User talk:Warfreak/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, Warfreak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --Ed (Edgar181) 13:45, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Contents

My Request for Protection

Hopefully, it won't fail as there are plenty of vandalism on the page. This is the first time I ever request for protection. So I don't know if this will work. Chris 02:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, you are right. The administrator only granted the page a two-day semi protection. Chris 02:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice. Out Chris 02:47, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


Wikiproject Food and Drink

I saw that you recently joined the Wikiproject Food and Drink and I wanted to welcome you. I have been working on restructuring the main page for the project and getting together some tasks for the group to concentrate on. I will post some ideas on the project page for members to peruse and decided if they would like to assist. Looking forward to reading your contributions.--Christopher Tanner, CCC 05:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


May 2007

Thank you for making a report about 71.156.120.127 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. TTalk to me 01:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


Reporting

Although the user has not received a final warning, I'm using Twinkle to report him. It is obvious that will not deter him and is evidently a vandalism account. I will take into consideration how often I report people without a final warning though. -- Warfreak 01:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Umm, its a I.P. address, not an account. --TTalk to me 01:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Point Taken. Anyway, thanks for the advice and BTW, the vandal stopped vandalizing. The preceding unsigned comment was made by Warfreak 01:51, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Figures. A stern warning usually does the trick. TTalk to me 01:51, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Warnings

Just a comment: seems that this user should have got {{uw-delete4}} after {{uw-delete3}}, not {{uw-vandalism3}}. Anyway, keep up good work. :) Jacek Kendysz 07:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from User talk:Warfreak. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt on this one, but removing content and more particually warnings from your talk page is ill-advised, unless of course the content is blatant vandalism which necessicates reporting to WP:AIV. I would suggest that you set up either MiszaBot III or Werdnabot to archive your talk pages if you're wanting to keep them clean. Cheers, Thewinchester (talk) 02:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule on Tiberium. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

WjBscribe 00:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Given your assurances by email that you will cease reverting and abide by any consensus that develops at Talk:Tiberium.

Request handled by: WjBscribe 02:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


I've created a page for you to work on a draft of the article at User:Warfreak/Tiberium as we discussed. WjBscribe 02:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

After you were unblocked, you reverted the article again. A partial revert is still a revert, and all you've done is replace part instead of all of the badly sourced, in-universe original research. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Embrace (UK band) and 85.176.211.237

Just a heads up, by WP:Verify information in dispute is kept on wikipedia by sourcing, not by whether or not it sounds plausible. I just researched every point in the trivia section that was deleted, and could not find a single source supporting it, so Special:Contributions/85.176.211.237 was correct in removing it. Given this, you may wish to remove the warning on the user's talk page (and just offkey, {{subst:uw-delete1|PageName}} is a more appropriate template for removal of information). Cheers Guycalledryan 02:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Revert on Plamondon, Alberta

Kindly reconsider your revert on Plamondon, Alberta. You have reverted to a vandalised version. Thanks. --67.142.130.29 02:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Help please

Sorry, but I didn't vandalize! I have seen that all the trivia section about Embrace is all rubbish and is written by the same person who writes a lot of lies about [[Clint Boon)). Please have a look about the work from user SammyShammy and 84.67.25.187 and 90.240.90.80 I guess this is one person.


I was the one that added the prod and felt that it was better as I edited it. Please refrain from editing my own edits, thank you. 172.164.111.141 01:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

PS Before you take a bots word on anything, I suggest you look at things like the article history first to verify if it really is what you say it is. 172.164.111.141 02:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
And one last thing before I go, since when has it been not ok to edit one's own work? And how does that constitute vandalism? Please let me know so I will know what I can and can't edit in the future. 02:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

AIV

Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. Jmlk17 05:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

You are doing a great job with the anti-vandal work. Keep it up! Jmlk17 06:08, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Abraham Lincoln

I just wanted to let you know that the version that your reverted to (to combat vandalism) still had vandalism in it. (I missed the previous edits by the same user when I reverted). I reverted all the way back to the last pre-vandalism version of the page. I didn't want you to think that I ran roughshod over your anti-vandalism efforts... Horologium t-c 05:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I was doing the new changes patrolling too. The little creep is still at it; I just reverted him again. Horologium t-c 05:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Campa Cola

Have you been adding these details to the Campa Cola article.
Cola Manufacturer = Originally Pure Drinks & Campa Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Bottling & Market by S.V Cold Drink Factory , Vill.
SudhaMazra, Balachaur, Nawanshahar,Punjab. Contact :- Praveen Kumar (Marketing Manager)+919876620704,
Owner & Partner:- Mr. Vinod Kumar & Sham Sunder +919815985422
--AdamJWC 02:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC) It may have been an accident but the page has been protect becuase of these additions / The personal details in the info box--AdamJWC 02:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Your message

Sorry but what are you talking about, should I consider your message as a vandalism? careful and please explain or refrain of posting such inflammatory messages on anybody's talk pages. If you have made a mistake, please state it so in my talk page, thanks John Manuel Click in here to explain your behavior-"-Todos Llegan de Noche, todos se van de día" 03:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

OK, thanks, can you tell me the name of the banner or in which page is it? because, I am not remember creating one, perhaps you are confused about it and might be another user altogether.John Manuel Click in here to explain your behavior-03:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Now, What is the name of the banner?. Please, it is not a good idea to edit other people's pages, try to get the name of the banner and I will do something for you in this regard. Thanks. Click in here to explain your behavior -04:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Check your categories again and let me know, I think I have fixed it. Let me know to have closure over this subject. Thanks. Click in to respond -04:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Message to Warfreak

Hello Warfreak. Please do not revert the sourced material in the "Mel Sembler" article back to unsourced non-neutral material. The information I added has been attested to by a large number of individuals who claim they underwent serious abuse, torture, and other awful crimes in the facilities set up by Mel Sembler as part of STRAIGHT, Inc. If you don't believe me, please read the websites sited (the article in Alternet, the STRAIGHT survivors website, and the radio shows on RadioInsideScoop.com). Read the blog entries and most importantly, listen to the actual words of the many victims who called into the two radio shows. Some of the victims are Bush supporters, but they still describe horrible abuse in STRAIGHT and claim Sembler knew about it. The victims are very convicing and they have very serious allegations. If you feel like these allegations are non-neutral, then feel free to quote from Sembler's defenders. But you cannot delete a known fact just because you don't like to hear it. If you want to keep the allegations in, but relable them ("Critics of Mel Sembler and STRAIGHT Claim Awful Physical Abuse in STRAIGHT facilities"), I'm OK with that.

To my knowledge, Sembler has never denied that these abuses occurred in his facilities. If you are aware of such a denial, please post it on Wikipedia (with proper sourcing of course). Thank you!

June 2007 Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter June 2007

French cuisine

Thanks for updating the assessment on the article, although I know where it's at it wouldn't be appropriate for me to raise its rating.--Christopher Tanner, CCC 19:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

WikProject Food and drink

Hi Warfreak. I'm sorry that you find my tagging food articles with the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner annoying. I'm not doing it just to annoy you. I promise. :) I did discuss it on the project talk page first, so I'm a little surprised that after all this time you have such a hostile reaction to it. The best that I can suggest is that if you're getting bored with rating articles, do something else. These articles don't have to be rated right away. Or, if you feel compelled to stamp out the backlog of unrated articles, start with the ones that are of higher importance and broader interest. I've tried to tag both the obscure and the obvious, so there should be a variety to choose from. If that still doesn't content you, you will be pleased to know that I won't have much free time in the near future, so I won't be able to edit Wikipedia very much. Without my influx of newly tagged articles, the backlog should drop. Cheers, GentlemanGhost 22:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Overzealous seems a bit non intentionally insulting to say though Warfreak. I particularly appreciate that the project has someone tagging so many articles for the project. It is better to have numerous articles tagged for the project unassessed than not at all. As I had mentioned on the project page I will add a comment on getting other members to help in the next newsletter. With GentlemanGhost's assistance we have been able to finally get our number above our smaller off shoot projects, which seemed before that point slightly embarrassing to have them garnering more articles to work on than us. I think we should be thanking him over chastising him.--Christopher Tanner, CCC 06:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Category Talk Food and Drink Project

As the CA label does not do anything for these categories, maybe we should just label them as per our perceived importance of each category within the project? I think I was doing that at one point but stopped when you brought up that the CA tag doesn't do anything. I have seen other projects that have a space for CA tag as well as importance and relevance as well. Maybe Ill try to figure out how to add that to our banner and it might solve the issue. Any thoughts on it?--Christopher Tanner, CCC 16:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007 Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter July 2007--Christopher Tanner, CCC 19:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 15:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

August 2007 Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter August 2007

--Christopher Tanner, CCC 16:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kyriakos 12:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Wandalstouring 09:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007 WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter September 2007
--Christopher Tanner, CCC 15:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 10:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 10:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter November 2007

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter November 2007
--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 04:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Heads up

Hi Warfreak,

You'd earlier raised an objection to the number of talk pages that I had tagged with the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner. It looks like the assessing had a chance to catch up while I was inactive this summer. So, I've just asked a bot owner, Snowolf (talk · contribs), to use his bot, Snowbot (talk · contribs), to help tag any remaining food articles with the Project banner. Hopefully, this won't cause you any headaches. Theoretically, the more people we draw in, we should get more assistance with assessing the articles.

Cheers, GentlemanGhost (talk) 02:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter December 2007

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter Decemberr 2007
--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 22:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter January 2008

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter January 2008
--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 05:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Military history coordinator selection

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Woody (talk) 11:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)