Talk:Wasim Raja

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
cricket ball Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability
Wasim Raja is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Did You Know An entry from Wasim Raja appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 4 September 2006.
Wikipedia

[edit] Copyedit

>> Raja also bowled flat finger spin with his right hand

Are we sure about this ? Finger spinning leg spinner ?

>> and the bowling averages with 7 wickets at 18.7.

Majid Khan topped the bowling averages with 4 wickets at 17.50 [1]

>> In all, he played in 250 first-class matches, scoring 11,434 runs at an average of 35.18, including 17 centuries, and taking 558 wickets at an average of 29.05.

As per cricketarchive, 11386 @ 35.03 [2]

>>His finest hour in Test cricket was the tour to the West Indies in 1976-77, when he topped the Pakistani batting averages with 517 runs at 51.7

Average was 57.44. 10 innings and 1 notout. Tintin (talk) 10:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the careful reading. I'm glad someone is checking what I write! (I already corrected a mis-reading from the Guardian obit, about the West Indies' long undefeated streak at the Barbados)
  • The claim of topping both averages in that series was from here, but I will change to being second on the basis of your link. Perhaps I should have noticed that none of the other obits make the claim.
  • Cricinfo says 11,434 first-class runs at 35.18. No idea why cricket archive says something different, but until we know which it right and why they differ, I will stick with the cited source.
  • I have no idea where 51.7 comes from - all of the sources say 57.4. I can only think that I wrote 517 twice, and added a decimal point to the second one!
Thanks again. Perhaps you should check Clyde Walcott for me... -- ALoan (Talk) 11:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)