Talk:We3/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Talk:We3
In the Reception section of this article, the history tab will reveal a frequent back and forth between editors, one of which seems to insist on elaborating the "pro-animals rights" comment in an inflammatory manner. It is enough to say the book is pro-animal rights, do we really have to drag in evidence, particularly so brutal? It represents a stance I'm uncomfortable with, to suggest that the violence against animals is returned in kind to humans as "pro-" anything.
Let's not turn this into a PETA side project. Keep to the facts or at least yield citations.
