Talk:Westland Whirlwind (helicopter)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

On your page for the Westland Whirlwind helicopter you sometimes include a space in the type designation and sometimes not. I wanted to make this consistent but didn't want to make this consistently wrong; which should it be? --Morven 18:59, 6 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Truly I have no idea. I checked, and the RAF Museum has both uses on the same page, so I'm guessing it isn't important. Feel free to pick one. DJ Clayworth 19:03, 6 Nov 2003 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox mistake?

Introduced 1950, maiden flight 1953? If the earlier dat erefers to the Sikorsky H-19, isn't this still incorrect as British built versions of Sikorsky products usually differed somewhat? Douglasnicol (talk) 21:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I have changed introduced to 1954 when the first Whirlwind HAR1s were delivered to the RN. MilborneOne (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)