User talk:Walsha13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Notability of Ayrton-James Walsh 2 Notability of Ayrton-James Walsh 3 Article recreations 4 Zac Efron 5 Blocked

[edit] Notability of Ayrton-James Walsh

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ayrton-James Walsh, by Discospinster, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ayrton-James Walsh seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ayrton-James Walsh, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Ayrton-James Walsh itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Ayrton-James Walsh

A tag has been placed on Ayrton-James Walsh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 18:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Article recreations

Mr. Walsh, recreating the same article for yourself is not a good way to get it kept. I suggest you try putting up the Wikipedia article again after the 2008 television series gets off the ground. Then you would have enough acting notability to warrant an article in Wikipedia. Please take a look at WP:BIO#Criteria_for_notability_of_people, specifically the section for entertainers. Regards.--Chaser - T 18:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Zac Efron, you will be blocked from editing. --Yamla (talk) 00:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zac Efron

Hi Walsha. Before you added information to articles, please read Wikipedia:Verifiability. You must cite where you get your information from. Continuing to add unsourced material can result in a block. If you have any questions, just leave a message, thanks. Spellcast (talk) 19:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked to give you a chance to read and understand WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:RS. --Yamla (talk) 22:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

You were caught using the abusive sockpuppet account, AyrtonWalsh (talk · contribs), to avoid the block placed on this account. As such, your block timer has been reset. Further violations may result in an indefinite block. --Yamla (talk) 20:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)