User talk:Westfall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Westfall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  —User:ACupOfCoffee@ 02:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing that for me. Stupid typos. —User:ACupOfCoffee@ 02:23, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for the help with cleanup. Pavel Vozenilek 05:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] One system to classify articles

is on [1]. How much we will actually see and when is big question. Pavel Vozenilek 05:23, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

User:Magnus Manske is one of main MediaWiki (software used for Wikipedia) developers (see Wikipedia:Magnus Manske Day). Be aware that MediaWiki is project made on shoestring and most of its developers are not paid for the work on it, hence the speed of slug. Pavel Vozenilek 13:37, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
PS: if you add some information on your user page User:Westfall the links turn blue instead of being red. Being red is one of signals to people to recheck your edit (could be joker, vandal, uninformed newbie, ....). Often, when one's name is recognised as reliable contributor people skip it in checking (a real time-saver).
Thanks for the heads up but I think I'm still a newbie in some ways. :) Westfall 04:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Disambiguation subheadings

You're quite right that the example at WP:DAB#Longer lists uses bold formatting for the subheadings. I felt that the subheadings stand out well enough by their position alone, without competing with Wikipedia's standard bold formatting for the title term in the leading line. I think this is one of those things that has never been considered carefully (I could be wrong), is not stated explicitly in the MOS, and seems to be done a half dozen different ways in practice. One of these days I'll propose some new wording and put it to a vote. Sorry for the revert. Regards. —Michael Z. 2006-02-26 20:51 Z

Hope to see you around. :) Westfall 04:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sure

Sure, but it looks like you already have it up. Evan Robidoux 20:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! Westfall 04:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] hello

thanks Anonymous_anonymous Have a Nice Day 08:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Westfalls

Are you the same person as User:Mayor Westfall and User:Baron Von Westfall? 71.31.150.46 05:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

No. Westfall 02:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:US Pharmacist magazine (Aug 2005).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:US Pharmacist magazine (Aug 2005).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)