Talk:Washington Summit Publishers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 27 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Ultramarine will place an arguement for why this is not an attack page shortly. --N4GMiraflores (talk) 21:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I am not the page creator. If you want to delete the page, do an ordinary deletion request.Ultramarine (talk) 21:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Criticism or ...

I reverted back to criticism due to the following:

  1. "which reprints a range of classical and modern racist tracts"
  2. "discredited 'science' of breeding better humans"
  3. "WSP also reprints 'classic' Aryan and eugenic tracts"
  4. "The Southern Poverty Law Center lists Washington Summit Publishers as a White Nationalist Hate Group"

This does not seem like replaying the facts, and is all opinion on content, therefore criticism. --N4GMiraflores (talk) 21:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Cited material. Read WP:NPOV. Claimed POV is not a justification for deletions.Ultramarine (talk) 21:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Those come from the second quote which does appear to be criticism. The first quote appears to me to be more of a statement of facts so I pulled it out of the criticism section. Does that work for people? TheRedPenOfDoom (talk) 21:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Why should we remove criticisms? Ultramarine (talk) 21:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
You are so quick to argue, you do not see they were never removed. We are discussing the title of the section. --N4GMiraflores (talk) 21:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Right. Why was material removed. If no objections, I will restore it.Ultramarine (talk) 21:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Nothing was removed ... --N4GMiraflores (talk) 21:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Right. Confused by new sections. My mistake.Ultramarine (talk) 21:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
"Accusations" is now an incorrect title for the section. If you look at the titles of the books published: "Ancient Eugenics", "Aryan Household-I" "Aryan Household-II", "Essays in Eugenics" "Aryan Race" it is not an 'accusation' to say that they print Aryan and Eugenic materials, that is a statement of fact and calling it an 'accusation' is POV.TheRedPenOfDoom (talk) 21:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)