Talk:Walden Galleria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Walden Galleria has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
May 30, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, which is an attempt to better organize and unify articles relating to enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.
This article is part of the New York State WikiProject, an attempt to better organize and improve articles related to the U.S. state of New York. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Bulletin: The next New York City meetup is Sunday June 1st.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Valet Parking

I disagree with the claim that "Mall officials are also considering adding a valet parking to help shoppers ease a parking crunch. Popular with upscale malls, Walden Galleria would be only the second mall (after Palisades Center) to offer such a service." After the expansion of Eastview Mall in Rochester, NY's suburb of Victor, NY, they added a courtyard and a valet parking service for shoppers. This claim should be revised/investigated further. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fabykot (talk • contribs) .

I thought I removed that already. Let me check. Powers T 15:38, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Nope, I just tagged it. [1]. I have no problem if someone wants to remove it. Powers T 15:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Walden Galleria/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is very short but complemented with 32 footnotes and 5 appropriate images. Well written and referenced, well done.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

— Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 09:59, 30 May 2008 (UTC)