User talk:Wikiarrangementeditor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

As I have told you numerous times, it is not acceptable to revert without explaining clearly why you are doing so. Please discuss your edits on the appropriate talk page and learn to sign your posts as explained by the bot in the above section. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Do not revert again or you will be reported to WP:ANI/3RR and will likely be blocked again. The source you wish to add comes from a GT-R fan blog and doe not conform to WP:RS or WP:V if something is unclear please ask. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Nordschleife fastest lap times. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 09:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nissan GT-R article

Please try to be more neutral on the nissan GT-R article. I have read many of your edits and I do not think you are maintaining a neutral point of view on the article. I like the Nissan GT-R as much as you do, but you must remember that wikipedia is not a place to show off your favourite cars. It is simply a place to outline the facts regarding the cars. We must not use wikipedia in an attempt to show the world how great the GT-R is; rather, the facts should speak for themselves. Also, remember that in situations where the facts are uncertain, is it better to simply state that the facts are uncertain, rather than taking an opinion on the matter. Hugzz (talk) 00:11, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I am a believer of GT-R. However, the untrue information is not put. Information on other cars has been treated equally. The problem is a thing that not me but you have treated only GT-R discriminating. Material even is not submitted about other cars at all though official material of GT-R is thoroughly doubted. The source is only a name of the magazine. And, the rumor that GT-R had used cut slick tire was a false rumor. However, the thing to use semi slicks tire is common sense in Porsche GT2. Why do you want to conceal true information though you published information on the lie many times? The believer of Porsche should apologize.--Wikiarrangementeditor (talk) 06:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:9071115 002 1L.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:9071115 002 1L.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GT-R again

You will need to provide sources that indicate the V Spec name will continue. There are numerous sources indicating that it may change to Spec V. You are changing the text of a well referenced section and could be blocked again if you continue. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 04:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

http://www.answers.com/topic/nissan-skyline "R32 Models:GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (206 kW, 368 Nm) 4WD also NISMO, V-Spec and V-Spec II variants." and "Active LSD came standard on all V-spec R33 GT-R Skylines." and "R34 Models:GT-R V-Spec GT-R V-Spec II GT-R M-Spec GT-R V-Spec II Nür GT-R M-Spec Nür"--Wikiarrangementeditor (talk) 05:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes I am aware that the V spec name was used on Skyline GT-Rs, but to reliable sources indicate that the Spec V name will be used on the new GT-R. I hope this is clear as other users have tried to explain this to you. Please ask if you have any questions. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Please the source "New GT-R is SpecV". Mizuno is using only a temporary name "SP model".

Here are the two sources used in the article, both confirm the Spec V name and both are reliable [1], [2]. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 05:42, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Edmunds.com introduces NISSAN GT-R with TMS07 as "Japanese Supercar". There might not be necessity of our discussion if giving priority to the journalist's guess.Your priority level is always contradicted.

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —EncMstr 05:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Nissan GT-R. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. There was no reasonable rationale given for replacing a good-quality image with one of possible lower quality and/or resolution. Please use the discussion page at Nissan GT-R instead of edit warring, and please cease the pointless character assaults. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nissan GT-R. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please revert to the previous version (not acknowledging that it is the correct version) to prevent any consequences from violating 3RR. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Nissan GT-R. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 13:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)