User talk:Whohe!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Images

Whohe, Thanks for your edits in Greg Matthews but copyrighted images are not allowed to be used in wikipedia. Tintin 22:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

I've now tagged your images with the "no license" template. All images have to have not only a source (which you supplied, thank you) but also a copyright tag explaining why we're allowed to use it. In most cases, we cannot use photos taken from other websites, unless we have the permission of the photographer or photo agency.
If an image doesn't have a source and a copyright tag, it is liable to be deleted any time after a seven-day waiting period.
I'm sorry about that, after you took the trouble to find the images. The articles look much better with images, but unfortunately it's illegal to use them, and as one of the top sites on the web we're likely to get sued if we do.
Thanks,
Stephen Turner (Talk) 12:09, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Cricket

Welcome to Wikipedia! You may wish to join WikiProject Cricket, a project that organises all the information on cricket here. Help is always needed and appreciated! DaGizza Chat (c) 04:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] South African FC cricket teams

Thanks for the articles on South African cricket teams - I was planning to do them myself but I really appreciate that you've done them. By the way, where did you find the information on what regions the teams represent? Sam Vimes 19:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wicked Picture

Thanks for the kind comments! Yes I was on the train when I took it, as noted on the original upload, here:-[[1]] Richard Harvey 09:15, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

I noted you wanted some uncopyrighted photo's - I've just added some images to Huddersfield_railway_station, Huddersfield, Lockwood_railway_station, Lockwood, Paddock and started an article for Beaumont Park plus more photo's for Brockholes railway station, Brockholes, Berry_Brow railway station and Honley. Richard Harvey 19:08, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

    • I've just added some photo's and a section on the pub saga to the Castle Hill article. could you check my summing up of the Thandi brothers action and ensure it's correct please. Richard Harvey 23:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Placement

Whohe, Hi! Just to let you know that I have put the images you changed, (Huddersfield & District), back to the original placings I used when I uploaded the images and or created the articles. I would like them to be first, but it is against Wikipedia guidlines to do so as leading text should always come first. It's better to do that before more - strict - editors decide to change everything around. I had this problem a long time back and was taken to bits by administrators then. The guidelines do allow for images up to 550px to be used. So I have a policy of changing those back as well, some people only have 800x600px monitors but most these days are 1280 - 1400 on 15" and 17" screens so 500px is an average size. Also I note you still have Berry Brow Rail Station and Lockwood on your required picture list. I have uploaded those images also. Richard Harvey 14:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leeds

Hi. This is an odd question, so I came direct to your page seeing as you seem to have done most of the maintaining on "Leeds districts" and "Leeds environs". Is Middleton actually part of the city? If you look at the talk page for Middleton, Leeds, I asked if this is right. However, I don't think that article is exactly the most popular on Wikipedia.

[edit] License tagging for Image:Nikeairmax90.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Nikeairmax90.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Railway stations

Hey - just a note to say well done on the railway station articles. I remember creating many of those, and its great to see them worked on and improved =) Keep up the good work man doktorb wordsdeeds 07:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

I've seen lots that you've worked on and they look in fine shape! Keep up the good work. Fraslet 19:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Usage

To save edits, can you use the 2004 - 2005 usage update and also use "exits0405". Simply south 13:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't forget the years as well by replacing "exits" with "exits0405". Simply south 16:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.

Whohe!

[edit] License tagging for Image:Wembleystat.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Wembleystat.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Wembleystatbridge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wembleystatbridge.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lowerhouses

Hi Whohe! I just noted your edit to the article, whilst patrolling with wiki VandalProof, and wondered why you removed the infobox template from the article. The general idea is to put those in every article that is about a place/location. So it may just end up getting put back by some editor in the future? Richard Harvey 19:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Richard Harvey,

Ta for your comment.

The infobox yes is a noble idea but Lowerhouses is not relevant enough to warrant it. It's really a district og Hudds. Villages and towns, yes of course they should have infoboxes.

Whohe! 15:12 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Suburbs of Huddersfield

Hi, I see that you have removed some of the more obscure 'suburbs' of Huddersfield, however I think that a few of them, specifically Cowmes, Greenside & Rashcliffe do actually deserve to stay, as they are recognised areas of the town. I've added them back with a couple of others. --Thozza 21:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Perth Challenge

Thanks for your feedback on the Challenge and Simon Davis articles. Actually, it was another user who deleted the 'mullet' and the 'world's saddest maths teacher lines; I simply reinstated the latter because it was so funny. I'm currently working on some women's cricket stuff but after that, I might have to attack the Nehru Cup and the World Championship of Cricket. And yes, I do remember the Perth Challenge of 1987 and I even still have the official program (minus a few player pictures which I cut out for a primary school assignment).

inxia 05:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Playboy Special Editions Models Category

Hello BetacommentBot,

Why was this category removed ?

I found it useful to see who had been a modelled in the Playboy Special Editions.

I would be grateful if you will reply.

Thank you

--Whohe! 18:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

there was a WP:CFD that deleted the cat off hand i dont know the date. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 18:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Heavy Woollen Category

You may have noticed that I added Ossett, Morley, Horbury, etc. to the Heavy Woollen District category. I notice that you said that the group was to be based around North Kirklees, and I was just wondering whether you mind the inclusion of non-Kirklees towns/villages? I do think that it would be inappropriate to have a Heavy Woollen category without Ossett though, as it was always seen as one of the main centres of the shoddy trade - certainly more than Mirfield or the Spen Valley was! Give us a message back; just didn't want to mess up your category Epa101 11:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Epa101, i set up the category so that the towns and villages in the North Kirklees area could belong somewhere. The title Heavy Wollen District fit as historically the area was known for it and it is a more interesting title than North Kirklees.

I think it is fine that Ossett is included as it produced the goods.

Ta for your message.

--Whohe! 13:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Southken.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Southken.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 03:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Southkenton.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Southkenton.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 03:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cmon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cmon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:ColneV100.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ColneV100.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Michelle Clack

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Michelle Clack, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~ BigrTex 15:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Huddersfield

Hi! Apologies! without having my brain in gear I reverted your last edit to the Huddersfield article, whilst I was browsing through in history mode. When I realised what I had done I took another closer look and decided to add a section to include nearby places, in addition to the local suburbs. This I hope will help save some confusion over what is or isn't part of Huddersfield. Could you take a look and see what you think? Richard Harvey 19:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:XLRec5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLRec5.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Handbra

Handbra has been proposed for deletion and needs your two-fisted support. Handbra thanks you. H Bruthzoo 08:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Woodhouseridge9999.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:Woodhouseridge9999.JPG and also as Image:Woodhouseridge999.JPG. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Reebokclassic909.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Reebokclassic909.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:EJA1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:EJA1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Black Falcon (Talk) 22:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Water Orton railway station

I've reverted your recent edits to Water Orton railway station; they were not, as you claimed, "minor"; and included the undeclared and unexplained removal of content. Andy Mabbett 13:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Maybe I should have explained the changes I made in detail. All I did was state which district the station is in (North Warwickshire) as that space on the page is currently blank.
Plus I stated as what service to expect at Water Orton incase I or someone else ever waited there. I deleted the mention of London after consulting current rail timetables produced by Central Trains as there is no longer a direct service.
In future if i make any changes, I will explain below to the world.
ta
--Whohe! 17:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
You also removed the latitude and longitude parameters. Andy Mabbett 17:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm willing to believe the latitute/longitude parameters were removed by accident. However, Whohe! is probably advised to read WP:MINOR as soon as possible: adding extra content and removing incorrect content shouldn't ever count as "minor" (even if they don't seem important to you at the time). --RFBailey 21:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2005-2006

Well, i've updated them on WP:Rail's main page. Anyway, here is the link for you. Why not join? Simply south 17:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Orbitalthealt.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Orbitalthealt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:18 Headingley.jpg

I have copied your image over to Wikimedia Commons, where it is now named Image:Headingley 2001.jpg. Commons is a repositry for freely-licensed media that, amongst other things, can be used across the many Wikipedia-related projects. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 12:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:CNV00023.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Stonebridgepark999.JPG. The copy called Image:Stonebridgepark999.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 21:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:36autobus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:36autobus.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moor Grange

Thanks for the compliment. I did add a pic but it got deleted by a BOT. I'll try and add it again with the ubiquitous references. Do you know much about Moor Grange? Chilkoot 14:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moor Grange pt 3

I lived there from 1959 till I moved away in '82. Last thing I remember about the 56 was it went from Horsforth to Gipton (or was it Whinmoor).

Just after I moved the Buses were deregulated and all hell was let loose for a few weeks according to my brother. Am currently residing in Essex nr to Stansted in a small town called Great Dunmow. Have you ever visited Moor Grange? Chilkoot 19:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Salford Central 100.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Salfordcentral100.JPG. The copy called Image:Salfordcentral100.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 12:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Mannyairport100.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Mannyairport100.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:09, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Holbecknew2.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Holbecknew.JPG. The copy called Image:Holbecknew.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ponders End railway station

Hi Whohe!.I noticed you added the infobox for this station ,sorry it needs fixing.I had a try but failed.CheersNorthmetpit (talk) 15:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Ta for the prompt. I'll gove it a go !--Whohe! (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLAmerican.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLAmerican.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLRec2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLRec2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLRec3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLRec3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLRec4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLRec4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLRecord5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLRecord5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XLfirst1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XLfirst1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Orbitalinsides.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Orbitalinsides.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Orbitalmiddle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Orbitalmiddle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Minor edit

A minor edit signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous version: typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content, etc. Please don't mark your edits as minor when they are not! (E.g. Settle railway station, Rufford railway station. Thanks. --Dr Greg (talk) 17:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Helensburgh Upper railway station

Please stop removing signalling information from railway station articles. And if you are going to remove any significant pieces of information from an article, please say so clearly in the edit summary ("re-jigg" doesn't suggest removal of content) and do not mark it as a minor edit. Thank you. Signalhead (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Minor edits

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you.

None of the following edits qualify as 'minor':

Signalhead (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Images of rail stations

Pencefn,

Any chance that you could be able to photograph rail stations in the Glasgow/West of Scotland region ?

This would make Wiki entries for these stations more complete.

--Whohe! (talk) 13:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Have some taken over the years. My recent photography expeditions have been concentrating on the Lanarkshire and Ayrshire Railway. However, when I get out with my camera, I will be opportunistic. Kelvinbridge railway station was one of my targets for photography. --Stewart (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment on my Talk page! best, Sunil060902 (talk) 16:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Station distances

I notice that you have been adding distances to the introduction of many station articles, thisn is a useful extra detail. "Traditional" lines in Britain are measured in miles (a topic that has been discussed several times at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways) and so you might like to follow this pattern - it will save a lot of subsequent edits!

You can also get Wiki to do the miles/kilometres conversion for you by using the {{convert}} template. For instance, {{convert|10|mi|km|0}} will appear in an articles as:"10 miles (16 km)" (the last zero is to round the kms to the nearest whole number). Geof Sheppard (talk) 08:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Railway station infobox photos

Hi there, I've noticed that you are often increasing the size of infobox station photos to 300px, or creating them at that size to begin with. Please note that it was agreed on over at the talk page for the infobox that 265px be the recommended photo size. A new field 'image_name' has also been created as a substitute for 'image', which will hardcode the photo to 265px. This is by no means compulsory for you to do, but at 300px the infobox ends up being stretched, and 265px is about the maximum a photo can fit in without stretching. Eventually (hopefully!) all photos will be hardcoded to 265px.

Nevertheless, good work on the photos you have uploaded this evening! --- Dreamer 84 19:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:1986 WSC.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1986 WSC.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:OrbitalVert.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OrbitalVert.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 21:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:OrbitalGreenone.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OrbitalGreenone.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 21:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:OrbitalVert.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:OrbitalVert.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC) --Sdrtirs (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:OrbitalGreenone.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:OrbitalGreenone.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC) --Sdrtirs (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tynemouth Metro station

The article infobox specifies the location (and wikilinks it too) to give the article context - along with the rest of the article content. Wikilinking the first mention of Tynemouth on its own should be sufficient, without having to state the fact in the text. That's why wikilinks are so useful, you keep the narrative flowing, and people who desire more information (where is Tynemouth?) can click it to find out. Ta. DrFrench (talk) 19:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)