User talk:Wikitiful

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I have not been of a sock puppet or vandal of Christina McHale. I only created this account since I had seen the wikipedia article before it was deleted and wanted it to be put under deletion review when I saw that it no longer exists. If you feel that I am a sock puppet you are completely wrong and I have not even made any edits to wikipedia, only put an article for deletion review. I know Christina McHale and I feel that the article does not have any valid reason to be deleted since it is not false information, is not one-sided, or does not violate any privacy because this information about her is already on the internet. Please unblock me because you are wrong and I have not even done anything wrong to wikipedia and you are saying that I am a sock puppet or a vandal. How can you even make a presumption that I am a sock puppet or a vandal when there is no established history, or anything but putting something under deletion review which is perfectly complying with the rules of wikipedia. Just because this is a shared computer, all other users are presumed to do something when nothing has even been done. No vandalism was even done either by deletion review. If any wikipedian feels an article should not be deleted, it can be put under deletion review; it is fine and I am presumed a vandal and blocked indefinitely for only that? This is totally unfair and I must be unblocked. I have not violated ANY rules of wikipedia!"

Decline reason: "So... your first edit just happens to be a DRV request of an apparently sock-attracting article? Sure. — Sandstein 23:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "UNFAIR! I did nothing wrong on wikipedia, I am declined by a request to be unblocked when nothing wrong has been done, and you are just suspecting me of doing something when I have done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. I am completely innocent until proven guilty and I have not been guilty of vandalism which is PROVEN by me not doing anything to wikipedia. It is perfectly fine to put an article under deletion review and just because it is my first edit you cannot suspect me to be a sock-puppet of some sort or a vandal. I created an account recently and I wanted an article under deletion review which is perfectly fine under wikipedia. I want the policy to have justice with it. I am INNOCENT and have not vandalized anything! If I have done nothing wrong, I want be unblocked. Unblock me because this is unfair and I am NOT a sock-puppet. If you think I am, where is your SOLID PROOF of guilt. You are making too many presumptions and an innocent person should not be blocked just out of suspicion. UNBLOCK ME!"

Decline reason: "So...you are a brand new editor and you are aware of an article which was deleted numerous times and you also immediately know how to put up an article for deletion review? You also make the same basic arguments for inclusion that previously blocked editors did. WP:DUCK. Denied. — IrishGuy ^talk 00:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I demand that this be appealed to a higher administrator above all of you. I have done nothing wrong on wikipedia and I want to be unblocked. Deletion review is perfectly legal and that is only what I did. I did not even make any edits, let alone vandalize. Why should I just be blocked? I share this computer and just because others all do edits that are considered vandalism, I should not be affected. I knew that those articles were deleted because the others were blocked so I put an article under deletion review because I knew about Christina McHale and I had seen it before. I do not want you to presume me guilty of something before even any edit is made or an article is created. I am innocent and this is absolutely UNFAIR! I have done nothing and that is proven by what I have edited which is only for a legal deletion review. DELETION REVIEW IS NOT VANDALISM! I am not anything you suspect me to be and I want a fair appeal. How can you presume me to be a sock puppet, meat puppet, or a vandal when nothing wrong has been done on my part? Please unblock me and be fair! I have had it with you treating me like being guilty of something when nothing is wrong about deletion review. You are making too big of a deal for what I did not even do and saying that I am a vandal. I am not and I better be unblocked. If you all still disagree with unblocking me, please respond to me by telling me what higher authority I may appeal to on wikipedia in order to unblocked and how to do it because this is totally UNFAIR! Please just unblock me because I am not guilty of anything and I do not want this type of treatment when nothing has been done!"

Decline reason: "Stop requesting unblock. Denied. —Pilotguy cleared for takeoff 18:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.