Talk:Walk to Canossa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer review Walk to Canossa has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

The entry Canossa isn't very good either. Nevertheless, this material should be at Canossa, with a redirect. Without the historical context the story doesn't make much sense... --Wetman 03:15, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

On it (see my note at Talk:Canossa). - Che Nuevara: Join the Revolution 13:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Done - Che Nuevara: Join the Revolution 13:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Peer Review

I wrote this article using German sources. Most of the things listed here are more or less considered accepted fact in German history, and therefore not particularly worthy of citations. I tried, however, to cite a couple of things I thought might be curiosities. Is there anything else here that anyone feels needs to be cited or supported? - Che Nuevara: Join the Revolution 16:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

What happend to the theory that Canossa was besieged by Henry's troops? His army was strong enough for that. This conclusion could be drawn by German sources too, but it is not mentioned in this article. Obviously only the papal views were given especially Lambert of Hersfeld. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.76.98.125 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 4 December 2006

Canossa was besieged by Henry later, after his second deposition. His cousin Mathilda supported Pope Gregory and refused to allow Henry passage through Tuscany on his march to Rome, so he invaded. She retreated to Canossa, where Henry overpowered her. - Che Nuevara 21:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The painting

"Carlo Emanuelle" seems garbled. Could it be by Carlo Emanuele Lanfranchi, better known as a minor architect? --Wetman (talk) 23:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)