User talk:Wi Account ki
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Wi Account ki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! JACOPLANE • 2007-04-18 22:00
Contents[hide] |
[edit] TimeSplitters 2
Hey about your edit when you removed the trivia section, I think it would be better to keep that in there until you can integrate it into proper sections of the article. Also I'd recommend using edit summaries from now on (the box at the bottom) so people know what you're doing and why. Finally, you might want to add something to your userpage since it makes your name a red link when nothing is there.--Clyde (talk) 04:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- PP means paragraph, and I reccommend that the reception be expanded. Perfect Dark has some more critical opinions, and more quotes about what they really liked or didn't like. If the text is expanded, I think the publication box should be expanded too (it has no name, I made one up, but yes it's the box with all the scores). I think the external links are good, but if you use the IGN review in the reception section, I would say leave it out of the external links. I'd also say to add "expand reception" onto your nifty list.--Clyde (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Perfect Dark
- I'm just wondering if you can explain what form of improvement can be made to improve Perfect Dark, already a featured article, as per your contribution to its discussion page. Connell66 09:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reply
Sorry for the wait, I haven't been on much. If you didn't just look on your own, this says it all. It's really your choice and what suits the article better, although gameplay first is preferred.--Clyde (talk) 00:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- I suppose you can mention it in the legacy or something, just make sure it is referenced, encyclopedic, prose, and non-trivial. I'm wary, but go ahead. BTW, it's not in good taste to go around mocking other articles on their talk page. People who consider the article their opus at an immature stage will and have taken offense. Those people are in the same boat as us, trying to improve articles.--Clyde (talk) 02:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:TS2 Spacestation.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TS2 Spacestation.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:TS2 Japan.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TS2 Japan.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Andyreply 23:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TS2 Chicago.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TS2 Chicago.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)