendog
- User:SWF Trainer
- User:Rav314
[edit] Other WikiProjects
Parents : Wikipedia:WikiProject Mammals, Wikipedia:WikiProject Marine life
Grandparents : Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life, Wikipedia:WikiProject Biology
Greatgrandparent : Wikipedia:WikiProject Science
Siblings : Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds (big sister!), Wikipedia:WikiProject Dog breeds (yapping little brother), Wikipedia:WikiProject Primates (big brother), Wikipedia:WikiProject Sharks (step-brother) Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes (kissing cousin)
[edit] Things to be standardized
Capitalization: There was once a long debate about the capitalization of bird species on Wikipedia. The debate was backed by lots of research on both sides, but also became quite acrimonious. Call me a great wet lettuce (or Lettuce) but I for one hope to avoid repeating that debate, and get on with article-writing. Thus I propose we just borrow the convention from the bird project and then not worry about it too much. That is, capitalize species names when you write them in articles, e.g.
- The blow of a Blue Whale is 9m high.
and when you create an article for the species, create it with caps in the title and then immediately create a redirect from the lower-case version of the same name. (N.B.: I didn't take part in the original debate and don't particularly care what the standard is, but standards are often useful and many people want standards, so I am proposing this one).
- You are right IMO, and anyone who objects to importing the standard should know enough about the birds discussion to explain why cetaceans should be different, or else undertake to show why it should be changed at least for both, and preferably for vertebrates (or for some higher taxon that includes both).
- And therefore someone who will be more active in this project than Jerzy should propose, at Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life or its talk page, that there be a general standard (currently, capitalize all English species names, but of course subject to reconsideration) either
- 1. for all species, or
- 2. for all children of an independent (not redirected) Wikipedia:WikiProject Animals, where (in either additional project) the standard can be considered and promulgated without stepping on the toes of botanists (and perhaps microbiologists), whose realm(s) are the most likely ones to have conflicting naming or spelling standards in place.
One wrinkle: it is common practice in the cetacean literature to shorten e.g 'Southern Right Whales have no dorsal fin' to 'Southern Rights have no dorsal fin' i.e. drop 'Whale' as obvious. Two heavyweight books in the area are the Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals (which does this) and the National Audubon Society Guide to Marine Mammals of the World (which doesn't). I propose we allow (but not require) the shortening... it is better to avoid being unnecessarily prescriptive, and having two choices should make for less repetitious prose.
Spellings in taxonomy ( 'i' or 'ii', '-i' or 'es'): This seems to be inconsistent within the literature. Maybe we should have all article names in English, and make all common spellings of the Scientific version redirect to the English. I am thinking about sub-orders and families here; e.g. Mysticeti redirects to baleen whale.
- I don't want to open a can of worms here, but I think the bird species discussion isn't necessarily being applied consistently here. I've taken an interest in bottlenose dolphin and I think the capitalization should be Bottlenose dolphin, without a capital D on the dolphin. For reference, see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Birds#Bird names and article titles, which states:
The name of a group of species is not capitalised; birds, thrush family, kingfishers, turtle doves, marsh harriers.
- From this, I infer that the correct reference would be "Bottlenose dolphin" or just "Bottlenose." In support of this, I'd add that a dog's species is capitalized, but not the word "dog," as in "Rottweiler" but not a "Rottweiler Dog" or "Great Dane" instead of "Great Dane Dog."
-
- I don't think so. If we are capitalizing it should be Bottlenose Dolphin. Even if we follow the bird convention the bird discussion is pretty clear that it is "Bald Eagle", not "Bald eagle" or "King Penguin" not "King penguin". Penguin and eagle would correspond to dolphin here.Rlendog (talk) 00:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Ummm.... what's wrong with referring to the literature? I just did a search on Google Scholar for (as an example) "blue whale" [1]. EVERY SINGLE ONE of the first ten articles (didn't bother looking beyond the first page) use lower case letters. In accordance with both wikipedia tradition and the scientific literature, the article should be "blue whale," NOT "Blue Whale". Venture to guess the same is true of other whale species. Don't care enough to fight about it though. Rracecarr (talk) 19:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
-
[edit] Templates
[edit] Articles
[edit] Talk page box
Add this template to the top of talk pages of any relevant articles. This will add a box at the top of the page:
Use: {{CetaTalk}}
[edit] Collaboration of the Month box
This template just displays the current collaboration of the month.
The current Cetaceans Collaboration of the month is North Pacific Right Whale. To nominate or vote for an article visit the collaboration page. |
Use: {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Cetaceans/Collaboration/CetaceansCOTM}}
[edit] Portal box
This can be placed on any cetacean based article to link to the cetaceans portal.
Use: {{cetaceaportal}}
[edit] Userbox
If you want to add a userbox to your home page, letting everyone know about your interests in this project we have one.
Use: {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Cetaceans/Userbox}}
[edit] Welcome message
If you see that someone has added themself to the contributors list or the userbox to their page, you can add this to their talk page.
Welcome to WikiProject Cetaceans! Thank you for joining the project. There are many tasks that you can do to contribute:
|
Here are some tasks you can do, as organized by the Cetaceans WikiProject. If you are interested sign up on the project page:
|
If you want to show your membership, you can add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Cetaceans/Userbox}} to your userpage, which creates:
We hope you enjoy being a member of the WikiProject. If you have any questions, feel free to ask one of our project contributors, or inquire on the project's talk page. Again, welcome!
Use: {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Cetaceans/Welcome}}
[edit] Collaboration thanks
Add this to COTM voters' talk pages to thank them.
Thank you for your support of the WikiProject Cetaceans Collaboration. This month North Pacific Right Whale was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help. |
Use: {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Cetaceans/Collaboration/Thanks}}