Talk:Wet Set Magazine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Pornography Portal This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portal	Wet Set Magazine is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article was nominated for deletion on July 15, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

|| This is not a deliberate advertizement. A lot of the text about the magazine has been quoted from the magazine's page though. It should probably be changed to have a more encyclopedic tone. Fsecret 15:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC) I have gone in and toned down some of the advertising language quoted from the site. Fsecret 16:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC) I also oppose the deletion of this article. This publication offers insight to how omorashi fits into modern society and an unbiased look into/history of the magazine could be of genuine interest to many people JayKeaton 16:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

The article is in desperate need of links to reliable secondary sources to establish notability. The JPS^{talk to me} 21:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

The alterations made to the page IMHO do turn it into an article rather than an advertisement which it did appear to be when the speedy deletion was flagged, a little further work will turn this into a suitable article as per User:The JPS comments, as the person whom posted the Speedy Deletion flag initially I propose an admin now removes this flag MarkBolton 07:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

An admin is not needed to remove a speedy deletion tag, anyone except the person who started the article can remove it. Just like I did just now JayKeaton 13:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)