Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Peer review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This Wikipedia page is currently inactive and is retained as a historical archive. A historical page is either no longer relevant or consensus has become unclear. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you should seek broader input via a forum such as the proposals page of the village pump.

Australia WikiProject
Main project page + talk Noticeboard Collaboration of the Fortnight Requested articles and todo talk  → Articles needing attention talk  → Nominations for deletion talk  → New articles talk Article assessment (Log) talk  → Featured articles (109) talk  → Good articles (151) talk Outreach department talk Automation department talk Requested images Statistics talk Portal talk
Project organisation Participants + talk Userboxes talk Project banner talk Project category talk
Subprojects General topics Biota talk Crime talk Education talk Films talk History talk  → Exploration talk  → Maritime history talk Indigenous peoples talk Literature talk Military talk Music talk  → Crowded House talk  → Kylie Minogue talk  → Powderfinger talk Places talk Politics talk Sports talk Television talk States, places and regions New South Wales talk  → Sydney talk  → Riverina talk Northern Territory talk Queensland talk  → Brisbane talk  → Townsville talk South Australia talk  → Adelaide talk Tasmania talk Victoria talk  → Melbourne talk  → Geelong talk Western Australia talk Canberra talk Australian sports Australian Football League talk Baseball talk Basketball (possibly inactive) talk Football (soccer) talk Gridiron (possibly inactive) talk Rugby league talk Motorsport talk
edit · changes

Shortcut: WP:AUSPR

The peer review department of the Australia WikiProject conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.

The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality; however, requesting reviews on very short articles may not be productive, as there is little for readers to comment on.

All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the Australia WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete.

Contents 1 Instructions 1.1 Requesting a review 1.2 Responding to a request 1.3 Archiving 2 Requests 3 See also

[edit] Instructions

[edit] Requesting a review

1. Add peer-review=yes to the {{WP Australia}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax).
2. From there, click on the "request has been made" link that appears in the template. This will open a page to discuss the review of your article.
3. Place === [[Name of nominated article]] === at the top.
4. Below it, write your reason for nominating the article and sign by using four tildes (~~~~).
5. Add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Peer review/Name of nominated article}} at the top of the list of requests on this page.

[edit] Responding to a request

Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible.

[edit] Archiving

Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a featured article candidate. To archive a review:

1. Replace peer-review=yes with old-peer-review=yes in the {{WP Australia}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page
2. Move {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Peer review/Name of nominated article}} from this page to the current archive page.

[edit] Requests

[edit] See also

• Wikipedia:Peer review