Talk:Wald
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article or section should be translated (or additional material should be added from material at German). Please translate this. |
[edit] This article appears to be very similar to...
this article: Roth (onomastics). The Roth article is now listed for deletion. Both articles were created by the same user, both are confusing, both are not completely in English... you get where I'm going with this. I'm going to bring this up at the Roth deletion discussion, and if the consensus is that that one should be deleted, than this one probably should be too. ONUnicorn 16:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Roth has now been deleted. I have proded this article for deletion also. Here is a link to the deletion discussion for Roth. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roth (onomastics). ONUnicorn 16:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- I can see that the existance of this page could be justified by the existence of articles like -onym (the situation is somewhat different, but in the same ballpark). The real issue that I see with this article is that almost none of the names listed actually have their own articles.--Mo-Al 18:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] All those place names
Do all those place names really belong on a disambiguation page? --Pstevens 09:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Not the ones which are not just "Wald", however you should probably look at Talk:Wahl to see what's going on here. Mo-Al 16:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- How about: we split this page into Wald (disambiguation) and Wald (onomastics). Then the debate about whether to delete the onomastics stuff can be separated from the need to have a disambiguation page from Wald. --Pstevens 14:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
