User talk:Whiskey Pete

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Lucky 6.9 01:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Summaries & dates

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Also, note that dates should be wikified in order to allow users' preferences to work. Thus:

etc. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] category has been deleted.

Hi, Whiskey Pete. This is just a note to let you know that Category:Supermodels has now been deleted and WP:SALTed, so please don't add it to articles anymore. Thanks! — coelacan talk — 06:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD Nomination: P. S. Prasad (disambig)

An editor has nominated the article P. S. Prasad (disambig) for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. S. Prasad (disambig). Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article P. S. Prasad (disambig) during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 15:07, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Liberating Mayo A. Shattuck III

Hey there. You left a message on my talk page earlier today, and I was wondering, was this in error, or are you asking me to personally remove the copyright infringement tag? I've had no participation in the article you mention, hence my question. If you could clarify, that would be great. -DarkElf109 08:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

But isn't it still a copyvio? I don't think anyone has touched the page since I flagged it. I seem to be the last editor. Quatloo 22:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Check out Talk:Mayo_A._Shattuck_III/Temp, the temporary subpage created for editing it out. Pete's fixed it up nicely (check the edit log). Since I didn't put up the warning, I'm not gonna remove it, but if you feel his work is enough to get it removed, notify an administrator to get the temporary page moved over the copyvio'd page. -DarkElf109 22:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I have no objection to someone embarking upon this process. I haven't had any contact with administrators and know very little about wikipedia bureaucracy, so I'm probably not the person to do this. Quatloo 07:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Quatloo, didn't you add the copyvio? Anyway, if no one with admin privleges swoops down within a week or so, I'll just try deleting the tag (or stalking someone down who can) myself. -- Whiskey Pete, 20:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PMR

Do you really not get why we're redirecting the article? └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 21:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

I "get" the case for redirecting, thank you; I just don't get why some people are so adamant about it. Whiskey Pete 22:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I think that would be because two articles on the same subject is obviously of no use in an encyclopedia, and in fact invites non-conforming use of the "breakaway" article (that is, more bias and non-reliable information creeping into the PMR article as most contributors are paying attention to--and in fact only know of--the Transnistria article). └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 14:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
really, man, it's all good, I see your point totally. I was just a bit surprised by the sense of engagement people had about this issue, that's all. (FWIW, the sole reason I re-created the PMR artcile was because the Category of Unrecognized states refers generally to proper state names, not colloquialy names -- that's all. So a proper redirect would resolve this ambiguity just fine.) Whiskey Pete 00:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Brandt/namebase.org

The edit didn't identify what "WMF's Spam blocklist" was, or why that was noteworthy. —tregoweth (talk) 01:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Comments on Imam Rapito

funny your googling... on the advantages of the international press. it goes on both way though, as you can see if you check here... But your comment sparked my interest, and it is true that already in February 2006, a year ago, you could find reference (albeit with a spelling mistake, that confused me first) in Le Figaro (very good newspaper for international things), see here if you're interested... ciao ragazzo! Tazmaniacs

if you find a Google translator or something, the last paragraphs of this article by an Italian journalist are most interesting (you may even understand even if you don't a get word of this language). It would be interesting to find more on this subject in the press (see here). Tazmaniacs
hey there; thanks for your work on that page. actually, I can sort of understand articles in French, but I confess I that the intricacies of Italian politics are much more mysterious to me, so I don't quite understand the significance. nonetheless, please keep adding references; the U.S. press, as usual, is treating the story quite superficially, in general, and most of the interesting stuff (to say nothing of actual names of American servicepersonnel involved) comes from the foreign press. Whiskey Pete 02:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks to Whiskey Pete

Thank you very much for your valuable contributions and comments.S710 20:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Death flights

The Death flights doesn't mention Vietnam. Maybe you should add it there? Badagnani 03:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

How we meet again! Hey, I just passed over Rocco Martino, and there is some talk about "double agent" - with whom? he was employed by SISMI, allegedly to spy on the French? So who is the second agency? States? By the way, concerning horror flights, do you know anything about Leonardo A. Cole, Clouds of Secrecy ? Ah, well, I've found something here on Wiki, see Serratia marcescens. There should be a special entry for this... Enjoy J&B ! Tazmaniacs
PS: concerning death flights per se, there is a lot to see with Paul Aussaresses who taught the US some "technics" learnt during the Battle of Algiers. They most probably found their inspiration there for Vietnam... Tazmaniacs
One other thing, only a coincidence, but Spataro, in charge of the Imam's case, was also in charge of the trial of Adriano Sofri... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tazmaniacs (talk • contribs) 05:41, 15 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] oppose

Hi, If you really meant to vote"oppose" in the poll Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll, you put your vote in the wrong column! Mention this to anyone else whose vote looks displaced. linas 05:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pirate Capital LLC

[edit] Pirate Capital LLC

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Pirate Capital LLC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mmoneypenny 07:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Cord Meyer, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 00:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Public Information Research

I've left a note on the talk:Public Information Research in case you'd like to discuss your edits to that article. Please don't revert again without discussion. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Lee Van Arsdale

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lee Van Arsdale, by Gilliam (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lee Van Arsdale seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lee Van Arsdale, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Lee Van Arsdale itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Angolagate

The article you started on Angolagate is clearly stolen from this[1] Corpwatch article. I'm assuming this was an accident. Perspicacite 01:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Could be – can't say I recall steeling from that Corpwatch article, but at this point I'm not even sure I started the article (or if I did, perhaps I copied it blindly from somewhere else in WP, which in turn stole from the CW article.) Anyway, feel free to munge into something less plagiaristic Whiskey Pete (talk) 18:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi!

Did you see that? Interesting... Is that just a name change, or is the new gov' really trying to take back control on these guys? You might also want to keep an eye on this guy, not alone in this kind of job... Cheers! Tazmaniacs 12:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Cabinda-shield-medium.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Cabinda-shield-medium.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:178b golden chain2050081722-9985.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:178b golden chain2050081722-9985.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 9 December 2007 (UTC)