Wheel speed sensor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wheel speed sensors are sender devices used for reading the speed of the vehicle's wheel rotation. It usually consists of a toothed ring and pickup.

Contents

[edit] Special purpose speed sensors

[edit] Rotary speed sensors for rail vehicles

Many of the subsystems in a rail vehicle depend on a reliable and precise rotary speed signal, in some cases as a measure of the speed or changes in the speed. This applies in particular to traction control, but also to wheel slide protection, registration, train control, door control and so on. These tasks are performed by a number of rotary speed sensors that may be found in various parts of the vehicle.

In the past, sensors for this purpose often failed to function satisfactorily or were not reliable enough and gave rise to vehicle faults. This was particularly the case for the early mainly analogue sensors, but digital models were also affected.

This was mainly due to the extremely harsh operating conditions encountered in rail vehicles. The relevant standards specify detailed test criteria, but in

[edit] Rotary speed sensors for motors

[edit] Bearingless motor speed sensors

Although rail vehicles occasionally do use drives without sensors, most need a rotary speed sensor for their regulator system. The most common type is a two-channel sensor that scans a toothed wheel on the motor shaft or gearbox and therefore does not require a bearing of its own.

The target wheel can be provided especially for this purpose or may be already present in the drive system. Modern sensors of this type make use of the principle of magnetic field modulation and are suitable for ferromagnetic target wheels with a module between m =1 and m = 3.5 (D.P.=25 to D.P.=7). The form of the teeth is of secondary importance; target wheels with involute or rectangular toothing can be scanned. Depending on the diameter and teeth of the wheel it is possible to get between 60 and 300 pulses per revolution, which is sufficient for drives of lower and medium traction performance.

This type of sensor normally consists of two hall effect sensors, a rare earth magnet and appropriate evaluation electronics. The field of the magnet is modulated by the passing target teeth. This modulation is registered by the Hall sensors, converted by a comparator stage to a square wave signal and amplified in a driver stage.

Unfortunately, the Hall effect varies greatly with temperature. The sensors’ sensitivity and also the signal offset therefore depend not only on the air gap but also on the temperature. This also very much reduces the maximum permissible air gap between the sensor and the target wheel. At room temperature an air gap of 2 to 3 mm can be tolerated without difficulty for a typical target wheel of module m = 2, but in the required temperature range of from 40°C to 120°C the maximum gap for effective signal registration drops to 1.3 mm. Smaller pitch target wheels with module m = 1 are often used to get a higher time resolution or to make the construction more compact. In this case the maximum possible air gap is only 0.5 to 0.8 mm.

For the design engineer, the visible air gap that the sensor ends up with is primarily the result of the specific machine design, but is subject to whatever constraints are needed to register the rotary speed. If this means that the possible air gap has to lie within a very small range, then this will also restrict the mechanical tolerances of the motor housing and target wheels to prevent signal dropouts during operation. This means that in practice there may be problems, particularly with smaller pitched target wheels of module m = 1 and disadvantageous combinations of tolerances and extreme temperatures. From the point of view of the motor manufacturer, and even more so the operator, it is therefore better to look for speed sensors with a wider range of air gap.

The primary signal from a Hall sensor loses amplitude sharply as the air gap increases. For sensor manufacturers this means that they need to provide maximum possible compensation for the Hall signal’s physically induced offset drift. The conventional way of doing this is to measure the temperature at the sensor and use this information to compensate the offset, but this fails for two reasons: firstly because the drift does not vary linearly with the temperature, and secondly because not even the sign of the drift is the same for all sensors.

For a new sensor generation it was therefore necessary to find another way: an integrated signal processor now corrects the offset and amplitude of the Hall sensor signals. This correction is so effective that one can almost double the maximum permissible air gap at the speed sensor. On a module m = 1 target wheel these new sensors can tolerate an air gap of 1.4 mm, which is wider than that for conventional speed sensors on module m = 2 target wheels. On a module m = 2 target wheel the new speed sensors can tolerate gap of as much as 2.2 mm. It has also been possible to markedly increase the signal quality. Both the duty cycle and the phase displacement between the two channels is at least three times as stable in the face of fluctuating air gap and temperature drift.

In addition, in spite of the complex electronics it has also been possible to increase the MTBF for the new speed sensors by a factor of three to four. So they not only provide more precise signals, their signal availability is also significantly better.

These new sensors, still with the familiar appearance, thus open up whole new possibilities for the designers of drives for rolling stock. The sensors are attractively priced and operate without wear and tear.

[edit] Motor encoders with integrated bearings

There is a limit on the number of pulses achievable by sensors without integrated bearings: with a 300 mm diameter target wheel it is normally not possible to get beyond 300 pulses per revolution. But many locomotives and electric multiple units (EMUs) need higher numbers of pulses for proper operation of the traction converter, for instance when there are tight constraints on the traction regulator at low speeds. Such applications really need encoders with built-in bearings, which can tolerate an air gap many orders of magnitude smaller because of the greatly reduced play on the actual sensor as opposed to that of the motor bearing. This makes it possible to choose a much smaller pitch for the measuring scale, right down to module m = 0.22. There are a number of types of encoder with this property. One of them is used in large numbers in EMUs. It can be used to achieve values from less than 100 to more than 130 000 pulses per revolution. In railway applications however, the maximum possible pulses per revolution are not required.

For even greater robustness and signal accuracy a precision encoder can be used.

The functional principles of the two encoders are similar: a multichannel magneto-resistive sensor scans a target wheel with 256 teeth, generating sine and cosine signals. Arctangent interpolation is used to generate up to 512 rectangular pulses from each of the 256 signal periods per revolution. The precision encoder also possesses amplitude and offset correction functions that are housed in the external interpolation unit. This makes it possible to further improve the signal quality, which has a very positive effect on the traction regulator.

[edit] Speed sensors on the wheelset

[edit] Bearingless wheelset speed sensors

Bearingless speed sensors may be found in almost every wheelset of a rail vehicle. They are principally used for wheel slide protection and usually supplied by the manufacturer of the wheel slide protection system. These sensors require a sufficiently small air gap and need to be particularly reliable. One special feature of rotary speed sensors that are used for wheel slide protection is their integrated monitoring functions. Two-wire sensors with a current output of 7 mA/14 mA are used to detect broken cables. Other designs provide for an output voltage of around 7 V as soon as the signal frequency drops below 1 Hz. Another method used is to detect a 50 MHz output signal from the sensor when the power supply is periodically modulated at 50 MHz. It is also common for two-channel sensors to have electrically isolated channels.

Occasionally it is necessary to take off the wheel slide protection signal at the traction motor, and the output frequency is then often too high for the wheel slide protection electronics. For this application there is a speed sensor with an integrated frequency divider. There are now products available that are compliant with all the usual standards, with considerably improved technical properties and markedly longer useful lives.

[edit] Wheelset pulse generator with integrated bearing

A rail vehicle, particularly a locomotive, generally possesses numerous subsystems that require a separate electrically separated speed signal. There usually is neither enough mounting places nor is there sufficient space where separate pulse generators could be installed.

For many years there have therefore been multichannel pulse generators that are flange-mounted onto the bearing shells or covers of wheelsets. These have the advantage over bearingless models that they can generate markedly higher pulse numbers. Using a number of bearingless speed sensors would also involve additional cables, which should preferably be avoided for outdoor equipment because they are so susceptible to damage, for instance from flying ballast.

All the manufacturers previously active in this market used mainly optical sensors.

From one to four channels can be implemented, each channel having a photosensor that scans one of at most two signal tracks on a slotted disk. Experience shows that the possible number of channels achievable by this technique is still not enough. A number of subsystems therefore have to make do with looped-through signals from the wheel slide protection electronics and are therefore forced to accept, for instance, the available number of pulses, although a separate speed signal might well have some advantages.

The use of optical sensors has been familiar for many years and is widespread in industry. Unfortunately they do have two fundamental weaknesses that have always made it very difficult to get them to function reliably over a number of years, namely - the optical components are extremely susceptible to dirt, and - the light source ages too quickly.

Even traces of dirt greatly reduce the amount of light that passes through the lens and can cause signal dropout. These encoders are therefore required to be very well sealed. Even sealing the encoder bearing to prevent it emitting grease is a problem that even the ingenuity of designers has been unable to fully resolve. Further problems are encountered when the pulse generators are used in environments in which the dew point is passed: the lenses fog and the signal is frequently interrupted.

The light sources used are light-emitting diodes (LEDs). But LEDs are always subject to ageing, which over a few years leads to a noticeably reduced beam. Attempts are made to compensate for this by using special regulators that gradually increase the current through the LED, but unfortunately this further accelerates the ageing process.

The principle used in scanning a ferromagnetic measuring scale magnetically does not exhibit these deficiencies. During many years’ experience of using magnetic encoders there have been occasions when a seal has failed and a pulse generator has been found to be completely covered in a thick layer of brake dust and other dirt, but such pulse generators still functioned perfectly.

Magnetic scanning systems were previously simply too expensive to use, but recently a multichannel pulse generator became available that is not only fundamentally superior to previous pulse generators in its robustness and resistant to dirt, but also sets a new standard for flexibility. Here, for comparison, are a few of its key features:

- from one to eight channels, instead of the previous one to four - up to three different pulse values per revolution from a single encoder, instead of the previous two - from 1 to 400 pulses per revolution, instead of the previously achieved 200 - voltage output, current output, signals with a 7 V idle voltage, instead of only a voltage output as previously

There is now a new variant with a maximised hysteresis of ± 90° relative to a signal period. When installed under unfavourable conditions and exposed to severe vibration this variant suppresses any extraneous pulses while the vehicle is at a standstill.

Altogether, these innovative pulse generators offer new features that also open up entirely new possibilities for system integrators.

It is possibly to supply significantly more subsystems with independent, electrically isolated output signals. And naturally installation compatible pulse generators can be configured for all the usual previously marketed products.

The magnetic measuring principle and optimised bearing technology increases the pulse generators’ reliability, not only increasing maintenance intervals but also significantly reducing maintenance costs.

Pulse generators constructed in accordance with this principle have been successfully field tested by several rail operators since the beginning of 2005. The type test specified in EN 50155 has also been successfully completed, so that these pulse generators can now be delivered.

[edit] Wheelset pulse generators with integrated bearings for inside-journal bogies

Inside-journal bogies make particular demands on the pulse generator designer because they have no bearing cover on the end to serve as the basis from which the rotation of the wheelset shaft could be registered. In this case the pulse generator has to be mounted on a shaft stub attached to the wheelset and fitted with a torque converter connected to the bogie frame to prevent it from rotating.

The extreme vibration in this location leads to a considerable load on the pulse generator bearing, which, with this method of installation has to carry not only the relatively small mass of the pulse generator shaft but that of the entire pulse generator. When we consider that bearing life reduces with at least the third power of the load we can see that a reliable and durable pulse generator for such a situation cannot merely be adapted from the more common standard pulse generator for outside-journal bogies merely by fitting and intermediate flange or similar construction. It really is necessary to have a pulse generator with a modified design adapted to the requirements of such a location.

Previously these pulse generator were available only with considerably restricted technical properties, for instance limited to at most 140 pulses per revolution or a limited number of channels. A new product has now been developed that offers the complete specification for a wheelset pulse generator in a housing that was specially designed for installation in inside-journal bogies.

[edit] Speed sensors for non-magnetic target wheels or applications that produce swarf

Some transport companies are faced with a special problem: the circulating air that keeps the motors cool carries dwarf abraded from the wheels and rails. This collects on the heads of magnetic sensors and can cause malfunctions. Such a “magnetic short circuit” can cause dropouts or complete loss of signal. And there have been cases where encoders have been physically damaged by the abrasive effect of the particles.

There are also increasingly motors in which sensors have to scan aluminium target wheels, for instance because the impellers are made of an aluminium alloy and the manufacturer does not wish to have to shrink on a separate ferromagnetic gear rim.

For these applications there is a speed sensor available that gets by without a magnet. A number of transmitting and receiving coils are used to generate an alternating electric field with a frequency of the order of 1 MHz and the modulation of the coupling between senders and receivers is then evaluated. This sensor is installation and signal compatible to the magnetic sensors; for most common target wheel modules the units can simply be replaced without any other measures being necessary.

Over the last few years these sensor have been able to drastically reduce the failure rates of many transport companies when installed in the critical environments described above.

[edit] Speed sensors with pulse doubling

Customers often want a higher number of pulses per revolution than can be achieved in the space available and with the smallest module m = 1. An industry standard flange-compatible speed sensor has been developed for such applications that generates two pulses for each tooth of the wheel. This makes it possible to achieve 600 pulses per revolution with a target wheel module m = 1 and a diameter of 300 mm. These speed sensors are currently being tested at a major system integrators.

[edit] External links

Template:Rail road