User:Wiki104

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hi,

I think it would be better to obtain a wide consensus from multi-lingual users rather than concentrating upon American English users. Because American English is the modern French or Latin does not mean that it is not thoroughly broken. Please it would be nice to allow a German or a Greek a chance to read something informative rather than superfluous and uncommunicative jargon : which is meaningless outside of the box.

Actually I am a native Brit, but have learnt to speak the old English which is now an extinct language. I agree that the trends in language transition happened in the 1800s but the last 40 years has been phenomenal also especially within America : a sport commentary from the 1950s American culture is a different language than Emminem. Unfortunately at Britain it is very unpolitically correct to talk about the working class these days, but that does not alter the social history whereby the "educated" classes had all the money and learnt to speak the grammatically wrong versions of the transitive language of the 19th century. They also learnt to laugh down what they did not understand : such as the rules of old English. However the British Empire was full of people who were uneducated who spoke proper grammar. As a consequence pockets of proper grammar have been left behind at places like nigeria and india. Because WIKI is aimed TO TRANSFER KNOWLEDGE by the DEVELOPING world I think it approbate to package it sufficiently, especially re. internet technologies.

IF YOU ARE A NON-AMERICAN NON-BRIT by language please can you assist by providing a comment on the discussion by one of my contributions because the grammar of the American language is fundamentally ill-founded and contradicts the rules of all reasonable linguistic structures, which is not a useful trait : Kurt Kobain may have called it "something in the way".Wiki104 19:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)