User talk:WikiWitch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome message

Welcome!

Hello WikiWitch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Mrsteviec 17:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] London infobox

It is useful, relevant information and does no harm. It isn't like there is an economy of space and Wikipedia is not paper. The fact that it doesnt appear on other city infoboxes is irrelevant, perhaps it should be? And even if not, there is no benefit to uniformity for uniformities sake. The information should only be removed if it is not relevant or does harm. In this case it is neither. Mrsteviec 11:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:ThamesContinuity.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ThamesContinuity.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Celebrity Big Brother 2007 (UK)

Hi, when editing Celebrity Big Brother 2007 (UK), please try to keep the article to a neutral point of view. For example, you have made several edits to Jack's section about the way he speaks and his connection to Jade Goody. It would be preferable if you worded them to say something like source x argues that... so that it is clear that Wikipedia is not trying to express an opinion, but is merely reporting on opinions that exist. Additionlly, you will notice that your edits have been reverted several times and you have re-added them. It would be better to discuss your addition on the talk page in this case, rather than re-adding your edits (see WP:3RR). Thanks. Tra (Talk) 23:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] London

Please stop deleting the photo of London's mayor Ken Livingstone from the London page as you did 1 March (and previously) without comment or justification. See the talk page if you want to delete it, add a comment there first please as to why exactly. Also, please don't blank people's comments on this talk page, it is against WP policies to do that. MarkThomas 22:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk page comment removal

Hi. I just wanted to ask if you could please stop removing messages from your talk page. Most people don't like it when someone does this. If you'd like to keep this page clean, you can archive it. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page for details.) ยท AndonicO Talk 13:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eh, regarding official sources:

User:FFMG has said that the Financial Times does work as an official source. Were you thinking, by any chance, that an official source needs to be a website, or gathered from online material? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 20:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to United Kingdom and France: There have been long discussions on this topic and a consensus has been reached. In the future, please use the talk page before introducing controversial changes, especially if they go against a wide consensus among other users. As for "official sources", there is no Wikipedia policy that would disqualify Financial Times as a perfectly valid source. JdeJ (talk) 11:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)