Talk:We Are Marshall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	College football Portal We Are Marshall is part of WikiProject College football, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Assessment Comments This article has been rated for quality but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

	We Are Marshall is part of WikiProject KYOVA Region, a project which aims to coordinate work for and expand coverage of the Kentucky, Ohio, and West Virginia "tri-state" region. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join or engage in discussion.(Usage)
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
	Please explain ratings you add or change by editing this article's ratings summary page.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.105.148.244 (talk • contribs) on 22:12, 14 December 2006

Are you sure that bowl record for most points still stands? I thought Boise or UL or someone beat it? Might be wrong though. Anyone know for sure? 151.205.84.58 05:22, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

• The record for most total points in a bowl (125) game still stands. Marshall's record for largest deficit overcome in a bowl game (30 points) was broken by Texas Tech in the 2006 Insight Bowl, where the Red Raiders beat Minnesota 44-41 in overtime despite trailing the Golden Gophers 38-7 in the third quarter. 147.70.242.40 18:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

I broke the Red Dawson link. The Red Dawson with an article in Wiki is a totally different person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.105.148.244 (talk • contribs) on 22:12, 14 December 2006

Contents 1 Film vs reality 2 Trivia section inaccuracy 3 Robert Patrick credit 4 Fair use rationale for Image:We-are-marshall-lores.jpg

[edit] Film vs reality

Changes for the film shouldn't really be in a plot section but separate. Also, I am not clear how much of the trivia is relevant to the film. -- Beardo 13:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trivia section inaccuracy

There is a reference the to the Herald-Advertiser, which was not Huntington's afternoon newspaper at any time. In 1970, the same organization that owned WSAZ-TV also owned the morning Huntington Herald-Dispatch and the afternoon Huntington Advertiser (the latter published its last edition about 1979). The Herald-Advertiser was the combined Sunday newspaper. When the afternoon newspapers stopped, the Sunday papers began showing the Herald-Dispatch name that was on the morning papers. 147.70.242.40 15:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

The "Red Dawson" link goes to the wrong Red Dawson (who died in 1983).

[edit] Robert Patrick credit

Does anyone know why Robert Patrick had his credit waived for playing coach Tolley? I'll check the web when I get the chance... Ellsworth (talk) 22:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:We-are-marshall-lores.jpg

Image:We-are-marshall-lores.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)