User talk:WangFeiHung
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Anson Chan
I don't understand why you restored 137.189.4.1's edit despite the many errors and no sources in the text. For example, "The Airport authorities were made up mostly of British men - earning high salary from Hong Kong taxpayers." or "the locals had to pay taxes to London" was not backed up by any quantifiable facts - against Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you had facts - e.g. "10 ppl on the HK Airport Authority commanded salaries of over HKD100,000 paid by HK taxpayers" that would be valid - but such POV statements do not belong here.
Nevertheless, I moved the valid points in 137.189.4.1's edit to a section of critisms and controversies - feel free to expand on it, but please quote sources. Note that pro-Beijing and pro-Chinese is not the same thing. The PRC government is very much respected by the Chinese people but not everyone has to agree with what is decided by the government. --mintchocicecream 14:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
Your vandalism of Ansen Chan's page only shows your leftist bias and extremism, which does not fit Wikipedia's policy. Please note that all edits made by you on Ansen Chan's page will now be considered to be vandalism by me, regardless of what errors you corrected. If you cannot conform to the NPOV formulas of Wikipedia, I ask you to leave. Think this over. You have been warned of your actions. Arbiteroftruth 05:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] STOP - FINAL WARNING
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's NPOV rule by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Anson Chan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Arbiteroftruth 00:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Your edits to Anson Chan are exceptionally biased and non-neutral. Please read the Neutral Point of View requirements of Wikipedia. Edits of the sort you added are automatically reverted on sight, and will continue to be so. Please follow Wikipedia rules. Deliberate posting of biased edits can be seen as vandalism and lead to someone being blocked from editing Wikipedia. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 23:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC)