The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article looks to me to be very close to meeting the Good Article criteria, if it hasn't already. If we can get the remaining kinks worked out, we should be able to have the article submitted as a candidate fairly quickly. Also, note that there is also a peer review for the article active already at WP:PEER.
Here's to another Good Article. Cheers! thadius856talk 22:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
It's been over a month and nobody has yet to say anything about the article? I'm shocked! Any ideas on why this is so that we can improve upon the system? thadius856talk|airports|neutrality 18:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I didn't even realize this page was here. Maybe if pages to be reviewed were listed on a more frequently viewed page?Gittinsj 07:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)gittinsj
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.