User talk:Walkingwith08
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome!
|
[edit] Burgess Fauna
Hi Walkingwith08, while I'd love to do some more drawings of the Burgess critters (some of my all-time favorite prehistoric animals, see some of my stylized drawings of them here), it seems like these are already pretty well illustrated on Wikipedia. Do you need more drawings, or drawings in a different style, for any particular reason? I would be happy to put together a scale chart however, and have already started on it. The only concern I have is your inclusion of Anomalocaris, which is easily 30 times the size of the other animals on your list. Including it in the diagram would be problematic--if scaled so that you can see Anom's entire body, other critters like Hallucigenia would be practically invisible, maybe a little speck towards the bottom. If scaled so you can see the little guys, maybe a tiny bit of Anom would show up coming in from the margin, not even enough to get an idea of its shape. Would it be ok if I did a scale diagram of the tiny animals, and then one of Anom separately? Dinoguy2 (talk) 03:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- About the scale chart, It's that you can put Anom on there, but show only the head or something. Is that okay? Cause I still want the viewers of the chart to see the rest of the fauna. -Walkingwith08 (talk) 15:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- And, My idea was to make anom compared to the little guys. Behind them. So, okay? -Walkingwith08 (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- But, you can to Anom seperately. -Walkingwith08 (talk) 15:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
See your talk for details. -Walkingwith08 (talk) 15:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Here's my first go at the diagram, how's it look?
Dinoguy2 (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- I was expecting something more in scale with the fauna. :| -Walkingwith08 (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
That's it. -Walkingwith08 (talk) 15:21, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Leptictidium.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Leptictidium.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- DELETE IT NOW! YOU HATE ME! I FEEL LIKE CHRIS CROCKER!
-Walkingwith08 (talk) 18:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)==Image copyright problem with Image:Leptictidium.jpg==
Hi Walkingwith08!
We thank you for uploading Image:Leptictidium.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot (talk) 19:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Euromarks
Template:Euromarks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Sandstein 16:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)