Talk:Wheelock, North Dakota

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject North Dakota This article is within the scope of WikiProject North Dakota,
a WikiProject which aims to improve all articles related to North Dakota.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low-importance within North Dakota articles.

This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
This article or page is part of WikiProject Ghost towns, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of ghost towns. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the assessment scale.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in North Dakota may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

[edit] Material from book

For the time being, I have removed the text which was copied from a history book. Wikipedia cannot accept any type of material that is not in the public domain or that is not used under the GFDL or a GFDL-compatible license (which means that anybody - not only Wikipedia - could use the text for any purpose they so desired including commercial purposes). Please provide information about any copyrights on this book and who owns those copyrights. It would actually be easier and better to simply rephrase the text from the book and include that version in this article. It would be great to have a historical background section in this article, but it gets very complicated when an editor like yourself wishes to include material from a previously published work...that's why it's best to simply rephrase any text you want to include here. --MatthewUND(talk) 06:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)