Talk:Wairarapa Line
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand Railways.
|
||
 |
This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article. Once the requested map is added, remove the Mapneeded parameter from the {{TrainsWikiProject}} template call on this page to remove this map request. | ||
 |
An editor has requested that an image be added to this article. Please work with the Images task force to add a suitable image to this article. Once the requested image is added, remove the Imageneeded parameter from the {{TrainsWikiProject}} template call on this page to remove this image request. |
 |
Wairarapa Line is part of WikiProject New Zealand, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
[edit] Hutt Valley: separate article?
Just a quick question for those with an interest in this article. I'm thinking of doing some expansion of it, but I'm unsure whether or not the Hutt Valley line should be treated separately or not. The way I see it is that the primary argument in favour of a combined article is that it's one line straight from Wellington to Woodville, while the primary argument in favour of separate articles is that the Hutt Valley section of the line is operated far differently to the Wairarapa section and could be viewed as a separate line, and that a fair bit can be said about the separate histories either side of the Rimutakas, so two articles may be more manageable than one big one.
Thoughts? - Axver 11:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Yes, perhaps. Plus seperate pages required for Melling Branch & Hutt Park Private Brance (is Hutt Park extn of Gracefield Branch? In the meantime have added re 1950s deviation from Western Hutt & electrification Hugo999 12:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Route map consistency
I have recently made changes to the Route Map for this article in an attempt to introduce some consistency in the way some of the visual elements have been used. In particular, the following changes were made:
- Staffed (or previously staffed) stations are indicated by a Major Station icon (e.g.
). - Unattended and flag stations are indicated by a Minor Station icon (e.g.
). - Names in bold indicate a Major Station that is currently operational.
- Former or alternate names are indicated in parentheses and in small type after the current or most recent name.
- Distances from the zero-kilometer peg are indicated in small type before the name or, in the case of bridges and tunnels, the length.
The staffed/unattended status of stations is derived from the New Zealand Railway and Tramway Atlas.
I have applied this approach to other route maps I have written for New Zealand lines, but if there are any other suggestions, comments are welcome. -- Matthew25187 (talk) 07:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Good. BTW, can I add to the anon editor: please don't add each and every heritage groups' position on the route map. It makes it much too large. --Lholden (talk) 08:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Appropriate logo
A recent change has been made to this article that removed elements from the infobox that associated the article with the Wairarapa Line service run by Tranz Metro, and replaced them with an image that associates the article with the Wairarapa Line track owned and maintained by ONTRACK. There are few, if any, other New Zealand examples where the same name is used for both a track and a service, thus the issue of which visual elements are most appropriate for this article's infobox should be discussed.
Therefore, should this article's infobox contain:
- The ONTRACK logo, evoking associations with the line owned by ONTRACK or,
- The Tranz Metro logo and colour yellow, evoking associations with the service operated by Tranz Metro?
Thoughts? -- Matthew25187 (talk) 04:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Addendum: I created this discussion thread before I noticed similar changes to the Wairarapa Connection article. -- Matthew25187 (talk) 05:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi matthew
- the line is ontrack
- the service is tranzmetro called 'waiararapa connection', for some strange reason the stupid people at GWRC (metlink) what everyone to call the service the 'wairarapa line' this is incorrect.
- As this article is about the line I used the Ontrack logo and placed the service colour and tranzmetro logo in the service page.
- In the infobox areas for the wairarapa connection stopping stations really needs to be changed to reflect the fact the service is called the wairarapa connection not wairarpa line.
- Also the Hutt Valley page is more about the line than the service so really should be ontrack logo not tranzmetro logo but ill leave that up to you as im not that intrested in the hutt section of the line -- Palmeriain (talk) 09:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
