Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main |
|
Participants |
|
Templates |
|
Page Content |
|
Categories |
|
Units |
|
Help/FAQ |
|
Notability |
|
Naming |
This is a set of suggested guidelines for articles on specific aircraft types. Some wikipedians prefer a standardised look and feel to articles on closely-related subjects and these guidelines exist to facilitate achieving that goal for articles about aircraft. For general guidelines about writing and editing Wikipedia articles, see Category:Wikipedia style guidelines.
[edit] NameEvery article in Wikipedia has a name, and most aircraft articles are named by their manufacturer, then by name and/or designation number, for example Boeing 747, Supermarine Spitfire. Articles should always be named as generally as possible, so an article should only be named after a subtype (e.g. Messerschmitt Bf 109G) if writing about that specific version of the aircraft. Usually this will mean that we already have a more general article about the aircraft, relevant to all subtypes. If no general article exists, it may be worthwhile expanding the article slightly so that it encompasses all variants of the aircraft. [edit] IntroductionEvery article should begin with a short introduction naming the aircraft, its manufacturer(s), and the general category of aircraft it belongs to. For example:
Without going any further, a reader should already have a good basic idea of what kind of aircraft the article is describing. [edit] InfoboxIf the article is of moderate length or longer, an infobox is often a good way to sum up relevant information. {{Infobox Aircraft}} presents data such as manufacturer, maiden flight, service entry and retirement dates, number produced, and other quick facts in a fairly attractive and concise fashion. For the most part, as there is an appropriate field in the infobox itself, including the manufacturer in the "name" field is not necessary. Some exceptions exist, such as aircraft which only have model numbers. Based on several past discussions, the infobox is purely optional, though infoboxes including specifications are frowned upon. {{Infobox Aircraft}} was designed with input from the project and its use is encouraged. [edit] BodyThe body of the article describes the aircraft in greater detail. This information is often best arranged in sections, especially in longer articles. Some frequently used sections in aircraft articles include any and all of the following:
[edit] Aircraft specifications
This is a short summary of aircraft's characteristics and performance. If an article doesn't have specifications, you can either tag the article with {{aero-specs}} or add them yourself. Please use the new {{Aircraft specifications}} conditional template when adding specifications; details and a brief explanation are available on the template's talk page. You can either copy-and-paste the template into the page or type {{subst:airspec-imp}} for imperial (metric) units or {{subst:airspec-met}} for metric (imperial) units where the Specifications section would go. The blank template will be inserted when you save the page. By convention, specifications are laid out as follows: [edit] Specifications (variant described)General characteristics
Performance
Note that these specifications should relate to a specific variant of the aircraft, and be labelled accordingly. Usually this will be the most famous/noteworthy/numerous one.
See Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Units for a more detailed discussion of units. [edit] Engine specificationsPiston engines (all reciprocating engines, including rotary engines) Please use the Pistonspecs template. [edit] Specifications (variant described)General characteristics
Components
Performance
Jet engines (includes turbojets, turbofans, turboprops, and turboshafts) [edit] Specifications (variant described)General characteristics
Components
Performance
[edit] UnitsFor general Wikipedia conventions on units, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers). See Units page for conversion factors. [edit] Thrust-to-weight ratioThe main purpose of having this ratio specified is to compare different engines and vehicles. We therefore need to be as consistent as possible within the wikipedia; and as consistent as possible with external sources. The main difficulty is that whilst thrust has units of force, Weight here can either mean mass (kg or lb) or force due to gravity (N or lbf). If the latter, the figure is characteristically dimensionless and requires no conversion. Note that any metric and imperial unit usage must be consistent- use of lb's or kg's implies a thrust/mass ratio is specified. Preferred:
Acceptable in some cases:
Deprecated:
[edit] Specific ImpulseThe correct units for specific impulse are seconds in both imperial and SI units. (See Rocket Propulsion Elements by George P. Sutton and Oscar Biblarz, seventh edition et al). Therefore no conversion need be employed. Sometimes specific impulse is incorrectly, but not unusually listed as a velocity or as Ns/kg. This is in fact a different quantity known as 'c', the effective exhaust velocity. This can take the units m/s (or equivalently, from Newton's third law Ns/kg) or ft/s. Its use is deprecated, but may be employed if quoted by a manufacturer, or added in addition to the specific impulse. [edit] Aircraft unit costsA helpful essay on understanding how different types of aircraft costs are reported, what they mean, and whether they should be used in an article or the {{infobox Aircraft}} is User:Askari Mark/Understanding aircraft unit costs. It is recommended that flyaway cost for military aircraft or retail price for commercial aircraft be used in the Infobox Aircraft since these are the most commonly available costs and thus provide readers with a means for “apples and apples” comparison of relative costs. [edit] Popular cultureA "Popular culture" section should be avoided per Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles unless the appearances are especially notable. This section should not be a compendium of every trivial appearance, but significant ones of relevance to the airframe. The canonical example would be Top Gun for the F-14 Tomcat. Due to the large number of survey and arcade simulations, an effort should be made to avoid tallying every sim appearance unless there are very few of them. Fictional versions and speculation about fictional likenesses should not be included, as they constitute original research. [edit] See alsoThis section contains links to other aircraft-related material in Wikipedia. There is a template available, {{Aircontent}} , with parameters for the below sections as well as external links. It also automatically includes the {{airlistbox}} template described below. By convention, this section includes:
[edit] ReferencesThis section contains details of print references and/or external links to websites used in the article. Wikipedia prefers the APA format, so that's what we should use as well (see here for a comprehensive example set, and here for a list of templates). To integrate your references into the article, please use the reference tags. Examples of citations:
There are also templates that allow the automatic formatting of references based on the information you have available; for websites, use {{cite web | }}, and for books, use {{cite book | }}. [edit] External linksThis section contains links to external websites that were not reference material for the article, such as image sites. External links should summarize the website’s contents, and indicate why the website is relevant to the article. For further details see Wikipedia:External links. [edit] NavboxesUsually, we include a few navboxes to tie together aircraft by the same manufacturer or designated under the same sequence. The article ends with a final navbox that links together the bulk of Wikipedia's aviation content:
This can also be implemented simply by typing {{Aviation lists}}, which adds the footer template at the end of the article. [edit] CategoryAircraft are categorised primarily by their nationality, role, and era, for example Category:British airliners 1960-1969. A number of secondary categories also exist that link together aircraft with certain noteworthy features, such as Category:Swing-wing aircraft. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Categories for a full description of the Category system. [edit] Hints, tips, and finishing touchesRemember wherever possible to link the powerplants and weapons, preferably in the article, but in the table if not mentioned in the text. Where appropriate, use "year in aviation", instead of "year" (e.g. [[2004 in aviation|2004]] instead of [[2004]]). Add significant events pertaining to the aircraft to the "year in aviation" page. When you're done, please make sure to add your new article to list of aircraft, new powerplants to list of aircraft engines, and new weapons to the list of aircraft weapons. (Then, above them, there's also list of aircraft manufacturers and list of aircraft engine manufacturers and list of aviation topics,...) [edit] Creating a new aircraft pageYou can pre-fill a new aircraft page with all elements of the layout as follows:
Finally, remember that you're in no way obliged to follow all, or even any, of these guidelines to contribute an article. |