From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] March 2007
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Orange Mike 02:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 3 Revert warning
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Hinduism. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Abecedare 22:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Please discuss your edits on the Hinduism talk page before inserting them in the article. Sevral, if not all, of your changes are factually incorrect, not neutrally phrased and/or seem to be pushing a point of view. Therefore they have been reverted by several editors. Continuing down this path may be construed as vandalism and you are liable to be blocked from editing articles on wikipedia. Abecedare 00:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hinduism, you will be blocked from editing. Abecedare 01:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I promise never to vandalize again or to do anything to the article Hinduism. I feel it is unfair to impose an indefinite block on editing and I will not ever edit Hinduism again. I did not know that I could be blocked indefinitely for something like this and I did not know better which wrongs I will admit to. Wikipedia also needs to admit wrong by considering me a sock puppet or meat puppet because I am not and that is wrong. I will not vandalize again and I do not want a false name with also a block that is indefinite since I do not consider it to be fair. Though I am at fault for the Hinduism edits, I am not at fault for any other and I beg you to please give me another chance and allow me to edit wikipedia again and I will not abuse anything or make false edits. Please reverse my indefinite block and give me another chance."
Decline reason: "You obviously knew you could be blocked for your behavior because there are warnings above which told you. Denied. — IrishGuy talk 23:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I do not agree with "IrishGuy" when he said that I still should be blocked. I admitted to carelessness and not following anything and I was not properly thinking. I strongly feel that I should be unblocked and I vow never to vandalize wikipedia again. Also, I am NOT a sock puppet or a meat puppet. If I am only given another chance which no one is giving me, I will prove that I will not vandalize wikipedia again. I do not want an indefinite block and I need to be given another chance. I want to appeal to an administrator other than "IrishGuy" and I want another chance. Please give me that chance."
Decline reason: "Sorry, but you are clearly one in a chain of sockpuppets of User:Wikitful, User:Worthamule, User:Worthadonkey, et cetera. Your main account, Worthadonkey, is blocked for 6 months but not indefinitely. In 6 months, you may return, but continuing use of sockpuppets will result in continued blocks. Mangojuicetalk 14:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
