User talk:Whitepaw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Whitepaw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Contents 1 Therianthropy 2 hello 3 Boiserie 4 1 more user box 5 Metal Prices 6 Myra Wilson 7 List of Space: 1999 epsiodes 8 Wiktionary links 9 A Clue: No - plot 10 Age category 11 WikiProject Furry

[edit] Therianthropy

If you're interested, Therianthropy has recently developed some controversy. [1] ‣ᓛᖁᑐ 07:10, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure if I should be replying here, on or your talk page... but either way; thanks for the greeting. - Whitepaw 21:53:33 17th Jan 2005 UTC

[edit] hello

Hello. Please note that "See also" and "External links" should not have capital initial letters after the first word; see Wikipedia:Manual of Style on section headings. Michael Hardy 01:31, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, I missed that one. Whitepaw 09:10, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)

[edit] Boiserie

Hi, Regarding your edit today at Boiserie do you really think it is an architectural stub? To my way of thinking its more carpentry, interior design or something like that. Giano | talk 21:22, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

Hello Giano,

I used arch-stub because that was the best fit I could see, but I'm hardly an expert. I agree 'interior design' seems a better stub-type, but I didn't see that stub-type (nor carpentry) in the lists at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types and Wikipedia:Template messages/Stubs. Do you know of any more comprehensive lists? I'm sure I've seen some stub-types used that aren't on either...

Whitepaw 21:32, 2005 May 4 (UTC)

Well, I've changed the category, but I still don't know of any better stub-types

Whitepaw 12:22, 2005 May 6 (UTC)

[edit] 1 more user box

I think that there is one userbox that you should probbibly add to your page:

True, isn't it?--Akako|☎ 19:36, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

*nods* yes, yes it is... What can I say -- I was feeling bored that day. :O) Whitepaw 08:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Metal Prices

In the Samarium-cobalt magnet article, you mention Cobalt's price sensitivity. Where can I find out more about the price sensitivity of metals? --DryaUnda 17:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm afraid I can't remember. It's been over a year since I wrote that... Whitepaw 19:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Myra Wilson

I stumbled upon this stub entirely accidentally; however, I cannot see how this person is notable enough to merit their own article. The claim seems to rest upon her anecdotal television appearances. Based upon the guidelines for notability, this does not appear to be enough. Is there anything to add to make this a credible entry? Mk3severo 01:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of Space: 1999 epsiodes

Thanks for the help, and no, I didn't forget about it :) — Moe 19:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, if you know anyone or you would like to help write the short summaries on this page, please feel free to help out in doing so. :) — Moe 20:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wiktionary links

Just so you know, {{wiktionarypar}} is better than {{wiktionary}}, as the former lets you link to exactly the right article, whereas the latter links to Wiktionary's "Search" feature. (The distinction exists for historical reasons, and {{wiktionary}} still exists for backward compatibility with articles that still use it, but it should never be added to articles, as {{wiktionarypar}} is always better.) For example, I altered your recent edit to Supine to use {{wiktionarypar|supine}}. —Ruakh_TALK 20:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the info! --Whitepaw 21:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A Clue: No - plot

I see you had a hand in this section. Could your give a hand boiling it down as per request on its page? Thanks. Neddyseagoon - talk 19:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Age category

Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:

• Using an age group category, such as Category:Wikipedians in their 30s
• Using a decade category, such as Category:Wikipedians born in the 1970s.

If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 13:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Furry