Wasserfall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Wasserfall | |
|---|---|
 |
|
| Type | Surface to air missile |
| Production history | |
| Manufacturer | Flak- Versuchskommando Nord, EMW Peenemuende |
| Unit cost | 7,000–10,000 Reichsmark |
| Produced | March 1943 |
| Specifications | |
| Weight | 3,700 kg |
| Length | 7.85 m |
| Diameter | 2.51 m |
|
|
|
| Warhead | 235 kg |
| Detonation mechanism |
Proximity |
|
|
|
| Engine | liquid-fueled rocket motor |
| Operational range |
25 km |
| Speed | 770 m/s |
| Guidance system |
MCLOS (Manual Command to Line Of Sight); operator used a radio command link to steer the missile along the optical line of sight from launch point to target. |
| Launch platform |
Fixed. |
The Wasserfall Ferngelenkte Flakrakete (English: Waterfall Remote-Controlled A-A Rocket, also known as Aggregat 5)[1] was a World War II guided surface-to-air missile developed at Peenemünde, Germany. One of the German Wunderwaffen, the Wasserfall design was used as a basis for both the American Hermes-A1 missile and a Soviet research programme under the codename R-101 after World War II.
Contents |
[edit] Technical characteristics
Wasserfall was essentially an anti-aircraft development of the V2 rocket, sharing the same general layout and shaping. Since the missile had to fly only to the altitudes of the attacking bombers, it could be much smaller than the V2, about 1/4 the size. The Wasserfall design also included an additional set of fins located at the middle of the fuselage to provide extra maneuvering capability.
Unlike the V2, Wasserfall was designed to stand ready for periods of up to a month and fire on command, therefore the volatile liquid oxygen used in the V2 was inappropriate. A new engine design, developed by Dr. Walter Thiel, was based on Visol (vinyl isobutyl ether) and SV-Stoff, or Salbei, (90% nitric acid, 10% sulfuric acid). This hypergolic mixture was forced into the combustion chamber by pressurizing the fuel tanks with nitrogen gas released from another tank. Wasserfall was to be launched from rocket bases (code-named Vesuvius) that could tolerate leaked hypergolic fuels in the event of a launch problem.[2]
Guidance was to be a simple radio control MCLOS system for use against daytime targets, but night-time use was considerably more complex because neither the target nor the missile would be easily visible. For this role a new system known as Rheinland was under development. Rheinland used a radar unit for tracking the target and a transponder in the missile for locating it in flight, read by a radio direction finder on the ground). A simple analog computer guided the missile into the tracking radar beam as soon as possible after launch, using the transponder to locate it, at which point the operator could see both "blips" on a single display, and guide the missile onto the target as during the day. Steering during the launch phase was accomplished by four graphite rudders placed in the muzzle of the combustion chamber, and (once high airspeeds had been attained) by the four air rudders mounted on the rocket tail. Commands were sent to the missile using a modified version of the "Kehl-Strassburg" (code name Burgund)[3] joy-stick system used to direct Henschel Hs 293 glide bomb, which had some significant successes against Allied ships in the Mediterranean.[4]
A second development was underway that used only a single cross-shaped radar beam that was rotated while pointing at the target. Like the Rheinland system the missile was first directed into the beam via the transponder, and from there would keep itself centered in the beam by means of a negative feedback system that listened to the radar signal; if it were off course it would hear pulses instead of a steady signal, and automatically place itself back in the middle of the beam. However the supersonic speed of the Wasserfall (up to Mach 2) meant that the accuracy of the system would have to be very high in order to get the missile close to its target, and it was generally accepted that some sort of infrared-homing terminal guidance system would have to be added.
The original design had called for a 100 kg warhead, but because of accuracy concerns it was replaced with a much larger one (306 kg) based on a liquid explosive. The idea was to create a large blast area effect amidst the enemy bomber stream, which would conceivably bring down several airplanes for each missile deployed. For daytime use the operator would detonate the warhead by remote control, while night-time use was to be by some sort of proximity fuze.
Conceptual work began in 1941, and final specifications were defined on November 2, 1942. The first models were being tested in March 1943, but a major setback occurred in August 1943 when Dr. Walter Thiel was killed in the massive RAF bombing raids on Peenemünde. After the first successful firing (the third prototype) on March 8, 1944,[5] Three Wasserfall trial launches were completed by the end of June 1944. A launch on 8 January 1944 was a failure, with the engine "fizzling" and launching the missile to only 7 km of altitude at subsonic speeds. The following February saw a successful launch which reached a speed of 770 m/s (2,800 km/h) in vertical flight.[6] Thirty-five Wasserfall trial firings had been completed by the time Peenemünde was evacuated on February 17, 1945.[7]
A V-2 rocket using Wasserfall radio guidance crashed in Sweden on June 13, 1944.
[edit] Assessment
It is one of the mysteries of the Third Reich why Hitler chose not to deploy the Wasserfall in large numbers. According to Speer and others, it could have devastated the Allied bomber fleets. Some have said the Wasserfall did not appeal to Hitler because it was a defensive, not offensive weapon, but at the same time other, much less effective weapons, such as the ME-163, were being pursued.
The project enjoyed little support in its earlier stages. From 1943 onwards, when the Allied strategic bombing offensive had already started, most of the resources Wasserfall would have needed to become operational went to the offensive-minded V2 rocket project instead. [8]
In his memoirs Albert Speer, Nazi Germany's Minister for Armaments and War Production during the second half of the war, later expressed his conviction that putting Wasserfall on the backburner might have been a war-deciding strategic error:
"To this day, I am convinced that substantial deployment of Wasserfall from the spring of 1944 onward, together with an uncompromising use of the jet fighters as air defense interceptors, would have essentially stalled the Allied strategic bombing offensive against our industry. We would have well been able to do that -- after all, we managed to manufacture 900 V2 rockets per month at a later time when resources were already much more limited."[9]
[edit] References
- ^ Ernst Klee & Otto Merk. The Birth of the Missile: The Secrets of Peenemünde Gerhard Stalling Verlag:Hamburg 1963 (English translation 1965) p 77
- ^ Klee and Merk. 70
- ^ Pocock. 71 81 87 107
- ^ Neufeld, Michael J. The Rocket and the Reich: Peenemünde and the Coming of the Ballistic Missile Era. The Free Press: New York, 1995. (p 235)
- ^ Pocock, Rowland F. German Guided Missiles of the Second World War Arco Publishing Company, Inc.:New York. 1967 (p 107)
- ^ Klee and Merk. 69
- ^ Pocock. 107 -- A claim in Christian Zentner's 1977 book, Lexikon des Zweiten Weltkriegs (ISBN 3-517-00639-4) that up to 50 missiles were fired against Allied bombers is inaccurate.
- ^ Frederick Ordway et al, The Rocket Team, 1979
- ^ Albert Speer, Erinnerungen. Propyläen Verlag 1969, (ISBN 3-550-06074-2) p 375
[edit] External links
- Wasserfall technical article, construction plans and test flight photos
- Collection of Wasserfall photos
- Genesis of the Surface to Air Missile (Defence Today)
- Wasserfall W-10 Drawing
[edit] See also
|
||||||||
Comparable aircraft
Related lists
|
||||||||||||||
