User talk:WarthogDemon/Archive/Archive 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

← Archive 7 |

Archive 8

| Archive 9 →

Re: Deleted Picture?

Re your message: I fixed it. The Infobox doesn't want px following the image size. Why it ends up a redlink, who knows... one of those fancy template mysteries. =) -- Gogo Dodo 18:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Smile From Chris

Chris has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Have a smileChris 12:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Firearm

Hi. I've redirected to M16 rifle after a quick Google search for the rifle. In future if you find something like this, Google the topic, then search for an appropriate redirect. If none exist and the article seems notable and verifiable, mark as a stub in an appropriate category. If it doesn't match the above criteria and makes no assertion of notability, mark for speedy deletion (Particularly CSD A1 or CSD A7) if applicable, prod or nominate for deletion. Thanks for your alert - any other questions, I'm usually around :). ck lostsword • T • C 00:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [1]. -WarthogDemon 00:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Cheers - my knowledge of guns is also limited (doesn't one end have some kind of hole?) but Google is *ahem* omniscient :P. ck lostsword • T • C 00:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Multiple messages

Re your messages: A arbitration case has been filed against User:TTN. I will defer to the Arbitration Committee for resolution, though it appears that they will defer it to other means of dispute resolution at this time.

I don't know what you are referring to with your Calumet, Colorado question. Sorry. Can you clarify what you are asking? -- Gogo Dodo 16:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [2]. -WarthogDemon 18:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Re your message: Ah, well, there are worse people to be confused with. =) Anyways, you have established that Calumet existed at one time or another, but not why it's notable. A single fictional reference in a movie where the location is not really that central to the plot is probably not enough for inclusion. -- Gogo Dodo 19:00, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [3]. -WarthogDemon 05:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Re your message: Well, if it was the world's largest deposit or if it was some notable deposit, I suppose... but it doesn't seem all that important. The mineral itself doesn't seem all that important. -- Gogo Dodo 06:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [4]. -WarthogDemon 06:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Midnight Rescue

Well I'm not sure I have that game anymore but I'll certainly try to find it. I'm pretty sure Buffo's name comes from being a buffing brush. Gladrius 05:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [5]. -WarthogDemon 06:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Well lessee...the closest thing I've been able to find yet is the article on metal polishing, which doesn't really have to do with painting, I admit, but to be honest I never heard of buffers used for painting, although that's what Buffo appears to be. Gladrius 15:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. -- :) Chetblong 01:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [6] -WarthogDemon 06:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Merging

In this case I'd suggest not, because one is a list of steamships and one is a list of sailing vessels; that's a sharp distinction, and both lists are quite long enough. I just checked how other countries are handled, and I see that the distinction is also made there. It isn't really helpful to disturb long-standing arrangements like this, unless there's a really good reason, or you have a much better arrangement to propose. And there's actually a WP practice that every one of these ships would qualify for an individual article. DGG 22:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [7]

Username Report

Hey, just a heads up...when reporting a username violation in the future, please report it at UAA instead of AIV...thanks, and happy editing! Jmlk 1 7 01:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here -> [8]. -WarthogDemon 01:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

All good buddy...happy editing! Jmlk 1 7 01:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Just to let you know.....

....all username violations now go to WP:UAA - it's the same format as AIV, so you don't have to learn anything new :-)! Thanks for your report, Ryan Postlethwaite 01:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied at [9]. -WarthogDemon 01:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Gina Genovese

No, you don't need to. Your message is also relevant if (s)he has some conflict of interests. — Indon (reply) — 19:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Gamesaving

Gamesaving needs refernces, and i don't know the subject well enough to know if it is notable or not. Vandalism is not a good reason to delete an otherwise valid articel. If you have good reason to think this isn't notable, use {{prod}}, if you want the amtter discussed, you can alswas use afd. i have added an unrefernced tag, and put this on my watch list. If IP vandalism remains a problem, there is always semi-protection, which prevents editing by anyone not logged in. I see no reason to speedy delete at this time. DES ^(talk) 21:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [10]. -WarthogDemon 21:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

I see. it's not a great article as it stands, but i've seen worse become good articles. If some refernces could be found demonstratign both that the practice is widespread and that thsi is the common term for it, that would be a good start. DES ^(talk) 21:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Spaces in wikilinks

Hiya. Saw this. For info, spaces in wikilinks are, I believe, academic if there is nothing else inside the link. e.g. [[cheese ]] still becomes cheese no matter how many spaces you ram in it. (see the markup to spot the extra spaces). The fix was a goodie, so this is just a bit of info. Ta! Pedro | Chat

Thanks (2)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. If only that (now indefinitely blocked) user knew how harmless it is to put a first name (one that's in the top 20 most common names) on my page. hmwith talk 13:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [11]. -WarthogDemon 22:12, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Mazon

Give me one min here to look it over. One is the village, while the other is the actual township unless the township does not extend to the lands beyond the city limits.--Kranar drogin 03:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, looking these over, they are two differnt bodies of government. One is Mazon the village, while the other is Mazon the township. The village is 0.6 mi² while the township is 35.5 mi². The populations are also different (where the township also includes the 904 from the village). So honestly, you shouldn't do redirects. There are many other townships in the state that are named the same as a village or city in them, but are different. As far as the naming, we are doing it the same as the Ohio project, and the same as the US Census names. Now, if you want to change over 2,000+ articles to exclude the county, I think that is something else we are going to have to discuss.--Kranar drogin 03:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [12] -WarthogDemon 03:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw it after I had typed it all up! haha. Sorry for the long winded explanation. I just had a lot to say, and wanted to back up my numbers and info. Thanks though for bringing it up, I do appreciate it.--Kranar drogin 03:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [13]. -WarthogDemon 04:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Chess.com

I'm curious why Chess.com doesn't deserve a page? I think it is unique and interesting to chess players, at least as interesting as the other websites that I frequent (gameknot, red hot pawn, chessbase, etc. But I'm open to hearing your thoughts? -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chess4life (talk • contribs).

Replied here: [14]. -WarthogDemon 22:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

More About Illinois

Moccassin is all screwed up now. I don't know what the heck the admins are doing, but they have merged, deleted whatever.--Kranar drogin 13:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [15]. -WarthogDemon 22:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I think we got it all straight for now. Mistakes happen, and we just move on from there. Let me know if you run into any other questions concerning Illinois and I will try and answer it for you (or get you one).--Kranar drogin 01:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

...I needed that. It's been a slightly contentious couple of days around here. Hopefully the new month will change all of that. =) -- Gogo Dodo 06:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [16]. -WarthogDemon 01:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Re your message: Thanks, but I'm okay. I did what I said I would do a long time ago... I walked away from the computer and had a bowl of ice cream. Watched TV a little and played a video game. =) -- Gogo Dodo 20:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Illinois Confusion

Don't worry about it, I didn't help matters any by adding in a redirect. Administrators have the capacity to undo moves by a process called histmerge, but that requires temporary deletion. If you ever need to merge article histories or undo moves, add {{db-g6}} or simply ask an admin for assistance. Anyway, everything seems to be all right now, thanks to Kranar drogin explaining the situation. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 20:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Warning template you were looking for

Was it {{uw-bv}} or {{uw-vandalism4im}}? Kesac 03:45, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [17]. -WarthogDemon 04:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Beauty and the Beast (2003 film)

Re your message: It's rather heavy on the plot and nothing else. It makes the article feel a bit fancrufty if you know what I mean. Stating that it's PG-13 and its rather low IMDB score doesn't help any. -- Gogo Dodo 05:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [18]. -WarthogDemon 00:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Re your message: Linking actors does not make it notable. Unless you're playing Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon. =) Outside reviews would probably help a great deal. WP:NOTFILM -- Gogo Dodo 03:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Zamit

"Are you certain all is well with John Żammit. Article seems to be written by the person himself which might be conflict of interest, but I'm not sure. -WarthogDemon 02:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)"

I'm not the least sure how notable he is, but it isn't a speedy for obvious lack of notability--From Google, he seems to be a local big shot in Malta. This isn't going to be easy to source--what I've just done is put a prod on to give time. It would help if you'd keep track--if someone removes the prod without improving it, p[lease send to AfD. Agreed, its COI, but that is not a reason for speedy. if someone with COI writes a really spammy article, then speedy for G11 spam is often applicable. If they're lazy, then copyvio is worth a look. But this is a sober article of dubious notability. Not everyone agrees with me, but I think speedy is only fair when it is unquestionably non-notable or altogether impossible on other grounds. I apologize for not putting on a prod immediately, but there's a large speedy backlog tonight and not enough admins seem to be around, & I want to help clear out the real trash before the holiday. DGG 02:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [19]. -WarthogDemon 02:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

you deleted this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kelly_Nolan please see talk page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gpthurston (talk • contribs). -WarthogDemon 06:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [20]. -WarthogDemon 06:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Smile

Dar-Ape has smiled at you and left this dancing hippopotamus on your talk page. Dancing hippopotamuses (or hippopotami) promote WikiLove and other ~~Orwellian sounding~~ goodthink concepts. Spread the love and the polka by sending this message to another user.

Cheers, Dar-Ape 15:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the smile

Haha, I'm having a bit of a gloomy day to, Couldn't have come at a better time. I havn't recieved a smile in a while and thank you for it also.

An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor- Away.. Or does it! ^{(talk)(contribs)} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor- Away.. Or does it! ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandal report

Hi there; no, actually you didn't do it right. But no matter. When you want to report a username violation, then the place to do it is WP:UAA. But it is a natural mistake to make, because the page has not been up very long. Worry not, all is well.--Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [21]. -WarthogDemon 20:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

yes I'm sure. But the page has not existed for very long, and It may be that when you posted the spam username WP:UAA did not exist. It's no big deal ,and I wasn't complaining even slightly. I just thought that you deserved an answer to your question. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [22]. -WarthogDemon 20:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Mudkip eggs

I placed them in their own article after any mention of them was removed from the Mudkip article several times. If the mudkip eggs clutter up the mudkip article too much, this is understandable objection and they can be moved to separate article, as I have done. User:Zaphraud 01:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: First world problems

Hello WarthogDemon. Regarding your change of my tag of First world problems from spam to nonsense, I would have liked to revert it to spam. This was an article advertising a book, written in the style of an adverstisement. It was coherent English - patent nonsense is something that makes little to no sense at all. As my friend User:Leebo would say:

"A page can be deleted as nonsense when it is simply a meaningless string of characters...

Example given - $₯fe₠./₣- ƒ-j ₭ ₤ ℳ ₥ ₦ ₧ ₰ £ ៛ ₨ ₪ ৳ ₮ ₩ ¥ ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦

...or a collection of words that alone may exist in the dictionary, but together comprise an incoherent jumble.

Example given - i butt blattnt plant Template:Butt gunna take iup spiders bagiones preeow oooofa and you prickly dance town monsters"

Thank you for your interest in correctly tagging this article, but I was going to revert it to spam when I found it was already deleted. Since I already had this typed up, I figured I would share my feelings with you any how. If you still disagree, please let me know and we can discuss it further. Have a good one. bwowen ^talk.^contribs 05:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [23]. -WarthogDemon 05:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for the info! Glad to have chatted with you. Take care, and happy editing. =] Best, bwowen ^talk.^contribs 05:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Deleted Page As I Made An AfD

Re your message: I was very tempted to delete the AfD out from under you, but I held off for a moment. =) It's gone now. The bio was not going to meet the requirements for athlete's notability. I suspect that it's a autobiography, too. -- Gogo Dodo 05:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [24]. -WarthogDemon 05:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Re your message: I have no idea why. =) Actually, I paused for a moment because I didn't want to cause any undue confusion on your part... it's there, I mangled the AfD, oops, fix it, it's gone, what happened?!? Or something like that. =) -- Gogo Dodo 05:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Littlepaw

Well, the author needs to write more than one sentence, and needs to at least try to explain why this skateboard company is any more notable than any other given one. NawlinWiki 03:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

I speedied it again, with a note to the author telling him/her that the article needed to be more than one sentence. NawlinWiki 03:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [25]. -WarthogDemon 04:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Roland Aranjo article

Considering that the article is completely promotional and heavily slanted, along with the fact that the subject of the article is likely to be the same person who wrote it, I think that G11 is in session. Sr 13 21:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [26]. -WarthogDemon 21:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Appreciate your eyeballs

Thanks for catching the nonsense edits and oddities you caught in the various horse articles today! Montanabw 05:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [27]. -WarthogDemon 00:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

On essays

The essay you want to write is certainly appropriate for Wikipedia. As for what style to use, just write and you'll find something. MessedRocker (talk) 08:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Galatian War

Ok, thanks for that. Kyriakos 01:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [28]. -WarthogDemon 01:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Question to you

Just asking, but what reason do you have to put Mauiprivateequity (talk • contribs • logs) on the vandals list? -Yancyfry

Replied here: [29]. -WarthogDemon 04:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, Just checking. Yancyfry

Replied here: [30]. -WarthogDemon 04:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Na, I didn't see anything in the contribs. I guess I wasn't paying close attention to your report. -Yancyfry

Local Ecumenical Project

I noticed that you PRODded Local Ecumenical Project without citing a reason; it needs more sources, but does have one already. Aha... just looked for Local ecumenical partnership and it exists, so I'll merge & redirect instead.

What was your main reason for the PROD? WP:OR? This might influence how much I merge or delete. Fayenatic london (talk) 07:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [31]. -WarthogDemon 19:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

OK, PROD was certainly better than CSD, but I'd recommend always stating your reasoning for either of them. It showed up at DumbBOT;ProdSummary with bot notice: no reason given. At least that caught my eye, as at least some of the content seemed worth keeping!

And you're welcome for the revert; I happened to look at my watchlist at the right moment. - Fayenatic london (talk) 21:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [32]. -WarthogDemon 21:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Going Insane Over A Tag

Re your message: You're looking for {{Fact}}, {{Unreferenced}}, and {{Unreferencedsection}}. [33] -- Gogo Dodo 17:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied here: [34]. -WarthogDemon 19:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Galatian War (2)

It got pretty well expanded. :) Corvus cornix 17:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)