Ware & Leland v. Mobile County
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WARE & LELAND, a Copartnership, and J. H. Ware, E. F. Leland, Charles W. Lee, and F. J. Fahey v. Mobile County and the State of Alabama | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||||
Argued March 10, 1908 Decided April 8, 1908 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||||
Contracts for the sales of cotton for future delivery which do not oblige interstate shipments are not subjects of interstate commerce, and that a state tax on persons engaged in buying and selling cotton for future delivery was held not to be a regulation of interstate commerce or beyond the power of the state. | ||||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||||
Majority by: Day |
||||||||||||
Laws applied | ||||||||||||
US Constitution Article I, Sec. 8. |
In Ware & Leland v. Mobile County, 209 U.S. 405 , 28 Sup. Ct. 526, 14 Ann. Cas. 1031, (1908), the United States Supreme Court held that contracts for the sales of cotton for future delivery that do not oblige interstate shipments are not subjects of interstate commerce. The Court also held that a state tax on persons engaged in buying and selling cotton for future delivery was not a regulation of interstate commerce, and that the imposition of the tax was not beyond the power of the state.
[edit] See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 209
- List of United States Supreme Court cases on commodity and futures regulation
- List of sources of law in the United States
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.