Template talk:White supremacist organizations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Name
What benefit does this template offer that Category:White supremacy doesn't already have? It appears to be a billboard. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 08:10, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- It does? I tried to get these articles off the list at White supremacy and put them into a smaller area, because it looked bad there. I think it looks somewhat better as a template. Prehaps a more neutral color would be less billboard-like.--SefringleTalk 08:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Since the groups don't self-identify as "white supremacist", it's a bit touchy to create a list and put it on a couple dozen pages. It associates groups whose member may object to being on a list together. While a category listing may do so as well, it's less prominent since the reader must follow a link to see the list. There's a template format that collapses the box until the reader opens it. Perhaps that would make this template less objectionable. But I still think it doesn't add anything to the category we already had. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 04:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- I was hoping to collapse the template. I am just not completely sure how to do that.--SefringleTalk 21:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not very familair, but I think you need to link to the template using {{White supremist organizations|state=collapsed}}. There's more info at Wikipedia:NavFrame. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 22:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- tried that, but it didn't work.--SefringleTalk 04:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not very familair, but I think you need to link to the template using {{White supremist organizations|state=collapsed}}. There's more info at Wikipedia:NavFrame. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 22:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- I was hoping to collapse the template. I am just not completely sure how to do that.--SefringleTalk 21:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Since the groups don't self-identify as "white supremacist", it's a bit touchy to create a list and put it on a couple dozen pages. It associates groups whose member may object to being on a list together. While a category listing may do so as well, it's less prominent since the reader must follow a link to see the list. There's a template format that collapses the box until the reader opens it. Perhaps that would make this template less objectionable. But I still think it doesn't add anything to the category we already had. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 04:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vígríðr?
Is there a source for this? There's nothing about such an organization on the Vígríðr article. Cmprince 14:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
