Weyl's lemma (Laplace equation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, Weyl's lemma is a result that provides a "very weak" form of the Laplace equation. It is named after the German mathematician Hermann Weyl.

Contents

[edit] Statement of the lemma

Let n \in \mathbb{N} and let Ω be an open subset of \mathbb{R}^{n}. Let Δ denote the usual Laplace operator. Suppose that u is locally integrable (i.e., u \in L_{\mathrm{loc}}^{1} (\Omega; \mathbb{R})) and that

\int_{\Omega} u(x) \Delta \phi (x) \, \mathrm{d} x = 0 \quad (Eq. 1)

for every smooth function \phi : \Omega \to \mathbb{R} with compact support in Ω. Then, possibly after redefinition on a set of measure zero, u is smooth and has Δu = 0 in Ω.

[edit] Proof

Weyl's lemma follows from more general results concerning so-called the regularity property of elliptic operators. For example, one way to see why the lemma holds is to note that elliptic operators do not shrink singular support and that 0 has no singular support.

[edit] "Weak" and "very weak" forms of the Laplace equation

The strong formulation of the Laplace equation is to seek functions u with Δu = 0 in some domain of interest, Ω. The usual weak formulation is to seek weakly-differentiable functions u such that

\int_{\Omega} \nabla u (x) \cdot \nabla \phi (x) \, \mathrm{d} x = 0 \quad (Eq. 2)

for every φ in the Sobolev space W_{0}^{1, 2} (\Omega; \mathbb{R}). A solution of (Eq. 2) will also satisfy (Eq. 1) above, and the converse holds if, in addition, u \in W^{1, 2} (\Omega; \mathbb{R}). Consequently, one can view (Eq. 1) as a "very weak" form of the Laplace equation, and a solution of (Eq. 1) as a "very weak" solution of Δu = 0.

[edit] References

  • Dacorogna, Bernard (2004). Introduction to the Calculus of Variations. London: Imperial College Press. ISBN 1-86094-508-2.