Talk:Wasp waist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Danish: Hvepsetaljen er den tynde talje, som fremkommer ved at man strækker musklerne i taljen fremad. Det tager en halvtime tids at trække musklerne, og det tager også en halvtimes tid inden at de finder deres normale stilling, efter at man har taget korsettet af. Da det kun er muskler, som man ændre så er der ikke andre helbreds mæssige konsekvenser (som er forskelig fra anden brug af korsetter) end at ryggens muskler ikke er helt så stive som normalt.}}

The wasp waist is the thin waist, as appears using you stretch the muscles in the waist forward.

It taken about a half hour to pull the muscles, and that are also about a half hour to get their ordinary position, after you have taken the corset of.

Then a just is muscle, as you other so for this reason do not others health important consequences from (different from other use of corset) as the backs muscle have not been fully so stiffen as normally.

this article is a wrongly translation from Danish: Hvepsetalje, the correct translation is: Tightlacing, because any tightlacing without a Wasp waist. Håbet 10:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Medical problems cited

I'm concerned about the source cited on the medical problems that a wasp waist was alleged to have caused, as the article cited is actually about Victorian perceptions of the dangers of the corset, rather than actual evidence for the corset causing medical problems. As I think I have at least one source to the contrary, I'd like to see a stronger source to persuade me not to reword and/or remove.

Katherine Shaw 13:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

The Wasp waist bend the muscles in the waist line forward. It takes time, a half hour to draw the muscles and again it a half hour to get the natural shape. Any other organ been changed. It is practical and aesthetically causes if you also change the ribs.Håbet 22:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haabet (talkcontribs)
That is unsupported information. Unsupported information has no place in an encyclopaedia. Give an authoritative source!
Katherine Shaw 13:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)