Talk:Waverley (novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class. | ||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern | ||
 |
This article was the Novels WikiProject Collaboration of the Month (December 1, 2006–January 2, 2007). For details on the improvements made to the article, see the history of past collaborations. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the 19th century task force. (with unknown importance) | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Contents |
[edit] Source of the title 'Waverley'
I have read elsewhere that Scott was inspired to take the title 'Waverley' from Waverley Abbey near Farnham in Surrey. Can anyone verify this? John Owen Smith 09:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pieces on Waverley from Wikisource
I need to re-read and get back to this when I'm more awake, however the following are references that may be worthy of reference in this article:
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Spirit_of_the_Age/Sir_Walter_Scott - Refers repeatedly to scott as 'the author of waverley'
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_Denoting - An article on logic, but interestingly the argument of whether or not Scott wrote Waverley is used as an example:
If a is identical with b, whatever is true of the one is true of the other, and either may be substituted for the other in any proposition without altering the truth or falsehood of that proposition. Now George IV wished to know whether Scott was the author of Waverley; and in fact Scott was the author of Waverley. Hence we may substitute Scott for the author of 'Waverley', and thereby prove that George IV wished to know whether Scott was Scott. Yet an interest in the law of identity can hardly be attributed to the first gentleman of Europe.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Adullam - 1911 Encyclopedia - "From the description of Adullam as the resort of "every one that was in distress," or "in debt," or "discontented," it has often been humorously alluded to, notably by Sir Walter Scott, who puts the expression into the mouth of the Baron of Bradwardine in Waverley, chap. lvii., and also of Balfour of Burley in Old Mortality."
Silverthorn 17:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Literary Criticism
The Waverley Hypertext Project http://seneca.uab.es/SCOTT/ may be useful for the expanding the literary criticism aspect of this article. Silverthorn 12:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] To Do
I have attempted to expand the article using the novels article template as a guide. However, there still seem to be things to do:
- infobox tagged as incomplete - can this be improved?
- literary criticism - I've made a start, but this seems to be a section that requires expansion given Waverley's place in literary history.
- references from other works - does anyone know of any works that allude to Waverley that we should add?
- film/television/radio adaptations - do any exist that we should be aware of?
Silverthorn 17:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Waverley.jpg
Image:Waverley.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
