Talk:Washburn "A" Mill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, which aims to improve all articles related to Minnesota.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article is on a subject of mid-importance within Minnesota articles.
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Article Split?

I'd like to see Mill City Museum split out as a separate article (it's currently a redirect), and filled out with more information about the museum itself. Thoughts? --Rehcsif 18:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

I would suggest starting a museum section within the article first, and then if both the historical building sections and the museum sections are large enough, it would make sense to split them. Alternatively, if the museum section is much larger than the mill section, perhaps the mill section could be an historical section within the revised article.--Appraiser 18:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

That's fine, and there's already a very small section about the museum in the article. I just thought that it might get more attention if it had it's own articles. And as it stands, if someone enters "Mill City Museum" looking for info on that, they get the Washburn article, which isn't exactly what they were looking for... But whatever make the most sense! --Rehcsif 18:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Another possibility is to rename this "Mill City Museum" if the article becomes mostly about the museum.--Appraiser 18:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)