User talk:Whelck
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Ufck
If you don't think the article should belong here, put it on articles for deletion. #2 I'm not going to revert since I don't see any vandalism. #3 whether the person is blocked from your site or not is not of any significance to us. I'd recommend putting it on AfD if you don't feel like it should be here. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 05:39, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- I unprotected it for the moment. Get the afd tag on there and then let me know and I'll reprotect. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 05:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
I will do that - I haven't used the wiki much, so I'm still finding my way around it. I know what has been done on my site is not of much concern for your content, however it does speak volumes about the content of the article if the creator is no longer allowed there.
[edit] ha ha i ruined venskus
lick me chris please do...
[edit] ....
you ruined what?
[edit] Venskus
[edit] okay...
and that is what? It's funny that you mention ufck.org in there, even though I have no clue what you're talking about
- it was that board you said you were the moderator of
-
- do you have trouble following everything, Reid? I don't know what Venskus is. I obviously know about the messageboard that I own (not that I just moderator) Whelck 05:57, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- it would be what you banned me over
-
-
-
-
- actually I banned you for having an alter, which is in violation of the board policy. but nice try. Whelck 05:59, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- uh huh, you banned me before anyone knew i had an alter douche, enjoy the effort that i killed with one little wikipedia article
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Look, Reid. I know you had an alter, that's why I banned you. Your IPs matched in the database, and the e-mails were very similar. Whelck 06:16, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
[edit] Regarding User:Whelck
Replied! —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-11 06:36:13Z
