Talk:Wet & Wild: Slippery When Wet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
[edit] Heidi Androl
There are strong rumors that Apprentice 6 contestant Heidi Androl appears in this video (it is listed on her IMDB page and she is listed in the cast on the IMDB page for the movie). However, she isn't mentioned in this article, and upon watching the video, I can't seem to pick her out. She did look different when she was younger, as she's much thinner now. Anyone know for sure if she is in this video? 18:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] VfD
On April 14, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep (no consensus). See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Wet & Wild: Slippery When Wet (2000) for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:12, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] nudity
Usually I'd argue pro nude pictures, if they are useful, but it seems to be a tad overblown here (though certainly topic-related). Those contributing are probably best placed to reduce nudity and sexual innuendo somewhat, so asked.
BTW (out of interest), why are you spending your time on writing a lengthy!! article on one porn video? IcycleMort 18:56, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
-
- I feel that during the period from the late 1980's to the early 2000's Playboy made an important contribution to erotic artwork along with others such as Zalman King and Adrian Lyne. So when I first joined Wikipedia I started work on two Playboy related articles at about the same time, Playboy videos and Wet & Wild: Slippery When Wet (which is in my opinion the best example of erotic filming produced by Playboy). It was easier to write the latter article as it was purely descriptive, but unfortunately the length of the article was something I neglected to take into consideration and, inevitably, this was brought up in an earlier discussion. I had to agree that it was longer than it needed to be. So, I decided to spend more time on the main article (which I think is a better contribution but still needs to be completed) and edit the Wet & Wild article to be significanly shorter when that article is completed. I am still working on the main article but I will come back to this one as I am not entirely happy with its current state. Jester2001 10:00, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
