Weak ontology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is missing citations or needs footnotes. Using inline citations helps guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (April 2008)

[edit] Weak ontology in computer science

In ontology in computer science, a weak ontology is one that is not sufficiently rigorous to allow software to infer new facts without an intervention by human being (the end users of the software system).

This distinction does not apply to ontology in philosophy because in that field, all inference is performed by human beings. Accordingly, from the point of view of computer science, philosophers do only weak ontology, except to the degree that their work converges with mathematics, Boolean logic and other subfields where automatic reasoning is known to be possible.

By this standard, which is relatively recent and evolved only as artificial intelligence methods became more sophisticated, and computers were used to model high human impact decisions, most databases use weak ontologies.

A weak ontology is adequate for many purposes including education, where one is teaching a set of distinctions and trying to induce the power to make those distinctions in the student. Stronger ontologies only tend to evolve as the weaker ones prove deficient. This phenomenon of ontology becoming stronger over time parallels observations in folk taxonomy about taxonomy: as a society practices more labour specialization it tends to become intolerant of confusions and mixed metaphors and sorts them out into formal professions or practices - ultimately, these are expected to reason about them in common, with mathematics especially statistics and logic as the common ground.

On the World Wide Web, folksonomy in the form of tag schemas and typed links has tended to evolve slowly in a variety of forums, and then be standardized in such schemes as microformats as more and more forums agree.These weak ontology constructs only become strong as demand grows for a more powerful form of search engine than is possible with keywording.

[edit] Weak ontology in political theory

Weak ontology has a different, unrelated, meaning in political theory, where it describes a pragmatic approach that seeks to avoid foundationalist commitments. The term was first used in this context by Stephen K. White, professor of Politics at the University of Virginia.