User:Who/Discussion log/Sort

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Database groveling, again

Hi, I've been offline for a while (sick, and then catching up on more important stuff. I'm not checking my talk: page much, so please use email (jnc AT mit DOT edu) to communicate. Not sure if you still need anything from me - I see JamesDay did an update run.

Without the error message from wkf, I don't know what it was unhappy about; since it successfully processed a chunk consisting of about 10% of the database before (back when we were having the truncation problems) when I ran it on my machine, I'm curious as to what the problem might be. It doesn't do anything fancy, just uses STDIO, so it should run OK on your machine. It does use an line input buffer of 16MB (some nitwit vandals have been amusing themselves putting huge entries in the database), but that's all that's unusual about it. It shouldn't need any special flags to compile; I just used "cc -o wkf wkf.c" IIRC.

My database counter (wkc) uses the following kinds of entries: <contributor> (which include <username> and <id> entries as subentries; it actually uses the ID field to avoid having to create its own indexes, although technically I could, but since they were already there I decided to just use them), <title> (to get the namespace), and <timestamp> (to know when the edit was made). It's completely done, and functional - it worked fine on the truncated database a couple of months ago.

If you can get me a reduced copy of the database (i.e. without the <text> entries) wkc should produce the output list of counts just fine (not sorted, is all - I didn't feel like adding the sort, seemed like a waste of time). Noel (talk) 17:44, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion on Lott postings

You wrote me about discussing my edits and for that matter the edits of others who have tried to fix this posting. I have tried repeatedly to discuss these issues in the discussion section and all I get back is "no." (by number of words over 90 percent of the discussion in Sections 18, 19, and 20 are postings that I have offered. (Section 21 is almost exclusively a recopying from elsewhere.) Despite my extensive efforts in only a couple of cases do I get a useful response back and even when I offer to compromise 100 percent on those couple of mentions, the ultimate response is "no change" and no explanation is offered. The same thing has happened to Al Lowe and others. If you have a suggestion, I am open to it, but I don't know what to do. Given that Al and I have tried to make real efforts to discuss this, why is it that our posts are removed, but those on the other side face no discussion of sanctions?Timewarp 15:03, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Titoxd's RfA

Thank you!
Thank you!

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA. I never thought I would get so much support! Thanks to your help, my nomination was the 10th most supported RfA in Wikipedia history. Now, please keep an eye out on me while I learn the new tools, ok? Thanks again! Titoxd(?!?) 18:17, 25 October 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Peter Stadlen

In the Peter Stadlen article you wrote that he died 1996 and assisted Mozart. This must be erroneous. Punkmorten 21:19, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

I didn't cite sources, just adding to a stub article which could become a good resource. «»Who?¿?meta 21:45, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If I can't make an Alpha page than no one can. Everybody told me not to make one. But he has to put one on. So KEEP THAT REDIRECTION ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

[edit] Peter Stadlen article clearly nonsense

How the heck does someone who helped Mozart compose his music die in 1996!?! WTF

That IP address was clearly full of nonsense, Please explain your actions.

Thank You Bubbleboys 22:05, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

As I said, I did not cite sources, I just tried to improve a stub article. Secondly, please read WP:Civil, telling someone to "explain your actions" can seem harsh. If another admin feels strongly about it,they can delete it. «»Who?¿?meta 22:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] concerning the manifesto revert

--67.184.163.248 22:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC)Ikiroid Ok, sorry about the whole hacker manifesto edit, but i figured that it wasnt a big deal, seeing as how the whole hacker manifesto thing is on many websites anyway, including some of the sites cited at the end of the article. You can edit it back, whatever, I dont want to get in an edit war about it.

[edit] includeonly/noinclude

Please don't use these tags on {{cfd}} and related deletion-templates. Since {{afd}} should always be subst'ed, people have a tendency to subst other deletion templates as well, and if those contain any includeonly/noinclude bits it rather messes up the relevant article and some categories. Thanks. Radiant_>|< 17:27, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Your monobook.js

Hey, I noticed your message over at MediaWiki talk:Blockiptext about your javascript links on user pages, and they looked really nice, so I wanted to use them. However, I can't seem to get the block, block log, arin, and contribs tab to show up. Any ideas on what I did wrong? I belive I copied the code correctly. Link to my monobook.js if you want to check it out: User:GregAsche/monobook.js. No worries if it takes you a while to respond due to the hurricane. -Greg Asche (talk) 06:17, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Hey, I fixed it on your monobook.js, I think :). Let me know if it works or not. I tested it on my bot account, and it seemed to work. I don't think it works with IE though, I'm using Firefox. «»Who?¿?meta 22:37, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Thanks, that fixed it. I was clearing my cache, and using the latest firefox by the way... -Greg Asche (talk) 22:54, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Comments about rollback

Hiya Who, I just read your comments about the javascript rollback on Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship. I would invite you to read two sections of the talk page for the requests for rollback privileges proposal, "Why is this necessary?" and "Low Bandwidth User Interest" which explain why the javascript rollback is not a solution for some people - you may not have considered this! Cheers, Talrias (t | e | c) 17:05, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Hi, I will try to read all of the comments when I get time. I scrolled thru them and see some of your point. I will express my opinion on that page when time permits. Thanks. «»Who?¿?meta 22:39, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Godspeed your recovery from Wilma

I'm in much the same boat, recovering from Wilma - fortunately, I got power back pretty quick, but the city is still a mess! Good luck! BD2412 T 05:01, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Happy Diwali

Tamaso ma jyotir gamaya ( Lead me from darkness to light.)Wish you Happy Diwali - P R A D E E P Somani (talk) Feel free to send me e-mail.
Tamaso ma jyotir gamaya ( Lead me from darkness to light.)
Wish you Happy Diwali
- P R A D E E P Somani (talk)
Feel free to send me e-mail.

[edit] Thanks

Image:WikiThanks.png Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my userpage :-) Kirill Lokshin 02:06, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] A request for the Whobot!

Hi. I saw you are the owner of Whobot. It would be great if you could run this script for me:

MOVE_CONTENTS Category:Arges Category:Argeş
MOVE_CONTENTS Category:Braila Category:Brăila
MOVE_CONTENTS Category:Brasov Category:Braşov
MOVE_CONTENTS Category:Caras-Severin Category:Caraş-Severin
MOVE_CONTENTS Category:Dambovita Category:Dâmboviţa
MOVE_CONTENTS Category:Maramures Category:Maramureş
MOVE_CONTENTS Category:Neamt Category:Neamţ
MOVE_CONTENTS Category:Timis Category:Timiş

These are some categories that do not have their diacriticals (they were created before Wikipedia switched to UTF). After the move they can be speedy deleted according to the policy (as misspelled categories). Thanks. bogdan | Talk 00:29, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Hi, although they are speedy, they need a 48 hour notification. I have posted them on WP:CFD in the speedy section. «»Who?¿?meta 01:26, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Another request

I dumped a script at User talk:Whobot/tasks. It didn't have to do with the sports stuff (which I believe is done), so I didn't want to assume anything. The new stuff is airport cats from speedy (they were listed for at least two days then moved to cleanup). If you want me to do this another way, just let me know. I figure I'd help out since you're limited with access. --Kbdank71 19:21, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Yea that's fine. I was thinking about the same thing earlier, if you want to put stuff in there to be done, I will run them. I am running between here and a friends server so I can keep it running as long as possible. «»Who?¿?meta 19:29, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Oh yea, instead of the date, if u do the usual format, you can just put speedy instead. «»Who?¿?meta 19:30, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Shiny! Do you want me to put new stuff in tasks or tasks talk? I figure it'd be better if you gave my additions a once over, just to make sure I haven't lost my mind at some point. Then again, you can probably check it before running whobot, so either way, it's up to you. --Kbdank71 19:37, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 :) I give them a rough over, and i look at them while its running and some when they are done. I have caught some of my own mistakes as well. Uhm, you can put them on the regular tasks, or on talk, i'll move them over. Also, if they cat already exists, like spanish bball, it will just merge with it, so you dont have to do it manually, unless you want :) I wish I had my pc.. I could do sooo much more. «»Who?¿?meta 19:39, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Think of it as a mini vacation (or holiday as our British friends would say) :) The fort is being held. --Kbdank71 19:49, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 20k

CONGRATS!!! Here's to another 20k. Long live Who! I wish I had some sort of cool award to give out, but I can't really think of any pictures now. Congrats though! -[[User:Mysekurity|Mysekurity]] [[additions | e-mail]] 05:22, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Hey, thanks, the message is good enough, thanks for the note :) «»Who?¿?meta 05:24, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Man, that means I just need 17,000 edits to catch up with you. :P Congratulations! :) Titoxd(?!?) 05:39, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Only 17k??? Oh, that's not a lot <g> «»Who?¿?meta 05:40, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations! Here's to many more... -Splashtalk 17:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

20,000 edits, and you couldn't spent one removing those doggone question marks? Yeah, congrats or whatever. Acetic'Acid 05:35, 4 November 2005 (UTC) :P

[edit] User:Please Don't Block

You got some way to get him/her to stop reverting the warnings? --Nlu 05:35, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Not really. I was going to revert, but didn't see anything really harmful, atm. If too many warnings pile up, it may become an RFC though. Sometimes we keep track of them on a seperate page, or make an archive sub-page on their talk space. I will try to watch what is up, since they blantanly ignored my suggestions. «»Who?¿?meta 05:40, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] On-going vandalism

Diacrit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) (blocked) - persistent user who creates numerous user names to remove Template:Foreignchar from various articles. Created user names include: User:Jeaijij, User:Agraman, User:Oagafauou, User:Qesecaue, User:Uefot, User:Huaelo, User:Bifo, User:Timoa, User:Feoouubiao, User:Eooaqinol, User:Xeuuces, and that's only ones I have caught on recent changes page. Most of them have only 1 edit. And the list keeps growing every second, just look at new user log!!! Please help. Renata3 22:35, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Sorry it took awhile, blocked those listed. If you have anymore contact User:Fvw or User:Curps, they maybe able to block them faster or the IP range they are using. «»Who?¿?meta 23:39, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking them, however, it did not help much. If you check Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Foreignchar there is only talk pages left. When I checked it during the day, there was about 150-200 articles... I suspect that that person created tens (if not hundreds) of user names s/he vandalized... The new user log was just spammed during the day with new users that was his/hers socks. One should have blocked the whole IP... But I guess it's too late and now somebody needs to revert everything. I would love to make a list of the users to block & revert, but I have completely no time. Renata3 03:12, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Hey. Sorry I couldnt do more, limited net access, plus we dont have access to the IP w/o checkuser. I will try to repair some of the damage, and make a list for my bot if there are a lot of articles. «»Who?¿?meta 03:17, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Hey, it's ok. Thank you so much. I was just upset that the vandal got what s/he wanted. At least you are the one who cared :)

Anyways, I did a very stupid thing: instead of studying for my midterm at 9am tomorrow, I stayed till 3am, manually checked new user log from 13:16, 4 November 2005 to 02:55, 5 November 2005 to and came up with this sockpuppet list (it includes your blocked socks; there might be one or two mistakes or omissions). Somebody (I suppose you know more admins than I do) needs to block & revert them (most articles are not yet reverted):

  1. Biwesi (talk · contribs)
  2. Agraman (talk · contribs)
  3. Diacrit (talk · contribs)
  4. Dicrit (talk · contribs)
  5. ZAGOR (talk · contribs)
  6. First Era (talk · contribs)
  7. Peciaile (talk · contribs)
  8. Sipokoia (talk · contribs)
  9. Uihucagopu (talk · contribs)
  10. Tegioucuk (talk · contribs)
  11. Xifieux (talk · contribs)
  12. Aigui (talk · contribs)
  13. Savop (talk · contribs)
  14. Lafohixoye (talk · contribs)
  15. Nuwej (talk · contribs)
  16. Zevicalavao (talk · contribs)
  17. Nosoda (talk · contribs)
  18. Tukao (talk · contribs)
  19. Ouqoxu (talk · contribs)
  20. Mayiuu (talk · contribs)
  21. Limiqa (talk · contribs)
  22. Eujoq (talk · contribs)
  23. Aunufeb (talk · contribs)
  24. Ueuayex (talk · contribs)
  25. Beuiyisu (talk · contribs)
  26. Oeqete (talk · contribs)
  27. Coyokaba (talk · contribs)
  28. Puwo (talk · contribs)
  29. Wawowit (talk · contribs)
  30. Muwuc (talk · contribs)
  31. Pegiuouap (talk · contribs)
  32. Seqoau (talk · contribs)
  33. Setet (talk · contribs)
  34. Yemomihun (talk · contribs)
  35. Eoxewa (talk · contribs)
  36. Yiauia (talk · contribs)
  37. Ausefa (talk · contribs)
  38. Oonefiwe (talk · contribs)
  39. Rineqazo (talk · contribs)
  40. Oagafauou (talk · contribs)
  41. Leauvitop (talk · contribs)
  42. Qonozaxe (talk · contribs)
  43. Zoaeaif (talk · contribs)
  44. Yulugiroaeg (talk · contribs)
  45. Biiabolix (talk · contribs)
  46. Kejerijofo (talk · contribs)
  47. Latotot (talk · contribs)
  48. Biaata (talk · contribs)
  49. Leleqe (talk · contribs)
  50. Gufuce (talk · contribs)
  51. Jeaijij (talk · contribs)
  52. Tiaoza (talk · contribs)
  53. Vuhapo (talk · contribs)
  54. Iuuape (talk · contribs)
  55. Tuwooeg (talk · contribs)
  56. Cibas (talk · contribs)
  57. Auxuqu (talk · contribs)
  58. Kirafioaa (talk · contribs)
  59. Qebokubam (talk · contribs)
  60. Ualamii (talk · contribs)
  61. Muvav (talk · contribs)
  62. Zouu (talk · contribs)
  63. Qesecaue (talk · contribs)
  64. Lawijan (talk · contribs)
  65. Yufifa (talk · contribs)
  66. Ceqi (talk · contribs)
  67. Gifozato (talk · contribs)
  68. Xeuuces (talk · contribs)
  69. Huaelo (talk · contribs)
  70. Uefot (talk · contribs)
  71. Eooaqinol (talk · contribs)
  72. Feoouubiao (talk · contribs)
  73. Bifo (talk · contribs)
  74. Timoa (talk · contribs)
  75. Sieezasur (talk · contribs)
  76. Venil (talk · contribs)
  77. Yauo (talk · contribs)
  78. Vewueozoma (talk · contribs)
  79. Puhug (talk · contribs)
  80. Muyueom (talk · contribs)
  81. Hobimin (talk · contribs)
  82. Cuwig (talk · contribs)
  83. Aokosoo (talk · contribs)
  84. Vegitas (talk · contribs)
  85. Xodiyepomas (talk · contribs)
  86. Wazeyaua (talk · contribs)
  87. Keauloma (talk · contribs)
  88. Vapakidex (talk · contribs)
  89. Bepapeu (talk · contribs)
  90. Qivi (talk · contribs)
  91. Nadopufu (talk · contribs)
  92. Ruhaweh (talk · contribs)
  93. Sudafiha (talk · contribs)
  94. Ceaaeewi (talk · contribs)
  95. Oukeq (talk · contribs)
  96. Xuuir (talk · contribs)
  97. Pabewa (talk · contribs)
  98. Cawiv (talk · contribs)
  99. Peeecaaow (talk · contribs)
  100. Tuvanixai (talk · contribs)
  101. Gifum (talk · contribs)
  102. Ianuuujuf (talk · contribs)
  103. Vewawo (talk · contribs)
  104. Jijol (talk · contribs)
  105. Uuuohimeu (talk · contribs)
  106. Dioijob (talk · contribs)
  107. Tijequ (talk · contribs)
  108. Vikoeuno (talk · contribs)
  109. Fowigete (talk · contribs)
  110. Sozabu (talk · contribs)
  111. Kahigava (talk · contribs)
  112. Yaqu (talk · contribs)
  113. Fuvup (talk · contribs)
  114. Uepo (talk · contribs)
  115. Wejuqov (talk · contribs)
  116. Reyixozipa (talk · contribs)
  117. Rukagop (talk · contribs)
  118. Tioiiuqoau (talk · contribs)
  119. Xoqisunihawu (talk · contribs)
  120. Quiagevo (talk · contribs)
  121. Befis (talk · contribs)
  122. Qediouji (talk · contribs)
  123. Vahode (talk · contribs)

Renata3 07:28, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

I believe that every sock name in the above list is now blocked and their edits reverted. -- Curps 12:34, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks Curps :) «»Who?¿?meta 16:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism by 168.8.230.251

Hi, Have a look at the edit history of this user - it's been nothing but vandalism. I've removed the most recent of it but just realised that for older articles it's probably been removed already - so I'm reverting my reverts now in those cases. Could you issue a warning to the user? Dlyons493 Talk 01:52, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

OK I think I've now got back to the right versions. Sorry about that - I'd done a number of articles before it dawned on me that other people had probably cleaned them up already. Dlyons493 Talk 02:09, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thank you for the revert of my user page. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:26, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] deletion counter

it wouldn't be accurate, because deletion data is only stored for deletetions since the 1.5 upgrade (except in the old deletion log, which isn't really machine readable). sorry. kate.

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for unblocking me!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Empty2005 (talk • contribs) 07:23, 5 November 2005

No prob. «»Who?¿?meta 07:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Relabeling categories

I see you changed a category from "U.S. film directors" to "American film directors." Could you also do this for the category U.S. philanthropists and Category:U.S. businesspeople? Thanks. - Ted Wilkes 16:08, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

This was done thru WP:CFD, a request must be posted there first for the community to discuss it. «»Who?¿?meta 16:13, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] sportts by country renames

Hi - Are you still in need of a list of names for the sports by country renamings? I could spend some time on this today or tomorrow. If yes, please let me know the exact format that would be most useful (I suppose I could dredge through whobot's sourcecode). Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 16:19, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Actually, I think they are all done. I hadn't gone and checked yet though. But if you want to see the format for future reference see User:Whobot/tasks. Thanks. «»Who?¿?meta 16:23, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re:3k

Thanks. :) And as for your sig, I don't know. It just wasn't the same... Acetic'Acid 22:21, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Vw-n wording

People other than those in court make judgements, and on the other hand the origin of "deemed" is also in legal proceeedings -- it is related to "doomed" and once ment a fact determined by a legal process, if i am not mistaken. I think "deemed" souinds a little pretentios in this use, but otherwise does not alter the meaning at all. DES (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

That's actually why I chose the word, same meaning, mostly, but not as "offensive" I think. We are not judge and jury, we are just trying to cleanup vandalism, I think the word "judged" is just too strong and gives a false impression of what we are here to do. IMHO. «»Who?¿?meta 02:06, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Copied to template talk pages for future clarification. «»Who?¿?meta 02:07, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
To me "deemed" is at least as strong, possibly stronger, plus it sounds a bit elitist. But mostly i think that such warning msgs, should be kept in relatively simple english, sienc they may well be addressed to non-native speakers. I think usign a more common word than "deemed" would be better. if you want to soften it, use "belived", but I stand behind "judged" -- the person who reverts vandalism makes a judgement that that is what the edit is. DES (talk) 02:10, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
I agree in both cases, easier and better wording, I just don't like the sound of judged. I just chose deemed to try to stay close to the meaning. Feel free to change it if you have a better word, I would just like to stay away from judged or deemed :) if possible. «»Who?¿?meta 02:12, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User Page Vandalism

I bestow the PSI Award to polite, courteous, and helpful users. It is to be used in good mental health!
I bestow the PSI Award to polite, courteous, and helpful users. It is to be used in good mental health!

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. Accept my person user award, the PSI. -- Psy guy (talk) 03:21, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks :) «»Who?¿?meta 22:24, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User:Jason Bogdanov

I don't have checksum so I can't be 100% sure; you can go ahead and block indefinitely. I'm a little skitish about doing that after I blocked User:O^O indefinitely for spamming User pages, only to realized moments later he was putting up sockpuppet notices! :"D - RoyBoy 800 22:50, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] subst:

I've noticed that sometimes having subst: in a template works well and sometimes it doesn't. It is really interesting that the inappropriate username that I just blocked was so long that it automatically created a shorter fraction of itself that I accidentally added the templates to... --Fire Star 23:48, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pearle update

I just posted new source code...

  • Hey, there's a new response when requesting the page. Yeah, I noticed that when Pearle stopped working. Definitely fixed now.
  • I created getCategoryImages(), probably in response to your note, and added it to depopulateCat().
  • The source has been upgraded to get all articles from a category, instead of just the first 200. I think this obviates the need to use Special:Whatlinkshere as you were. Those lists are sometimes inaccurate (due to a template-related bug - but then, so are category membership lists), and of course they might contain articles that are not actually in the category.

-- Beland 08:04, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Hey thanks for the update. Yea I was only using the Special:Whatlinkshere for the image pages really (like that soccerball.png), not for the cats, just so I could get all those linked articles. Also, the articles sometimes have hardlinked cats that I prefer not to have automatically changed. I also just had it check for images all the time now, so I've been getting those ok, although I may use your code for that after I look at it. I'm incorportating the new "targetSafe" and "pageSafe" features and of course the article 200 limit fix, and some of the other minor fixes you added. I have so many updates of my own now, it's hard to keep track :) Thanks again. «»Who?¿?meta 17:24, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Trailer woes

Sorry to hear about your trailer. Are you eligible for any FEMA money? --Kbdank71 14:20, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Yes, not sure how it's gonna work though. They said they will either give me a check or put me in temporary travel trailer housing (or both) within 10 days. So just 10 more days of living in a parking lot :) I've been looking at condo's for awhile, if I can get all my paperwork finalized, I would like to move into one within a few weeks, but mortgages aren't a fast process, nor is finding a condo in South Florida that allows motorcycles and dogs. I'm alive though, just don't have TV or net access, and those are the "important" things in life </sarcasm>. Finding an apartment down here is oh so fun. Thanks for the note, I didn't get much done with CFD, but it's nice that Bluemoose is helping out, I meant to drop him? (Martin) a thank you note. Er, I just remember I have'nt checked to see if you still needed me to add sort keys to those sport cats or not. «»Who?¿?meta 15:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
    If you don't mind me asking, how are did you type that with no internet? Is it costing you like $200,000 a minute at an internet cafe? Seriously though, I hope you get back on track with a house soon. :) --Celestianpower háblame 15:15, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
Hehe.. I am at my sister's on my laptop, problem is my brother-in-law works at home on the internet and uses a ton of bandwidth, so I can't be on for long periods of time. Internet cafe you ask?? Never, I have a dozen war-driving toolz if it comes down to that ;-p . «»Who?¿?meta 15:18, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] reply

No problem, bluebot did all the work anyway! I don think I could manage without net access for more than a day! I hope your situation improves quickly, thanks Martin 15:56, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Just dropped by to say...

Thanks for the vandalism reversion of my userpage! :) --InShaneee 23:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Outrage by User:169.237.157.182

Thanks for fixing all the mess that he created. 1 hour block won't likely be sufficent, however. He had been blocked previously for 24 hours, and that seemed to have little effect. --tyomitch 23:25, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

I agree, I didn't warn him though, so hopefully they won't bother looking at the length of the block, as if they know how, and just realize they are blocked and stop for now. Its a university IP, so I dont' want to block it for too long. I will watch it for the next few hours. «»Who?¿?meta 23:28, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] PUT MY PAGE BACK UP NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am in tears right now i spent like three hours typing a essay for school on someone we love, and i did mine on Daniel laux, my best friend, and i put it on wikapedia because he is movies and tv show, so hes important, and i spent a lot of time on it and i hit save and TWO SECONDS LATER YOU DELETED IT!!!! i didnt even save it on my computer so now i have to do it ALL AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DO YOU EVEN READ THINGS BEFORE YOU DELETE THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ITS NOT EVEN ABOUT ME, AND ITS IMPORTANT FOR EVERYONE, HE IS A GREAT MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IM CRYING RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOUR A MONSTER!!

  • Geez, Who - this person must be serious - they're talking in ALL CAPS! On the other hand, they're setting the bar for "monster" kinda low. BD2412 02:25, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
<pout> I can be a monster, I can, I can. ;-p «»Who?¿?meta 02:27, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
That's cruel though! Does this mean I cannot write wikipedia articles about my friends???? It's not fair! --Vizcarra 02:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Me cruel? I didn't delete it twice at least, although it merited it, I couldn't find anything on it. But sure one can write about their friends all they want, as long as they feel re-writing them after they get deleted :) that's partially a joke ya'll «»Who?¿?meta 02:36, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
For the record, I found nothing on Google (for what it's worth) indicating that there is any Daniel Laux of encyclopedic notability. BD2412 02:45, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
It's cool, thanks for looking. I'm not a trigger-happy deletionist, but some things are pretty obvious. I don't see any har joking about it on my talk page, it's not like i left them a message about it nagging them. «»Who?¿?meta 02:48, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'M SPEECHLESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHERE DO YOU FIND THEM????????!!!!!!!!!! --Kbdank71 03:24, 15 November 2005 (UTC)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hehe. It's my ever so popular username.. It's an aprhodesiac (and I can't spell). «»Who?¿?meta 03:27, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Yikes...HoneyBee 23:17, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
i knw who daniel is, ive seen him in lights out and a couple other movies, i think his site should be put back up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.106.101.58 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 2 December 2005
the hell? i never wrote that! hey! how dare you add my comment. who the hell is daniel anyway? i made a comment 'cause that's a lot of capslock. HoneyBee 22:28, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Daniel Laux is in Lights Out, I directed it for pete sack! hes a wonderfull actor and you are ignorant.

                - With this much public opion, why don't you just put his site back up, obviously you were wrong, why can't you just admit it???? -Scholar34
  • I was wondering why there wasn't a site for Daniel Laux , you should just put it back up, it saves you the time deleting, it just seems that you have no life. -Jim53yoiu

[edit] Vandals

They don't like me, my page hasn't been vandalised for all of two days. I think that's a record actually... -- Francs2000 01:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

PS I think you're a monster too...
Well thanks, i try my best. ;-) «»Who?¿?meta 01:06, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

who, you shouldn't have deleted that site about daniel laux, i know who he is, he has been in movies and plays all over minnesota and is become a notable figure in the midwest, although he can not be found on google, i dont think thats merrit enough to say hes not important, im going to have to say, put the site back up, or you will get many angry comments from many people in the midwest who see this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.106.101.58 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 2 December 2005

[edit] blocking

No, I'm fine, I think it should be protected for a while. According to what he wrote in Korean, he has access to the computers in Korea Universities, so I think you might be better off just blocking the whole range. (163.152.x.x). This is all because I removed copy vio and POV materials from Korea University page link Man, I never saw Wikipedia this way... -- WB 02:39, 16 November 2005 (UTC) (and about that, you might want to protect Korea University article too.)

  • You might want to protect Korea University article too. -- WB 02:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Oh sorry, have a lot going on, missed the small line there.. :) «»Who?¿?meta 03:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
I realize you're busy, but can you delete some edits that guy made? Pretty serious swearing in there, and I don't even want it on the history either. Thanks. -- WB 03:10, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Yea, I missed the "best" POV language there. I just rv'd rather than removing from history, as that would require deletion/undeletion and merging. I know how to do it, but it can be a pain :) It's normal to leave it in history though, for GFDL purposes. «»Who?¿?meta 03:18, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Yeah... too bad... the language is pretty offensive... It's gotta stay I guess. -- WB 03:56, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Do you mind unblocking it now (my user page)? I hope he doesn't vandalize it again... -- WB 02:35, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Done, sorry it took so long :) «»Who?¿?meta 02:42, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
(belated) Thanks! -- WB 04:00, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Meta

Sorry, I have an account on meta but I'm not an admin there. The same vandal made a huge mess at the HomestarRunner wiki [1]. See also [2] if you don't know what NSMC stands for. -- Curps 02:43, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User:JGXenite

Hi, and thanks for your message. I've now registered the JGXenite account (so I can use the User:JGXenite and User:Jgxenite space without any problems). When I initially registered, I don't think you could have the three capital letters in my username that I normally have, hence the reason I "borrowed" the JGXenite user space.

James

[edit] 64.59.144.21 blocking

Hi Who, thanks for the trust. I do have a Shaw connection, so I don't suppose there's any way for me to get away from the chance of mistaken ID happening. Thanks again. Bookandcoffee(Leave msg.) 01:11, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Featured article protection

Please do not protect the daily featured article - see user:Raul654/protection Raul654 07:04, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Trond_erik_vee_aune

thanks for re deleting this. I'll try to read more carefully next time . Srl 08:20, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

No prob,has happened to me more than once :) «»Who?¿?meta 08:25, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism of Microwave auditory effect's resident nutbar to my user talk page. It really means a lot to see that people will watch for this sort of thing and take action against it... -- Antaeus Feldspar 16:33, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my talk page and blocking User:207.200.116.135. Unfortunitly, he just came back and did it again after the block expired. [3] It really annoys me that AOL users can just avoid getting blocked, even when they are on a fixed IP. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 15:05, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Yea sorry about that. If they do it again, believe me, I will block them for much longer. «»Who?¿?meta 18:07, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
There is no need to apologise. Thanks again. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 18:59, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Emma Watson

Got the note, and I have removed my req at WP:RFPP RadioKirk 04:34, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] GraemeL's RFA

Hi Who,

I am now an administrator and would like to thank you for your support on my RfA. I was very surprised at the number of votes and amount of and kind comments that I gathered. Please don't hesitate to contact me if I mess up in the use of my new powers. --GraemeL (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Stadlen

Actually, it wasn't the 1996 death year that was in error, it was that he helped Mozart. He was a 20th century musicologist who specialized in Mozart. Caerwine 19:42, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Wow, that was a long time ago, had forgotten about it :) Thanks for the correction though. «»Who?¿?meta 20:17, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Arin tab

Thank you very much for working on it! By the way, you may want to look at Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts, which has all sorts of nifty things related to monobook. Titoxd(?!?) 03:15, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Yay! It's nice that you now have a new place. :) As for the ARIN tab, no, I haven't worked on it, but thanks again for working on it. My Monobook is a mess, since it is a cut-and-paste of several users' monobook.js's... I imagine that's what happens when I do that. ;) Titoxd(?!?) 01:12, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User Page

Thanks for reverting my page. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. - Akamad 08:48, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] its ok...

...I'm already doing it! thanks Martin 18:03, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Arbitration

Hi. I cited one of your edits as evidence in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pigsonthewing/Evidence and wanted to be up front about 'accusing' you of repeating a false claim about another user. I think this was an understandable mistake and do not fault you (indeed, I don't even know you), but I thought the point needed to be made to show why the user might be untrusting of admins. Sorry. --CBD T C @ 01:18, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cheers

Thanks for your support on my RfA. Once I get my head round it all I'll have a crack at helping out on CfD. Your comments were also very warmly appreciated, and I hope I fulfill them. Hiding talk 10:06, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blocking template

Thanks, but I can't take credit for this template; it's Jossifresco's Template:Test5-n. I use it for short blocks. For anything over 12 hours I use Template:vblock, which was nice and compact when I created it, but has since grown to a monster... Feel free to improve it! Owen× ☎ 04:09, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sean Black RfA

Thank you very much for your support of my RfA. Thanks, in part, to you, I am now an Administrator, and I pledge to use my newfound powers for good rather than evil. Thanks again!--Sean|Black 06:59, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User:207.200.116.135

I noticed a user recreated this page with the same content after you deleted it. I added a speedy deletion notice, but it was removed. I thought you might want to delete it again. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 16:35, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, I see it's been deleted again now. Cheers. «»Who?¿?meta 18:19, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Camp Lazlo

Blimey, give me a chance! ;) I was listing the AfD as you were writing - a process that takes a few minutes. My explaination about it is on the AfD itself. The issue is not with Camp Lazlo per se, but with the chronic fancruft and listcruft the article appears to be generating. Please feel free to comment on the AfD page, which you should now find to be working. Cheers. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 01:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] RE: blantant vandal tags

Yes - I agree. In some cases, adding the {{bv}} may have been a bit harsh. I do also use the {{test}} templates and will attempt to be more fair with the user talk page warnings in the future. I guess I just got a little upset from a long day today and went directly to the {{bv}} template since I had multiple tabs with talk pages open and was doing a copy and paste assembly line like warning method. I think in most cases, with a few exceptions, my choices in warning templates have been appropriate. Sorry! --Randy 01:59, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Congrats

On your new place! Hope everything works out with it. --Kbdank71 17:01, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] my page

i prefer my page redirect to Best Buy page on wiki, thanks BestBuy25 08:06, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] New Template

Hello Who, Im Moe Epsilon. Im giving you the template for your user page called Template:User Member. It's a user box that says your a member of the AWWDMBJ.... Hope you like it! — Moe ε 03:28, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] cleaned up tag

is it okay to put a cleaned up tag into an article? there's a Romeo + Juliet article that filled with personal POV, and I just tag it. am i allowed to do that or just the administrator? thanks. HoneyBee 23:13, 1 December 2005 (UTC) Thanks for the advise. Just be bold, right? Btw, someone add my comment in your message - something about Daniel? What is going on? HoneyBee 22:30, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fotofab

I spotted Transwiki:Fotofab during Newpages patrol and moved it straight to Fotofab (with a move summary of "WTF?"). It was only while checking the results of the move that I saw the link from Wikipedia:Transwiki log/Articles moved to here and found out what this "Transwiki:" pseudo-namespace was for. I don't think there was actually any harm done this time, but I'll try to be more careful in the future. Sorry. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User 82.3.49.1

I incorrectly made this post to a non-admin. I believe this should go to your attention. RadioKirk 17:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

I blocked them for 24 hours and added {{sharedip}} to their page. Although all the edits are vandalism, it is a sharedip, and there are only a few warnings on the page. Lets see how it goes being temp blocked, maybe that will curb their enthusiasm. Cheers. «»Who?¿?meta 20:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Thank you, and cheers back :) RadioKirk 05:04, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] weird

something weird happened in the Red Eye movie article. the pic is very large and i can't change it, and when i checked the history, there aren't any changes made, except some minor changes from myself. what's going on? HoneyBee 22:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

I happened to notice this question. This edit to the Infobox Movie template apparently changed what needs to be passed in for the image (should now just be "image = Red_Eye_poster.JPG"). I've looked around a bit, and it seems at least most other movies already supply the image in this form. I'll update the Red Eye article. -- Rick Block (talk) 01:52, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the response Rick. Been a little buzy, hadn't had much chance to get on. Cheers. «»Who?¿?meta 17:41, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Yeah - I noticed you've been a little scarce lately (no problem - I've been trying to keep up with CFD speedies). BTW - this template deal is a bigger problem than I thought. I've been through maybe 200 all of the first 500 references to the {{Infobox movie}} template and have found maybe 15 problem references. I don't know how many references there are altogether (thousands?), but it seems like it's going to take a long time to check them all. Fixing them sometimes involves adding a "image caption" parameter to the template as well. I thought about whipping up a script to fetch all the "what links here" and scan for problem articles, but I'm not sure it's actually worthwhile. If you have any thoughts on this please let me know. -- Rick Block (talk) 04:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
OK. I broke down and wrote a little script to fetch all the movie articles. I'm going through them looking for template problems. Should be done in not too long. -- Rick Block (talk) 05:30, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Hey, sorry i didnt have a chance to look yet. Hopefully will be able to get bk online soon. If you can't get it fixed, I will try to get on this weekend and take a look at it. Cheers. «»Who?¿?meta 20:12, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User:Xtremeruna21 AKA User:Elanaretaina

This person apparently has been warned before about changing Wiki pages to her design "standards". A block may be in order. RadioKirk 02:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Changing category names has caused problems for interwiki

Hi, back in October, Whobot changed the names of a number of categories from "Airports of Country" to "Airports in Country". This has caused a problem where categories in wikipedias in other languages had interwikilinks to the categories that were changed. Namely, the links no longer work. I have fixed a couple (Airports in Sweeden and Aiprorts in Poland) but this obviously leaves a great many links in other language wikipedias that have broken links. Is there any way that your bot could possibly go through them and fix the broken links? (I'm guessing not since you would probably need permission from the other wikipedias to run your bot there...? Thought it was worth asking) -- Adz 11:52, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] general question on promo photos

I ask this in place of an unnecessarily detailed question I had up previously. In general when a contributor finds a photo of a band somewhere online, and the bottom of the photo shows the record label's name, so that it appears to be a promotional photo, do we need to hunt down any permissions for uploading it? I have always done that before, but someone else did not do that in an article I help edit.

A person whose talk page you've spoken on before seems to have found a promo photo on a webpage they listed (which no longer exists on the web but once did) in the photo tag. If a photo plainly displays the record company's name is that enough to determine it to be a promophoto or is there more involved, such as seeking permission from the source record company, photographer or group? It almost seems silly to ask someone if you can have permission to have a promophoto photo up as fair use because "promotional" seems to mean it's intended to be used by media, but anyway I've always thought I needed permission before. I will go try to get that from the source label and add it to the photo tag, if I obtain it, I guess. I won't be asking the band or its management because they were too confused by a query a year or so ago, and the label is simpler to talk to in this case. Emerman 14:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Semi-protection

Who: you're an editor whom I respect and admire, and I was wondering your opinion about a proposal that's being considered. At Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy, a couple users and myself are attempting to gather consensus about a possible change in editing. So as not to keep the community out of the loop, we've been posting to user talk pages, which seems to have worked. If you can add your thoughts to the talk page, it would be greatly appreciated. We've gone over a few issues, ranging from perception of anti-wiki to time limits, and recycling pagemove code, so you might want to check out #Rehashing to get up to speed. Thanks in advance, Mysekurity(have you seen this?) 22:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] ehh misc

[edit] Break

Hope everything is ok? Enjoy your wikibreak! --Kbdank71 16:06, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Eh.. yea and no.. my mind just ain't right after the move, lot of stuff i need to do, been out of the loop lately so trying to get better associated with my new surroundings.. Thanks. «»Who?¿?meta 11:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm really sorry to hear that. If you want to talk about anything, you know how to get ahold of me. I'll be on vacation in Arkansas for the next week, but I get back on the 26th. --Kbdank71 19:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:ALMP_pub.jpg

When you return, could you delete all reversions made to this file? We still get the occasional nine-year-old who thinks the pimply faced boy in place of Lindsay Lohan is somehow funny... RadioKirk 17:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

done. «»Who?¿?meta 11:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Semi-protection

hi, thanks for the note, and sorry for the delayed response. I am taking a Wikibreak for awhile, I want to be a part of this, but other things have to be done here. Cheers. «»Who?¿?meta 08:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Sure. I hope your Wikibreak goes well, and you come back relaxed and ready :). I'm in complete agreement that this is, nor should be, anywhere close to the top of your importance list, but I just wanted to let you know. Again, enjoy it, and I'll talk to you soon. -Mysekurity(have you seen this?) 00:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks. «»Who?¿?meta 11:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Merry Christmas

I'm not expecting to be online as much over the next few days so...

User:Francs2000/Christmas

-- Francs2000 09:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] article?

is this an article of a famous person http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenan_Tarabishy ? HoneyBee 14:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Who, I do not believe that I ever said thank-you for putting the Welcome banner on my home page. It has been a great help. Regard, Steven McCrary 18:16, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Change for Wikipedians from Florida

The list Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Florida has been replaced by Category:Wikipedians in Florida. Your name has been removed from the list. If you would like to remain listed as a Wikipedian from Florida, please add [[Category:Wikipedians in Florida]] to your User page. thanks!

KillerChihuahua?!? 12:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC), a member of WikiProject Florida

[edit] draft cfd cleanup proposal

Hi - I wrote a draft proposal for an automated cfd cleanup process, see Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/cleanup. Before making this too public I'm inviting comments from a few selected stakeholders. Please comment if you get a chance. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:10, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] source

hi, happy new year! i hope you have a nice break. by the way, i found this article which has no source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_bali_project , should we take it as an article or it is up for deletion? thx. HoneyBee 21:51, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] HNY

Happy New Year and may all your dreams come true

Link9er 14:20, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] added to missing wikipedians

Hi - Just thought I'd let you know somebody added you to missing wikipedians so when you return you should remove yourself from this list. I expect you're not actually gone, but don't really know. If you are, I assume you've found something else of interest in your life and wish you the best. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Nope not gone gone, just taking a mental break.. i think i will be back soon.. thanks. «»Who?¿?meta 02:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcomed

Hey, last time I looked here you were gone, so put off leaveing a message. Anyways, I used you're welcome to me to welocme some newbs on my own. I did go and change a few things, but failed to remove {{User:Who/Welcomed}}. So, you may have a few welcomed users on your list that you didn't welcome. Thnx for lettin me use it tho, did up a new one when I found out.  :) THNX Joe I 02:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Karen Dotrice

Hey, when you're back and able, I have a request: With a great deal of input, my first article from scratch is up for Featured Article status (self-nominated). Feel free to visit and vote! RadioKirk talk to me 18:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Native American Wikipedians

You should look here Template:User_Native_American

So far the only person using it is a Euro-American. Maybe his great-great-great grandfather was one, but ...

Harvestdancer 00:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Katar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Katar.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 15:45, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Please see: Image talk:Katar.jpg --Cool CatTalk|@ 21:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User 82.3.49.1

Your 24-hour block of 82.3.49.1 has expired and he is back to vandalizing pages. --Descendall 12:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Deletion_review#List of interesting_or_unusual place_names

Hi. You might be interested in a/m undeletion. -- User:Docu


The page was relisted on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of interesting or unusual place names (2nd nomination). -- User:Docu

[edit] About Kiev

I have some problem when I edit Kiev. I want to add Beijing as one of Kiev's sister cities (Twin cities) in the table but I do not know how to add it. Also, I do not know to find who to help me. So, I randomly find an Administrator to help me. Please help me! If you want to know more about the sister cities of Beijing, you can go to Beijing and then go to the part of City and regional partnerships.Thank you!

[edit] Who?

You the Doctor? THE DOCTOR? --Cool CatTalk|@ 21:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Who/Test

I just deleted User talk:Who/Test since it doesn't seem to be linked from anywhere and it seems unnecessary. Feel free to recreate it if you need it though. -- WB 22:50, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] you still around?

Hey - I've been real world distracted for a while, and looks like you have been as well. Are you still around? Seems like you don't have an email address set up. Please post something, if for no other reason than just to let folks know you're OK. -- Rick Block (talk) 05:09, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] making new articles/pages

I'd like to ask you, how do I make separate/new pages for a particular article? I've notice that Highlander movies article is very large and not handled very well. How do I help to separate this article like the ones with Star Trek, Star Wars, etc? Maybe as a moderator, you can help? Thanks. HoneyBee 03:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Jesse_mccartney.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jesse_mccartney.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 16:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar, OTR & PUA Review

FYI. You may want to look and comment here: Wikipedia:Barnstar and award proposals/Proposed Changes. For your reference, the guidelines are referenced here: Barnstar Proposal Guidelines. Thanks -- evrik 18:40, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Whobot/Pearlebot log in status clue shortage

Hi, I have a need to do some readonly access (not updating pages, at least not yet) to WP from within a perlscript I'm working on and thought using pearlebot/whobot might be a good starting point for the access and parsing utilities. I took a copy of whobot and am trying to call the utility routine getPage ... it has a check to see if the user is logged in or not. I changed it to my ID but since I'm running from the command line in a dosbox, I think I am not. This despite taking a copy of the fake cookie file and trying to change it around. I didn't quite follow how bots are logged in... is there a trick to being logged in? Thanks for any suggestions where to read! ++Lar: t/c 19:42, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Who has not apparently logged in since January 20. It looks like you're conversing with Beland about this, which is what I'd suggest in Who's absence. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:55, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Indeed... I got quite a bit farther than this question (but still have more...) so it's no biggie that Who didn't answer. Thanks. ++Lar: t/c 23:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wonder what the policy is

Hey Joe Gotta Question. I was bopping around Wikipedia and visited one of the pages I previous helped out on. It is now up for deletion which really surprised me because the reason stated was that there were no citations for sources on the facts. But, there were more citations than I've seen on most pages. So I went to the discussion about the proposed deletion and it was pretty insane. One person called it a witch hunt. Seems one person has a big issue with the page and is going about trash talking and campaigning, misrepresenting facts, and all that nice stuff. What happens when a bully does that kind of thing? The guy seems whole bent on driving this page out of existence, which I'm neither here nor there about. It just seems wrong that its not for policy. Since Wikipedia isn't about policing, does that also mean that there are no rules for those who don't honor the honor system? 'this article's entry Brotherstork 03:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] He is Risen

Jesus Christ is risen today, Alleluia!
our triumphant holy day, Alleluia!
who did once upon the cross, Alleluia!
suffer to redeem our loss. Alleluia!

Hymns of praise then let us sing, Alleluia!
unto Christ, our heavenly King, Alleluia!
who endured the cross and grave, Alleluia!
sinners to redeem and save. Alleluia!

But the pains which he endured, Alleluia!
our salvation have procured, Alleluia!
now above the sky he's King, Alleluia!

where the angels ever sing. Alleluia!

-- Psy guy Talk 06:00, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Buddha Purnima

Hello, kindly accept my greetings on the occasion of Buddha Purnima. --Bhadani 16:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use image

Hi there, please remove the fair use image from User:Who/Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen as per fair use policy - fair use images aren't allowed in user namespace. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Seeing as you appear to be away, I have removed it. I hope you don't mind. Stifle (talk) 00:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Off to see the wizard...

Don't know if you're going to get this, but let me say if you don't return, as your message above hints, it was an extreme pleasure working with you. Take care on your journey through life. You'll be missed. --Kbdank71 13:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CFD renomination

For info: a cat you previously voted to delete has been recreated. Please see:

--Mais oui! 17:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ryan Bollman

I wasn't the one who left the speedy tag; I left the hangon and followed up with a talk page message.

Your comment would better have been directed to User:Calton, who had speedied it in the first place. Daniel Case 13:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Back?

Hi - I see you're doing some editing. Does this mean you're back? I added the "he's not likely to respond" banner that shows up at the bottom of this page (source is at the top of the page). If you're just "testing the water" and want to leave it for a while, that's OK with me. If you are back, you might want to delete it (and you may want to visit Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians). I really don't want to pressure you, but you've been sorely missed and if you are back it will make me VERY happy. -- Rick Block (talk) 15:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Ditto. --Kbdank71 15:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Yea. I've been a bit restless and doing some playing around whilest getting ready to go on trip. Leave Tues. I think I will prolly come back when we get back, but slowly. Give me something to do. Just been really buzy around here, too much stuff to do plus wiki. Thanks for noticing and the msgs. I was seriously thinking they were complaints from my edits :) Good thing it was ya'll. Till Then. «»Who?¿?meta 04:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Gabriel damon pd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gabriel damon pd.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shannernanner 13:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rose byrne.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rose byrne.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok ☠ 02:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:F_murray_abraham_pd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:F_murray_abraham_pd.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More replaceable fair-use images

  • Image:Todd bridges.jpg
  • Image:David gallagher 2001 02.jpg
  • Image:Donald duke nigeria.jpg

—Chowbok ☠ 05:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)