Talk:WBQC-CA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] WOTH
It doesn't seem that WOTH's programming is mostly the infomercial type; see [1] for more information. I changed the text to state the two networks they are affiliated with. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs, blog) 02:57, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] WBQC shows i? I don't think so.
W9WI may say so, but I can find no i programming on WBQC's schedule, and it's not on i's affiliate list. I suspect W9WI is in error. I also think that, without firmer sources, we shouldn't say WBQC will become i in September. (It's possible it runs infomercials from i, but that's hardly a "secondary affiliation".) I'm going to start removing all reference to i from this article and from references to the station if I don't get something firmer. Morgan Wick 17:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Google News gives only a Cincinnati Enquirer article that indicates that it will go independent -- as in no network affiliation -- after UPN folds. Since I can't find i programming on the current schedule either, I think it's a non-affiliate of that network and we can remove such mentions -- I agree that W9WI might be a bit off here. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Around 1999, I remember watching programming from other networks on WBQC, including America One and possibly PAX (now i) – that's how I found out about those networks. It's entirely possible that they've since dropped that programming, however. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 05:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, America One has since moved to WOTH-LP; that may help explain it, but probably not the W9WI listing (maybe just the fact that it didn't go with A1 to WOTH?) Morgan Wick 06:14, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Roselawn
The Enquirer says they're a "Roselawn independent station". Did they move, or is the Enquirer just talking about their transmitter station? – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 06:41, 29 October 2006 (UTC)